Loading...
Answers
MenuVCs: What are some pitch deck pet peeves?
This question has no further details.
Answers
Avoid buzzwords:
- every founder thinks their idea is disruptive/revolutionary
- every founder says their financial projections are conservative
Instead:
- explain your validation & customer traction
- explain the assumptions underlying your projections
Avoid:
- focusing extensively on the product/technology rather than on the business
- misunderstanding the purpose of financial projections; they exist in a pitch deck to:
a) validate the founders understanding of running a business
b) provide a sense of magnitude of the opportunity versus the amount of capital requested
c) confirm the go-to-market strategy (nothing undermines a pitch faster than financial projections disconnected from the declared go-to-market approach)
d) generally discredit you as someone who understands how to build a company; for instance we'll capture 10% of our market, 1% of China, etc. Top down financial projections get big laughs from investors after you leave the room.
bonus) don't show 90% profit margins. Ever. Even if you'll actually have them. Ever.
Instead:
- avoid false precision by rounding all projections to nearest thousands ($000)
- include # units / # subscribers / # customers above revenue line; this goes hand-in-hand with building a bottom up revenue model and implicitly reveals assumptions. Investors will determine if you are realistic, conservative, or out of your mind based largely on the customer acquisition numbers and your explanation of how they will be achieved.
- highlight your assumptions & milestones on first customers, cash flow break even, and other customer acquisition and expense metrics that are relevant
Avoid:
- thinking about investor money as your money
- approaching the pitch from your mindset (I need money); investors have to be skeptics, so understand their perspective.
- bad investors; it's tempting to think that any money is good money. You can't get an investor to leave once they are in without Herculean efforts and costs (and if you're asking for money, you can't afford it). If you're not on the same page with an investor on how to run/grow the business, you'll regret every waking hour.
Instead:
- it's their money; tell them how you are going to utilize their money to make them more money
- you're a founder, a true believer. Your mantra should be "de-risk, de-risk, de-risk". Perception of risk is the #1 reason an investor says no. Many are legitimate, but often enough it's simply a perception that could have been addressed.
- beyond the pitch, make the conversation 2-way. Ask questions of the investor (you might learn awesome things or uncover problems) and talk to at least two other founders they invested in more than 6 months ago.
Tyler Crowley's famous storytelling video should give you some really useful directions. I cannot find the video reference but a quick summary of what he says is available at: http://pollenizer.com/pitch-clinic-summary-tyler-crowley/
A few keywords from what Tyler says are: Personas. First 15 seconds to engage. 8 out of 10 rather than 2 million users. Mental movie to setup the context.
PS: I have not pitched for myself but I have helped companies prepare their most important slide deck!-
I look at dozens of pitch decks every week and by far my #1 pet peeve is the comparison reference or the "we are the airbnb of xxxx"
I ran a small VC firm with a regional focus and reviewed over 1500 business plans/pitch decks.
The worst failing in most pitchdecks is the lack of sensible summary financial projections. By this I mean, financial projections that omit working capital requirements, that underestimate costs, that underestimate capital required, that overestimate revenues--in short financials that are just a series of straight line projections. Projections dont have to go down to the level of how much you will spend in year 22 on stamps, but they do need to have coherence.
The second worst failing is a failure to appreciate the nature of the competiton chasing the same idea or the same customers.
The third worst failing is keeping everything secret. The truth is that most likely somebody far smarter than you probably already has your idea and your next idea too. You make money by planning and executing, not by ideas.
Fourth is ludicrous ideas about valuation by unproven teams with vaporware or brochure ware or an imaginary test bed level product. All of those things can become a successful business, but not if you start out imagining that a couple of patents or patents pending are worth $100 plus million.
Please feel free to get in touch if you would like to discuss this further.
Pitch decks are concise presentation that help investors and clients understand more about your bussiness, including products, services, goals, and strategies
You should start with this http://walkercorporatelaw.com/startup-issues/5-common-mistakes-in-pitch-decks/
And read every link from this article ;)
Plenty! Let me list a few:
1. Wasting time by talking about your history, your products history or the company's history, or talking about how much you love this or that. The first words out of your mouth should be about what you have.
2. Spending the whole pitch selling the product but not the company. Investors only care about one thing, and that is whether an investment in your company will make them money. The product itself isn't as interesting as the company. Therefore, do not spend all your time telling us what a great product you have -- that's a sales pitch. Instead, tell us about how much money your company will make.
3. No experience in selling, and no plan for marketing.
4. The financials are bogus. Any one who thinks that the financials are just made up numbers anyway, so you can just throw up anything that looks good will not get any funding from any real investor. Make your financials as real as you can by having a CFO experienced in the industry.
5. Not making the "ask." Surprisingly, a lot of pitches forget to ask for money and how much they need, and fail to explain what that money is needed for.
6. Finally, do not ever say you are "passionate."
1)Firstly jargon overload , I see that a lot with founders
2)ASK!! please ask and verify what you need clearly
3)optimistic financials . This happens 90% with founders from my experience . then 5 years later we see no result lol
4) too much focus on the product and neglecting the team strength which is the core of the success
Here are some common pitch deck pet peeves that VCs report:
Too much text or bulletins, not enough visuals. Decks should tell the story visually.
Long decks over 20 slides. Keep it concise, at a maximum.
No executive summary. The first slide needs a clear overview.
Too much company history or background. Focus on the future opportunity.
Burying the ask. State funding is needed upfront; don't make them hunt for it.
Generic slides copied from others. Customize with your unique value props.
Lack of traction or metrics. Include KPIs, customer wins, and pilot program results.
No market sizing or opportunity analysis. Prove the problem and TAM.
Too many team bios all at once. Highlight 1–2 key founders.
No financial projections. Include, at minimum, a revenue model and assumptions.
Bad design or aesthetics. Slides should be clean, visually compelling layouts.
talking through slides word for word. Use them as prompts and make eye contact.
Going over time limits. Rehearse to hit 15 minutes or less.
Not answering questions directly. Come prepared to discuss this in depth.
Concise storytelling with data, visuals, and a clear ask are tops. Rehearse the deck presentation thoroughly.
Related Questions
-
I finally found my billion-dollar startup idea. Now what?
The idea is a very small fraction of what it takes to earn the first million. Certainly billion. What actually matters is your ability to *execute*. Entrepreneurship means "having the talent of translating opportunities into money". Or, as Alexis Ohanian of Reddit said, "entrepreneur is just French for 'has ideas, does them'." As much as it may seem that transitioning off your 9-to-5 is the biggest hurdle, it's not. If you can't "get out of the gate" then you're also not ready to deal with the real challenges of business, like "competition that has 1,000x your funding" or "suppliers that jerk you around" or "customers who steal your intellectual property". It's easy to have a "billion dollar idea". I'd like to mine gold off of asteroids; I'm sure that would be worth billions. I'd also like to invest in Arctic real estate that will become coastal vacation property after fifty more years of warming. And, of course, to make a new social network that everyone loves. But saying these things is very very different from accomplishing them. Prove your concept by first taking a small step, such as making the first dollar. (Maybe try Noah Kagan's course at http://www.appsumo.com/how-make-your-first-dollar-open/). If you can't figure out a way to "make it go" without a giant investment, then you're kidding yourself about your ability to execute the business. If you *can* figure out a way to get a toehold, then by all means do it now! Happy to advise further, feel free to contact me for a call.AS
-
How much equity is typically taken by investors in a seed round?
From my experience I would not advise you to go with Venture Capital when you're a start-up as in the end they will most likely end up screwing you. A much better source for funding would be angel investors or friends/family. The question of how much equity should I give away differs for every start-up. I remember with my first company I gave away 30% because I wanted to get it off the ground. This was the best decision I ever made. Don't over valuate your company as having 70% of something is big is a whole lot better than having 100% of something small. You have to decide your companies value based on Assets/I.P(Intellectual Property)/Projections. I assume you have some follow up questions and I would love to help you so if you need any help feel free to call me. Kind Regards, GiulianoGS
-
What percentage of VC funded startups make it to 100m+ revenues in 5 years or less?
100M+ in revenues in 5 years or less does not happen very often. As an example of one sector, here is an interesting data visualization (circa 2008) of the 100 largest publically traded software companies at that time that shows their actual revenue ramp-ups from SEC filings (only 4 out of these 100 successful companies managed this feat, which themselves are an extremely small percentage of all of the VC-funded software companies): How Long Does it Take to Build a Technology Empire? http://ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/08/how-long-does-it-take-to-build-a-technology-empire/ Key findings excerpted from the link above: "Only 28% of the nation’s most successful public software empires were rocketships. I’ve defined a rocket ship as a company that reached $50 million in annual sales in 6 years or less (this is the type of growth that typically appears in VC-funded business plans). A hot shot reaches $50m in 7 to 12 years. A slow burner takes 13 years or more. Interestingly, 50% of these companies took 9 or more years to reach $50m in revenue."MB
-
What is a better title for a startup head....Founder or CEO? Are there any pros/cons to certain titles?
The previous answers given here are great, but I've copied a trick from legendary investor Monish Pabrai that I've used in previous startups that seems to work wonders -- especially if your company does direct B2B sales. Many Founders/ CEOs are hung up on having the Founder/ CEO/ President title. As others have mentioned, those titles have become somewhat devalued in today's world -- especially if you are in a sales meeting with a large organization. Many purchasing agents at large organizations are bombarded by Founders/ CEOs/ Presidents visiting them all day. This conveys the image that a) your company is relatively small (the CEO of GM never personally sells you a car) and b) you are probably the most knowledgeable person in the organization about your product, but once you land the account the client company will mostly be dealing with newly hired second level staff. Monish recommends that Founder/ CEOs hand out a business card that has the title "Head of Sales" or "VP of Sales". By working in the Head of Sales role, and by your ability to speak knowledgeably about the product, you will convey the message that a) every person in the organization is very knowledgeable about the ins and outs of the product (even the sales guys) and b) you will personally be available to answer the client's questions over the long run. I've used this effectively many times myself.VR
-
How much equity should I ask as a C-level executive in a new startup ?
As you may suspect, there really isn't a hard and fast answer. You can review averages to see that a CEO typically becomes a major shareholder in a startup, but your role and renumeration will be based on the perceived value you bring to the organization. You value someone's contribution through equity when you think that they will be able to add long-term benefits, you would prefer that they don't move company part way through the process, and to keep them from being enticed by a better salary (a reason for equity tied to a vesting arrangement). Another reason is when the company doesn't have salary money available but the potential is very strong. In this situation you should be especially diligent in your analysis because you will realize that even the best laid plans sometimes fall completely short. So to get the best mix, you have to be very real about the company's long-term growth potential, your role in achieving it, and the current liquidity necessary to run the operations. It should also be realized that equity needs to be distributed. You cannot distribute 110% and having your cap table recalculated such that your 5% turns into 1% in order to make room for the newly hired head of technology is rather demotivating for the team. Equity should be used to entice a valuable person to join, stay, and contribute. It should not be used in leu of salary that allows an employee to pay their bills. So, like a lot of questions, the answer is really, it depends. Analyzing the true picture of your long-term potential will allow you to more easily determine the correct mix.DH
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.