Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat percentage of VC funded startups make it to 100m+ revenues in 5 years or less?
This question has no further details.
Answers
100M+ in revenues in 5 years or less does not happen very often.
As an example of one sector, here is an interesting data visualization (circa 2008) of the 100 largest publically traded software companies at that time that shows their actual revenue ramp-ups from SEC filings (only 4 out of these 100 successful companies managed this feat, which themselves are an extremely small percentage of all of the VC-funded software companies):
How Long Does it Take to Build a Technology Empire?
http://ipo-dashboards.com/wordpress/2009/08/how-long-does-it-take-to-build-a-technology-empire/
Key findings excerpted from the link above:
"Only 28% of the nation’s most successful public software empires were rocketships. I’ve defined a rocket ship as a company that reached $50 million in annual sales in 6 years or less (this is the type of growth that typically appears in VC-funded business plans). A hot shot reaches $50m in 7 to 12 years. A slow burner takes 13 years or more. Interestingly, 50% of these companies took 9 or more years to reach $50m in revenue."
There isn't a lot of data on private companies, but here's some rules of thumb for you.
First, most VC-funded startups *never* make it to 100m+ revenue, ever. I'm unclear whether your question is "of the number which do make it, how many make it within 5 years?" or whether it's "of total investments, how many both make it to $100m+ and do so in under 5 years."
SaaS companies now are IPO'ing on less than $100m/yr in revenue anyway (e.g. Marketo), certainly having been around longer than 5 years. So, successful companies (from a VC perspective) don't need to grow as quickly as that anyway per se.
It's very hard to get to that revenue level that quickly. The reason is that early on revenues typically grow slowly, then kick up if the company has reached its stride in both marketing/sales and size of market. But that burns 1-2 years of low revenue.
You might be a $1m-$5m/yr in run-rate revenue after, say, 2 years. Now maybe you're growing fast. A very fast revenue growth rate (not "active users") is 3x/yr, maybe 5-7x/yr if you're starting at $1m -- few companies in the $1m-$5m range ever grow faster. But that only gets you to $15m run-rate by year 3, even at the top end of that range.
Even if you're even more generous and call it $20m run-rate at end of year 3, to get to $100m run-rate in year 5 requires something like 2.5x growth in year 4 ($50m) and then 2x in year 5 ($100m).
But wait, "run-rate" isn't "revenue." And when you're growing that fast, actual revenue in the year is much less than your ending run-rate. So actually we're still not at $100m revenue.
So the bottom line is this almost never happens. It still almost never happens on a run-rate basis.
P.S. My company WP Engine is in fact a company on the top end of this sort of growth rate, so I've seen this first-hand in the past 3.5 years. I see what investors say about our growth rate, and whether they say this is typical or atypical. I also see the challenges it creates internally due to human scale, and I know that growing much faster would probably rip us apart from the inside.
I have been in the money business as a VC and an advisor for over 20 years. Growing from zero to $100 million is slightly more common in Silicon Valley than anywhere else, especially if the companies are backed by top tier VCs. Even so, I would estimate that the number of venture backed companies that go from zero to $100mm in under 5 years is under 5% of the total number of venture backed companies across the country. If you would like to discuss this further, please feel free to get in touch.
My guess would be 0.01%
Only 0.04% of companies founded each year achieve $100 million in annual sales. It can be seen in the following statistic in 2012. As of 2012, there were around 6 million companies in the U.S.
revenue range – – number of companies
$0 to $25M -- 5,640,800
$25M to $100M -- 62,968
$100M to $250M -- 211
$250M to 500M -- 572
$500M to $1B -- 1,069
$1B to $2B -- 500
$2B to $5B -- 152
$5B to $10B -- 53
More than $10B -- 27
Besides if you do have any questions give me a call: https://clarity.fm/joy-brotonath
Related Questions
-
When raising money how much of equity do you give up to keep control? Is it more important to control the board or majority of shares?
It entirely depends on the kind of business you have. If you have a tech startup for example, there are pretty reliable assumptions about each round of funding. And a business plan and financial forecasts are almost totally irrelevant to sophisticated tech investors in the early stages of a company's life. Recent financial history is important if the company is already generating revenue and in that case, a twelve-month projection is also meaningful, but pre-revenue, financial forecasts in tech startups mean nothing. You shouldn't give up more than 10-15% for your first $100,000 and from that point forward, you should budget between 10-20% dilution per each round of subsequent dilution. In a tech startup, you should be more nervous about dilution than control. The reality of it is that until at least a meaningful amount of traction is reached, no one is likely to care about taking control of the venture. If the founding team screws-up, it's likely that there will be very little energy from anyone else in trying to take-over and fix those problems. Kevin is correct in that the board is elected by shareholders but, a board exerts a lot of influence on a company as time goes-on. So board seats shouldn't be given lightly. A single bad or ineffective board member can wreak havoc on a company, especially in the early stages of a company's life. In companies outside of tech, you're likely going to be dealing with valuations that are far lower, thus likely to be impacted with greater dilution and also potentially far more restrictive and onerous investment terms. If your company is a tech company, I'm happy to talk to you about the financing process. I am a startup entrepreneur who has recently raised angel and VC capital and was also formerly a VC as part of a $500,000,000 investment fund investing in every stage of tech and education companies.TW
-
What do (bootstrapped) startups offer to new sales hires? Commission only? What are some good examples to keep people motivated and still survive?
Generally bootstrapped startups should avoid salespeople, for a few reasons: a. they typically can't afford the base and overall comp required to attract sales people who can actually sell / or afford to support them with marketing, management, etc b. it will be very difficult to find the rare person with the right mix of sales and startup DNA along with the critical domain knowledge, consequently the startup is likely to settle c. the founders need to be very involved in the selling and customers will demand it That said, if the plan is still to hire a salesperson, find someone who has demonstrated sales success in startups and is excited by the early stage in company building. Create a comp plan heavily leveraged on sales results (unless you are in an industry where 100% commission is a common practice, would recommend against $0 base as this creates the false impression that your hire isn't passing time with one company while looking for another job with a richer comp plan - you want your rep focussed). Sell the vision and opportunity to be part of a growth story. I have written a several blog posts on hiring sales people into start-ups. You might find these useful: http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/ceo-question-should-i-learn-to-sell-or-hire-a-sales-person/ http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/start-up-sales-and-hiring-advice-dont-stop-selling-once-you-hire-your-first-sales-rep/ http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/hiring-start-up-sales-reps/ http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/startups-and-salespeople/ Good luck!EB
-
how to start earning on clarity.fm
Most of the earnings come from the people you are in contact with. The platform is not that big at the moment but it can be earned. My recommendation is to create content on your private page web, facebook, instagram ... and leave a clarity link through your work. If you need extra help call me for 15 minutes.DB
-
For every success story in Silicon Valley, how many are there that fail?
It all depends on what one decides to be a definition of a "success story." For some entrepreneurs, it might be getting acqui-hired, for some -- a $10M exit, for some -- a $200M exit, and for others -- an IPO. Based on the numbers I have anecdotally heard in conversations over the last decade or so, VCs fund about 1 in 350 ventures they see, and of all of these funded ventures, only about 1 in 10 become really successful (i.e. have a big exit or a successful IPO.) So you are looking at a 1 in 3500 chance of eventual venture success among all of the companies that try to get VC funding. (To put this number in perspective, US VCs invest in about 3000-3500 companies every year.) In addition, there might be a few others (say, maybe another 1-2 in every 10 companies that get VC investments) that get "decent" exits along the way, and hence could be categorized as somewhat successful depending on, again, how one chooses to define what qualifies as a "success story." Finally, there might also be companies that may never need or get around to seeking VC funding. One can, of course, find holes in the simplifying assumptions I have made here, but it doesn't really matter if that number instead is 1 in 1000 or 1 in 10000. The basic point being made here is just that the odds are heavily stacked against new ventures being successful. But that's also one of the distinguishing characteristics of entrepreneurs -- to go ahead and try to bring their idea to life despite the heavy odds. Sources of some of the numbers: http://www.nvca.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ven... https://www.pwcmoneytree.com/MTP... http://paulgraham.com/future.html Here are others' calculations of the odds that lead to a similar conclusion: 1.Dear Entrepreneurs: Here's How Bad Your Odds Of Success Are http://www.businessinsider.com/startup-odds-of-success-2013-5 2.Why 99.997% Of Entrepreneurs May Want To Postpone Or Avoid VC -- Even If You Can Get It http://www.forbes.com/sites/dileeprao/2013/07/29/why-99-997-of-entrepreneurs-may-want-to-postpone-or-avoid-vc-even-if-you-can-get-it/MB
-
What is a normal churn rate for b2b saas company with an average monthly revenue of $850 per customer? Is 10% of the total monthly sales high or low?
10% of the total monthly sales churning on an absolute basis is near fatal. That means that within 5 months, you have 50% absolute churn per year, which reveals fundamental flaws with the service itself. Anything above small single digit churn is telling you and your team that customers are not seeing enough value in your product. I'd start by doing as many exit interviews as you can with those that have churned out, including, offers to reengage at a lower price-point while you fix the issues that matter to them. Happy to talk through this in more detail in a call.TW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.