Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat questions should we have our employees answer each week in a standard "wrap up" email to management?
Answers
I think that it would be important to answer the following questions.
* Who comes up with the "thoughtful questions"? And are they new every week?
* Who is responsible for the answering of these questions?
* What is the pace of the start-up?
* Will every team's concerns / progress / roadblocks / setbacks be relevant to management?
* How much time should each team spend on developing its response (related to point 2)?
* "...help employees feel heard, ..." - How do you plan to measure this?
* Is a weekly cadence the right pace?
** Can teams align their "wrap-up" with their natural development cycles (this is more relevant if the company is a technology company)?
* Will these wrap-ups be relevant to other teams?
Answering these questions can help develop how relevant these emails are both to employees and to management.
This seems like a good idea initially, but I think you'll find it's incomplete.
Here's the problem: for the employee, sticking their neck out and telling the truth is a potentially career-limiting move.
So they will never tell you the full open truth.
From experience, the best format is to use an impartial intermediary the employees do not report to, and whose stake is not in management's way of doing things.
Then employees can open up.
Why do you think Suggestion Boxes are anonymous?
I have served as advisor to some HR managers and growing startups on these issues, and we have found that the first principle is guaranteed anonymity for any software-initiated polls. While open ended answers give more data, they also open the employee up to identification and pollutes our information.
Best approach is a mix of in person approach and online polling, the personal touch allows for people to share attitudes they didn't even know they had. That of course requires a specifically trained staff, so online methods are preferred by industry.
This polling would be better aligned with events and important dates rather than periodic weekly intervals to prevent a "punch a button" feeling.
I'd be happy to elaborate more on best practices for polling in a call and show how even the in person methods can be introduced to complement them!
I believe this "send to management" idea will create hierarchy issues within your team and will limit your employees providing honest feedback to the "management"
Try this;
Each Friday afternoon work stops for 2 hrs. Everybody gets together, office turned to a social venue. Sandwich, Pizzas, Drinks (arrange as you wish) afternoon tea or even lunch
-First two weeks nobody will speak but its your job to open the conversation, talk and ask questions. They must be comfortable. Answer questions in front of them so they are comfortable approaching you, avoid confrontation reply later in private
-Talk about the past week, figures and plans next week, talk to top performing employees, share their story, tell a funny story from last week, talk about markets, share your opinions
-You can ask to prepare questions submit before the meeting or they can ask you during the meeting
-After a month this becomes a ritual, people will need to brings cakes etc,... team spirit.. ideas will flow and have a great impact on your business
-Be careful, if people asking questions about how to do their job, there is a training problem.
-if you are looking for a online survey, just buy one of from internet..if you are looking for a real-time chat platform buy one of from internet, if you are looking for a mail distribution use your email client
-Your employees is everything to you, make sure you interact with them
I would keep it as simple as possible. The more complex it is, the more likely employees will give up.
My advice; 4 categories;
Positive: what is going well this week/month...?
Negative: what is not going well?
Comments: neither positive or negative but worth mentioning
Actions: what do they want to do or want the management to do?
That's it...
Steven
Some great comments and suggestions here. I am often involved with such things since I Coach Executives and their direct reports. Anonymity is King at the outset. How employees experience almost every aspect of how you set the stage and then conduct this will determine how well it works. Simple is better. Three samples might be...
What is most getting in your way this week?
Who deserves an Award for what they did this week?
What have you been measuring this week?
And by all means somehow publish all the responses you get from whatever method you use
We've been now running Weekdone.com weekly team status updates and reporting service for over 3 years. Here is my experience.
First decide if the information you want to get is task-oriented or more about open-ended feedback questions. First is more item oriented (our standard template is PPP as used in Ebay, Skype et al meaning Plans, Progress, Problems). The second is based on questions to have employees open up. Here is one blog post I did on 10 questions I've seen that work well among our users: https://blog.weekdone.com/10-questions-to-ask-your-employees-today/
The key to get the process working well is by the way feedback and replies from you to employees, based on what they report. If you make it a one-way black hole from employees to managers it rarely works. It has to be 2-way communication. That's where many leaders fail. Without that employees take the attitude that nobody reads the updates and no changes are made by you and other managers.
Related Questions
-
From your experience, what are the 'key' rules to building a great team for the long-term?
Your question is very interesting and gives me a feeling you have a real commitment for success because it makes me feel you care for your team. If this question could be fully answered in a couple of lines, you can imagine all managers and executives would lead their teams successfully. The 2 key principles to remember are: 1. Everyone is different: you have to adapt to each individual. It is time consuming but pays off in the long run because everyone has their own learning styles, speed and attitude. Take the time to have 1:1 conversations about them as individuals: likes and dislikes, under what conditions they perform best, how they learn most easily and about their career goals. 2. Create a team spirit. This is the exact opposite of point 1: as much as you recognize everyone as individuals, you have to also build unity and cohesion. There has to be standardized rules of behavior, common values and a shared vision. You have to take time with your team as a whole. This will lead you to create: 1. A personal development plan for each individual in your team, which helps you develop a tailored approach for each person, create reward & recognition systems and monitor people's happiness and performance. This helps you understand your team from a micro-perspective. 2. An organizational development plan for your start-up to give you a more global vision of the talents you need to acquire, retain and grow. This helps you understand your team from a macro-perspective. Team building requires taking time for all the different aspects of bonding: forming, storming, norming, performing, mourning. It's always about balancing two extremes: On one hand you want to take time to work together and alone, to learn & grow, to brainstorm, to create, to plan, to prepare, to research and to measure performance. On the other hand you, you also want to take time away from the office to stop & think, take time to have fun, take time to get to know each other, take time to rest & relax. Do you need any guidance to build individual and organizational development plans that will support growth and team building for your start-up?NK
-
How does a bootstrapping startup organize an exceptional team with no budget?
This is a typical problem with any start-up, i.e. intention to trade everything for equity. I am assuming that you're trying to trade equity for cash. In that case I would suggest you to look out for individuals with diversified skills and competencies. The reason being, less the number of individuals less the amount of equity that would be required to trade. Second option could be to look out for agencies to whom you could outsource the business process. I am not at all ashamed to mention that my own company is one such agency. However, my only piece of advice to to try and add some retainership component to your model, apart from equity, as in a long term it's easier for people to lose motivation in absence of any capital gains. The reason being, people don't understand the value of equity in startup. Rather, the time it could take for that equity to turn into something big; it may not happen as well. That's why they say there's nothing called free lunch. In my more than a decade experience working with entrepreneurs and helping them bootstrap, I have learnt that the market out there is crowded with individuals with a lust to join startup as a equity holder. In a short term, they may speak all those rosy language that may sound like coming directly from the Horse's mouth. But, in a long term you realize not everything is hunky-dory. As far as finding a co-founder or a CTO or any other executive team member is concerned, ensure that you put down the roles and responsibilities attached with each title. Apart from above, ensure that you communicate your expectation lucidly and understand the values everyone is required to bring on the table. Usual people who could be a good fit for you, apart from any agency, are people who aren't big on title. Is there anything specific you're looking at? Please feel free to revert with more clarity to receive clarity. I am just a call away. All the best!!SB
-
Should I ask for equity when joining a startup? When/how? (And whom should I call via Clarity?)
If the team has aspirations to build a venture backeable business (i.e. Raise money for equity), then of course you should ask. Ask the CEO if he has a ESOP (Employee Stock Option Plan), and if it's part of the compensation package. You're allowed to ask. As for the right person on Clarity, pretty much anyone in this list https://clarity.fm/browse/raising-capital/venture-capital Tom seems to be fast to respond.DM
-
What is your advice for building a team of like-minded individuals to help start your business?
I'm a feelance CFO and I work actively with early stage companies. I've been at this for almost 30 years. Some of my current and recent clients wrestle actively with this very questions. My advice is to have the tough conversations right up front, early in the team building process. This usually consists of answering questions like, "who's in charge and what does that really mean," "who gets how much of the company and when and in exchange for what," "what are you, you and you really bringing to the table in terms of skills and cash," and "who is really in a life situation that will allow them to sustain their commitment to the business?" Any team that can get through these questions can get through the trials of surviving startup. I'm happy to talk with you directly about these issues and, in particular, to help look at them through a strategic financial planning lens.HD
-
Need some advice on how to build a team, and determining what kind of talent I need?
A great team looks like this - 2 full stack engineers. They can manage servers, security, build features and code front end JS/interactions. - 1 visual designer focused on product, information architecture, UX and flows. - 1 front end developer who can take designs and built out killer interactions and can wireup any back end code to the UI The CEO can manage product + customer development and everyone on the team does support. That's 5 people and can accomplish a lot!DM
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.