Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat questions should we have our employees answer each week in a standard "wrap up" email to management?
Answers
I think that it would be important to answer the following questions.
* Who comes up with the "thoughtful questions"? And are they new every week?
* Who is responsible for the answering of these questions?
* What is the pace of the start-up?
* Will every team's concerns / progress / roadblocks / setbacks be relevant to management?
* How much time should each team spend on developing its response (related to point 2)?
* "...help employees feel heard, ..." - How do you plan to measure this?
* Is a weekly cadence the right pace?
** Can teams align their "wrap-up" with their natural development cycles (this is more relevant if the company is a technology company)?
* Will these wrap-ups be relevant to other teams?
Answering these questions can help develop how relevant these emails are both to employees and to management.
This seems like a good idea initially, but I think you'll find it's incomplete.
Here's the problem: for the employee, sticking their neck out and telling the truth is a potentially career-limiting move.
So they will never tell you the full open truth.
From experience, the best format is to use an impartial intermediary the employees do not report to, and whose stake is not in management's way of doing things.
Then employees can open up.
Why do you think Suggestion Boxes are anonymous?
I have served as advisor to some HR managers and growing startups on these issues, and we have found that the first principle is guaranteed anonymity for any software-initiated polls. While open ended answers give more data, they also open the employee up to identification and pollutes our information.
Best approach is a mix of in person approach and online polling, the personal touch allows for people to share attitudes they didn't even know they had. That of course requires a specifically trained staff, so online methods are preferred by industry.
This polling would be better aligned with events and important dates rather than periodic weekly intervals to prevent a "punch a button" feeling.
I'd be happy to elaborate more on best practices for polling in a call and show how even the in person methods can be introduced to complement them!
I believe this "send to management" idea will create hierarchy issues within your team and will limit your employees providing honest feedback to the "management"
Try this;
Each Friday afternoon work stops for 2 hrs. Everybody gets together, office turned to a social venue. Sandwich, Pizzas, Drinks (arrange as you wish) afternoon tea or even lunch
-First two weeks nobody will speak but its your job to open the conversation, talk and ask questions. They must be comfortable. Answer questions in front of them so they are comfortable approaching you, avoid confrontation reply later in private
-Talk about the past week, figures and plans next week, talk to top performing employees, share their story, tell a funny story from last week, talk about markets, share your opinions
-You can ask to prepare questions submit before the meeting or they can ask you during the meeting
-After a month this becomes a ritual, people will need to brings cakes etc,... team spirit.. ideas will flow and have a great impact on your business
-Be careful, if people asking questions about how to do their job, there is a training problem.
-if you are looking for a online survey, just buy one of from internet..if you are looking for a real-time chat platform buy one of from internet, if you are looking for a mail distribution use your email client
-Your employees is everything to you, make sure you interact with them
I would keep it as simple as possible. The more complex it is, the more likely employees will give up.
My advice; 4 categories;
Positive: what is going well this week/month...?
Negative: what is not going well?
Comments: neither positive or negative but worth mentioning
Actions: what do they want to do or want the management to do?
That's it...
Steven
Some great comments and suggestions here. I am often involved with such things since I Coach Executives and their direct reports. Anonymity is King at the outset. How employees experience almost every aspect of how you set the stage and then conduct this will determine how well it works. Simple is better. Three samples might be...
What is most getting in your way this week?
Who deserves an Award for what they did this week?
What have you been measuring this week?
And by all means somehow publish all the responses you get from whatever method you use
We've been now running Weekdone.com weekly team status updates and reporting service for over 3 years. Here is my experience.
First decide if the information you want to get is task-oriented or more about open-ended feedback questions. First is more item oriented (our standard template is PPP as used in Ebay, Skype et al meaning Plans, Progress, Problems). The second is based on questions to have employees open up. Here is one blog post I did on 10 questions I've seen that work well among our users: https://blog.weekdone.com/10-questions-to-ask-your-employees-today/
The key to get the process working well is by the way feedback and replies from you to employees, based on what they report. If you make it a one-way black hole from employees to managers it rarely works. It has to be 2-way communication. That's where many leaders fail. Without that employees take the attitude that nobody reads the updates and no changes are made by you and other managers.
Related Questions
-
What does your a team look like for a software company of ten or less people? Or, how do you think it should be?
Instead of looking at who does what .. why not look at the things that need to get done for a small techology team. Product: 6 people - 3 full stack engineers - 2 front end developers - 1 designer / product person Marketing & Community, 1 person - Full time hire, or CEO Support & Operations, 1 person - Part time hire, or CEO + Whole team I believe it's important for everyone on the team to help with support. Also, if you have a great product, then support shouldn't be that taxing. Q&A is usually needed when you have a bad development process (no unit testing or continuous integration deployments). Outsource everything else. - Bookeeping - HR stuff - Legal - Government program paperwork Hope that helps. P.S. I would put as many people on product as that's where you'll get the most bang for your buck.DM
-
Should I ask for equity when joining a startup? When/how? (And whom should I call via Clarity?)
If the team has aspirations to build a venture backeable business (i.e. Raise money for equity), then of course you should ask. Ask the CEO if he has a ESOP (Employee Stock Option Plan), and if it's part of the compensation package. You're allowed to ask. As for the right person on Clarity, pretty much anyone in this list https://clarity.fm/browse/raising-capital/venture-capital Tom seems to be fast to respond.DM
-
What is your advice for building a team of like-minded individuals to help start your business?
I'm a feelance CFO and I work actively with early stage companies. I've been at this for almost 30 years. Some of my current and recent clients wrestle actively with this very questions. My advice is to have the tough conversations right up front, early in the team building process. This usually consists of answering questions like, "who's in charge and what does that really mean," "who gets how much of the company and when and in exchange for what," "what are you, you and you really bringing to the table in terms of skills and cash," and "who is really in a life situation that will allow them to sustain their commitment to the business?" Any team that can get through these questions can get through the trials of surviving startup. I'm happy to talk with you directly about these issues and, in particular, to help look at them through a strategic financial planning lens.HD
-
How does a bootstrapping startup organize an exceptional team with no budget?
This is a typical problem with any start-up, i.e. intention to trade everything for equity. I am assuming that you're trying to trade equity for cash. In that case I would suggest you to look out for individuals with diversified skills and competencies. The reason being, less the number of individuals less the amount of equity that would be required to trade. Second option could be to look out for agencies to whom you could outsource the business process. I am not at all ashamed to mention that my own company is one such agency. However, my only piece of advice to to try and add some retainership component to your model, apart from equity, as in a long term it's easier for people to lose motivation in absence of any capital gains. The reason being, people don't understand the value of equity in startup. Rather, the time it could take for that equity to turn into something big; it may not happen as well. That's why they say there's nothing called free lunch. In my more than a decade experience working with entrepreneurs and helping them bootstrap, I have learnt that the market out there is crowded with individuals with a lust to join startup as a equity holder. In a short term, they may speak all those rosy language that may sound like coming directly from the Horse's mouth. But, in a long term you realize not everything is hunky-dory. As far as finding a co-founder or a CTO or any other executive team member is concerned, ensure that you put down the roles and responsibilities attached with each title. Apart from above, ensure that you communicate your expectation lucidly and understand the values everyone is required to bring on the table. Usual people who could be a good fit for you, apart from any agency, are people who aren't big on title. Is there anything specific you're looking at? Please feel free to revert with more clarity to receive clarity. I am just a call away. All the best!!SB
-
There is a person working with you who has great skills but doesn't fit the culture, how far would you go with trying to help this person to change?
Backwards. I'd make sure that person didn't stay in the company. "One dirty fish muddies the whole pond" It's not personal or malicious - they're just not the right fit. A great skill set, while very important is always secondary to cultural fit if you really want your company to flourish.KM
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.