Loading...
Answers
MenuI want to partner with resellers to increase distribution of my SAAS product. Should I split the all-commodity volume (ACV) with resellers?
I have a SAAS product with monthly subscription of $300 per user. I'm thinking of working with resellers where we split the annual contract value with them. We give $75 per user to the underlying platform provider. I am thinking of splitting the rest of $225 such that they get to keep a portion of our contract.
Perhaps they could keep $50 per user. What are your thoughts on this arrangement? Will it work? The reseller gets ACV, and we get a portion of the revenue.
Answers
TALK TO THEM.
No one cares about your product.
I don't say that meanly. No one cares about MY products, either. I'm saying it to make a jarring point.
You know what they DO care about?
Things they they make, or already sell, that are making them most of the money they bring in NOW.
And your product is not doing that.
Therefore...(wait for it)...you don't have a real partnership with your resellers.
Not yet.
Apply our friend, the 80/20 Rule.
80% of your reseller sales (or thereabouts) come from 20% (or so) of your reseller partners.
They are *already* doing a good job for you.
They are *already* committed to your product.
They are *already* seeing decent revenue generated by their sales of your product.
Get the picture?
If you don't have reseller agreements with anyone yet, look for resellers successfully bringing in significant-to-them revenue with similar-type products to yours. Not identical. Similar.
Forget about the rest, for now anyway.
These productive few are the ones to get those sit-down meetings with.
And don't "present".
Ask THEM what THEY would be motivated by.
Don't GUESS.
Find out.
You can adjust that. It's negotiation.
But starting from that baseline, rather than yours, is preferable and effective.
And if they tell you, "We don't believe amping up the resources on pushing your product will result in a good-enough reward," ... now you KNOW.
Now you have a real symptom to deal with.
Numbers are great, but emotional involvement is better. One follows the other, and I think before you read this, you had it the wrong way around.
This can be a solid approach. I would recommend that the reseller and platform provider get similar deals, to keep consistency.
There are many platforms out that there allow for affiliated links and vendors that can sell your software as well, I suggest you take a look at this as an option as well.
Ensure that you have a reasonable profit margin as part of the incentive process as there could be additional time commitments, extra costs, etc. that come up as part of implementation.
Related Questions
-
Do I need to hire a "growth hacker" or "growth marketer?" What's the difference?
Anyone who calls themselves something fancy like that is probably one of the 99% in the industry that have no idea what they are doing and will make you hemorrhage money. Find a MARKETER with a proven track record and use them to build an empire. If you don't want an empire and, instead, want to make your friends jealous by bragging about "new hires," then hire a "growth hacker" or "assistant of hardcore development" or "rad visualization chairman" or whatever other stupid position all these failing startups get caught on.AM
-
What are the SaaS B2B expectations when paying annually - annual paid annually or annual paid monthly? Is a discount necessary (i.e. 20%)?
Most Software as a service vendors generally don't book annual deals except in highly specialized cases. Most customers prefer to be able to cancel/change anytime they choose. Also, deals done "offline" end up actually often being more trouble than they are worth to administrate especially for a $2988 ticket. Generally, companies don't view prepaying for SaaS products a year in advance as a "convenience" (to them) so if the debate is internal (not customer driven), I'd set this debate aside until it's requested by the customer. Most customers will request a discount to pre-pay annual service. Happy to talk this through with you in a call, to work through the specifics of your situation in more detail.TW
-
How has Uber grown so fast?
Obviously, they do the fundamentals well. Good brand. Good experience. Good word of mouth. Good PR. Etc. Etc. But after my interview with Ryan Graves, the head of Global Operations at Uber (https://www.growthhacker.tv/ryan-graves), it became clear that they are operationally advanced and this is a huge part of their success. I'll explain. Uber isn't just a single startup, it's essentially dozens of startups rolled into one because every time they enter a new city they have to establish themselves from essentially nothing (except whatever brand equity has reached the city ahead of them). This means finding/training drivers, marketing to consumers, and building out local staff to manage operations for that city. This is where Ryan Graves comes in. He has a protocol of everything that must be done, and in what order, and by who, to ensure the best chance of success in a new city. So how has Uber grown so fast? Essentially, they figured out how to grow in one locale and were relentless about refining their launch process to recreate that initial success over and over in new cities. No plan works for every city, and they've had to adapt in many situations, but it is still a driving factor for their success.BT
-
How do I grow from a one man startup when I don't have the money to hire & don't have skills or time for investors?
Stop thinking you don't have the skills to do something. You can learn anything if you decide to, but assuming up front that you can't (forever) is dangerous. my2centsDM
-
How was SnapChat able to grow so quickly?
I'm answering your question assuming that you hope to be able to replicate it's own success in your own mobile app. There are a couple of factors responsible for it's growth that are instructive to anyone building a mobile app. "Leveraging the intimacy and privacy of the mobile phone." We now have an *intimate* relationship with our phone like no other device in the history of technology. Every internet company that started before around 2010 has built their core interactions around "the old web" one which was accessed primarily via a browser on a computer. Companies that start with a clean slate, should be building their interactions around how to do whatever the app is supposed to do while leveraging what is unique to people's relationship to their mobile devices. Photo-sharing has become a core part of the way we communicate now. Snapchat built something that provided an experience that leveraged the feeling of privacy and intimacy that is unique to mobile. "Provided an escape from the "maturity" of other online services." Too many parents, aunts, uncles and other "old people" have encroached into the social networks of teens and young people. As a result, they've had a desire to find places to express themselves in places inaccessible by older generations. An important distinction is that it's not just parents and relatives that young people are trying to avoid, but also employers & colleges who are increasingly using "mature" social networks to review applicants. "Leveraged PR even bad PR" The fact that the app got so much press about it being used to sext was perfect PR for the company, as it essentially reinforced the brand experience that it has today. Essentially, "if it's safe enough to send a sext, it's safe for any kind of communication I want to have." And although the safety and security of Snapchat is actually not as advertised, it still enjoys the reputation of having less impact than any primarily web-based service. Building a successful mobile application is one of the hardest challenges to face designers, programmers and entrepreneurs in the history of writing software. Happy to talk to you if you're considering building a mobile app, about what I've learned about the "table stakes" for success.TW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.