Loading...
Answers
MenuWhy would it be more convenient to have a .com domain rather than a .co
We started as a .co
A while after we bought the .com
Now we are considering if we should change everything we've built to the .com domain
Are there any benefits in terms of SEO or similar?
Answers
From a SEO perspective the domain shouldn't really make any difference - or at least not a major one. As Google often emphasizes they try to rank by relevance for the user. There's one main exception, which would be ccTLDs (country level domains). And while .CO is a ccTLD, it's considered a generic domain by Google.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1347922?hl=en
There were some TLDs that would negatively affect ranking, but .CO wasn't one of them.
I do think you should always try to own the .COM though - as domains get passed on by many means, i.e. word of mouth etc. Users are used to seeing/hearing .COM more so than .CO, so they might just try to visit the .COM instead of going to your site.
Frank Michlick is correct when he says that your .CO would be treated by Google as a gTLD (i.e. like .COM) rather than as the country code for Colombia. So there would be no SEO advantage that I'm aware of in switching to .COM.
That doesn't mean that there is no reason to switch to .COM. After all, SEO isn't the only factor.
Usually the biggest disadvantage to .CO is that the extension is misremembered as .COM, which can result in customer confusion and traffic leakage to another website or non-resolving page.
Now that you have purchased the .COM, you are able to plug the leak by means of a redirect. So that .CO disadvantage is curable without a full-fledged changeover to the new domain and .COM rebrand.
Another potential disadvantage to .CO is that it sometimes looks like a cheap second choice, which affects brand credibility. More often than not, the biggest, most established, and trustworthy brands use .COM. As consumers, we're trained to instinctively spot flimsy websites BEFORE we visit them; so we respond differently based on the TLD.
After all, if a brand / website / company is cutting corners with its most visible identifier – the domain – then what other issues are they neglecting? We have that gut reaction to domains with hyphens, misspellings, or 2nd-choice suffixes. And, although it is merely a gut reaction, it is rational as a general rule, since it is reinforced by the broader population of websites.
Rebranding as .COM might make the brand appear more reputable. Depending on the name itself, that might be more or less important. I think some .CO domains look fine, actually. I can give my opinion on yours in about 60 seconds.
There is some short-term cost in changing over to .COM after having already built on .CO. Meanwhile there is some long-term benefit from a branding perspective. You'll have to weigh that tradeoff. Since you already purchased the .COM, though, my thought is that you ought to use it fully.
Rule of thumb for me is always secure the .com I've used both many times and found no advantage or disadvantage with regard to SEO. I never base my actions on SEO as it's such a fluid science that changes in a major way about every 6 months. A .com is always best. A .co will give you a startup/tech appearance as will a .io domain.
One thing you get with a .co are tons of perks with partner companies, events etc....they really have some great perks unlike so lesser user perks programs like for example found on klout.com
Related Questions
-
For SEO, is it better to use sub-directories or sub-domains when geo-targeting by country?
I have been working in SEO for over 10 years and have built search agencies from the ground up. I've also worked with some big brands on International SEO like Active.com, as well as many US based chains like Extended Stay Hotels. I suggest sub-directories as they are MUCH easier to manage and promote via SEO. You can't have specific local IPs with sub-directories, but you can with sub-domains. But that's not hyper critical, there are WAY more important factors. Plus, you can geo-target in Google Webmaster Tools. Your current structure for sub-directories is perfect: http://drivingtests101.com/Canada/Ontario With subdomains, each will be treated like a brand new site. So you would have to work very hard to get each to gain good authority SEO-wise. Plus managing and hosting lots of subdomains is a ton of work! In order to not get penalized you need to: Implement the the "lang" and "hreflang" tags in the HTML of each country directory and all pages within. Have unique Title tags and descriptions written in each language. Have unique content for each country and state page. Written in each respective language. Yes, its a TON of work but hey, you are trying to take over the world! If you are serious about international search traffic then you will do these things and the costs should be balanced out with the extra traffic you'll get. If you can make the root domain super authoritative then it will boost ALL of the internal pages. This is also key to ranking well for international search. I'm open to a follow up call to elaborate on any of my responses or to answer other questions.MS
-
My business offers two different types of services. Should I combine them in one webpage, or create two?
Two key concerns are 1. Customer confusion with the 2 offerings: Imagine being in an art gallery that sells photography training and fine art or a book store that tries to sell you fine art. Even if it's the same group of people, they may be in very different mind-sets and hence may not associate both together. 2. SEO challenges with mixed messages you're sending. Which keywords would you optimize for which part of the site? Advantage would be if the customer base is the same group of people, hence offering cross-sell opportunities. For instance, if your MAIN source of leads for the training site is the art site, then this would be more important. In general, I would suggest one site for one customer group. If there is likely to be a very high overlap, then same site, with multiple sub-sites might work. In matter of fact, it'll probably be EASIER to do two sites for this than one site. Your designer will thank you :) Then tastefully add cross-links in the places where someone is likely to use them. For instance the art gallery could have a post 'How I make art' and links to your other business there. And the photog training site would have your art pics with subtle on-image links to your art biz. While I'm not a branding expert, I do find that my engineering lead approach to challenges in Marketing/Sales usually works, and provides clarity and direction.PK
-
Will redesigning a website (ground up) ruin the search ranking of a site?
TL;DR -> Yes you will risk it if you don't perform a proper audit and migration from the original platform. Any type of architecture changes can 100% ruin your SEO if you are not migrating content and topics correctly. Many people assume this is limited to URI structure but underestimate the power of Topical hierarchy and the content, internal linking and URI structure which play a crucial role into any migration effort. If you have any questions about the migration process, give me a shout. Decent free migration checklist: https://searchengineland.com/site-migration-seo-checklist-dont-lose-traffic-286880TM
-
How Google can index/reindex my page as quickest as possible, as and where there is some change happen in the content?
Hi, Your site is a Q&A so I presume that every time someone create a new Question it will generate a unique URL for that. Indepentend if you have or not an answer you want Google to crawl and index your site as quick as possible to start to analyzing the new page and bring traffic to it. The best way to expedite this "re-crawling" is to use a ping service that you can trigger after your user answer the question. PS: If you site is updated frequently you shouldn't have a problem with crawling, because Google usually identify this type of website really quick. Drop me a call is free for this week. Best,YM
-
How can I convince a client to sign up a 12 month SEO contract?
The best way to work around something like this is to map out the long-term strategy in phases. Build out a brief project map that outlines what they will receive within the 1-3 month period, the 4-7 month and the 8-12 month period. Set micro objectives for each period and this will give the client a bit more confidence in the short-term plans as well as the long. The key thing to remember here is that the client will often be worried about being tied into a contract that doesn't deliver results. As a result, you need to show why you need the time that you do. One thing that I often throw in is an extra incentive for longer contract lengths - for example, an extra PR/content campaign or some paid advertising extras. Try to assure them of some shorter term results that you can obtain as 'quick wins' and build their confidence this way - the major targets will always be longer term but if you can demonstrate that there will be progress between then they will be a lot more receptive.MH
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.