Loading...
Answers
MenuHow do you handle an employee that's proving to be a poor culture fit?
What do you do when you realize one of your employees is a poor culture fit when you're a small startup and every employee feels so integral?
Answers
Your Team will have a direct impact on whether or not you will succeed as a business.
I know exactly how hard it can be, especially when peoples lives are in your hands. Even more so if you outsource, outsourcing might seem cheap by our standards but that money goes a long way overseas, so usually one employee is paying for their entire family back home in their village.
But you as a boss have a responsibility to all your staff, each one of them relies on you and a poor employee that lets the team down, is letting the company down and putting every at risk.
Selecting your team is one of the most important parts of any startup
You have not only invested your money, but your time and your life. If someone has getting in the way of that, and you have given them every opportunity to improve. You cant feel bad, you need to remove them and rehire. When you have the right person you will know. A motivated and hardworking employee will work for the business and not for their pay check.
Get rid of em, the sooner the better. You are doing yourself, and the employee a disservice by keeping them around.
First ask yourself: "Have I clearly defined our company's culture with a set of written Core Values?"
If the answer is no, then do that first. (create a document)
Next list everyone's name on a spreadsheet and have a column for each cultural core value.
Rate each employee as a:
1- typically does not display this Core Value
2- sometimes displays this Core Value (but typically not when under pressure)
3- usually displays this Core Value
Ask each employee to rate themselves and to rate you. (You do the same for each of them). Then have one on one meetings, and be clear that you are having them with everyone and that everyone has opportunity for growth, including yourself.
When you meet with this individual follow this pattern:
1) This is what I am experiencing
Provide one or two examples. Remember this has nothing to do with Task Execution...most employees who are a poor cultural fit will revert to listing of the task lists that they are good at executing. Remind them that this has nothing to do with Task Execution, something you are pleased with. But the position at the company is equal parts Task Execution + Core Value Alignment. Today you are only speaking about Core Value Alignment.
2) This is my contribution to the problem
This is probably not a new problem. Your contribution may simply be that you have noticed this issue for awhile and failed to address it. Apologize for not communicating it sooner because if you had then this could already be resolved by now. Let the employee know that from this point forward you are completely committed to helping them achieve Core Value Alignment
3) Tell the employee what is at stake.
If core value alignment isn't important to them, then it isn't the right fit to continue working here. You will really miss the abilities they have brought to the table but since that is only half of the equation then you both will need to move forward. You believe that someone with their abilities can be a tremendous asset to the company if Core Value alignment is achieved.
4) Tell the employee how you will help them resolve this
-"I am asking for this to be better, and I am going to hold you to a pretty high standard so that over the next 4 weeks you can completely align with our company Core Values. Are you ok with that?"
-"I get the feeling this is Solvable (or Not)"
-"I get the feeling that this is a change that you need to make and not me, is that accurate?"
-"I do not want to force you into anything. If you choose to work towards aligning yourself with our company's Core Values then I want to support your plan. I want you to share with me a 1 page plan that outlines areas within the Core Values that need your attention and states a plan for growth"
*NEXT set a timeline: "I would like to support you in getting this started right away, would next monday be too soon to have this written out..ok can we agree on next wednesday then? Perfect, I will look forward to meeting with you next wednesday to review your plan" (THEY OWN IT!! very important)
5) Ask for feedback!
"Please share with me your thoughts and opinions regarding what we have spoken about today, I AM Listening"
*SEEK TO UNDERSTAND instead of just telling him/her everything..do Not seek to be understood.
-"Why do you think you have given this impression?"
-"Do you think there is anything you do that might make someone feel like you didn't value this Core Value?"
THERE WILL BE PUSHBACK: Hardworking employees who lack Core Value alignment will pushback hard with how effective and good they are. IT IS IMPORTANT to acknowledge that they: Are an important employee, they do make a big contribution. But tell them that "You are measuring in terms of results, but I am speaking in terms of values"
I have had this conversation 4 times. 2 times the person saved their own job and are Still employed by my company. 2 times the person came to the conclusion that they did not fit our company any more. There was a strong paper trail, and the separation was clearly based on Values instead of Results...which can help you support your reasons for firing should there be any repercussions.
WHEN FIRING:
ALWAYS: seek to honor the good things that have occurred as a result of their employment
NEVER: say that this is really hard for you, that is a selfish statement, this is their time to grieve the loss of a job. It is not comforting even though that is the intention of your comment.
I really hope this helps!! It is a hard step to go through but doing this well can have a positive effect on every other employee on your team. Since they each had a meeting with you as well...it underlines the importance of Core Value (Cultural) alignment and unifies the team.
You address it immediately and help that person find a more appropriate fit. You'll both benefit in the end. Don't feel guilty - the faster you sort out who adds value around you, the faster you'll get to where you want to go. The only way you find this out is by trying each other out. It takes a great leader to recognize there is culture fit - and you can be sure you will recognize this in interviewing future candidates and not make this mistake ever again.
Kelly is right, address it immediately. I also recommend you read Alex Turnbull, the founder of Groove, blog about it at https://www.groovehq.com/blog/how-to-fire-an-employee
You should talk to the individual and try to find out what's creating a poor fit. On another note, cultural fit is often discriminatory in practical scenario. Hence, I would like to know what's your definition of "Culture" and "Culture Fit" before advising anything further. Perception in such cases could easily get driven by stereotypes.
Would, also like to see your sanity checklist. Hope above helps!!
i've been in such situation..
So just tell hir so. If you're in generous mood, give hir a week (or 2?) to switch. But it'll probably be a waste.
btw, consult the team about it. If they also say s/he's more trouble than helping, then bye-bye. You cannot afford "negative" performance - someone reducing others performance in this or that way. The team might be better without hir - more work to do but at least no fake stuff..
The firsts thing to try to do is reach out the employee and see if there are issues with communication or expectations that can be resolved to help the employee be a better fit. From there if the problem isn't solvable I would start to slowly isolate the employee and manage them out. If they do anything that impacts the integrity of the business or are preventing you from properly moving forward, terminate.
That is always difficult. In my experience that can be a killer in a small environment in many ways. I suggest dealing with it quickly and honestly. Do you see an opportunity for the person to adapt or is there no hope? Sit down with the person outside the office to have a genuine conversation about your concern and hear them out. It may be appropriate based on the outcome of your discussion to give a certain time period to allow them to implement your feedback, or it may be best to part ways quickly. Either way, always remember that leaders get the behavior they tolerate, good or bad. Nipping this in the bud will help the team members who are a great fit see you value their input and keep them motivated.
Best of luck!
Related Questions
-
For every success story in Silicon Valley, how many are there that fail?
It all depends on what one decides to be a definition of a "success story." For some entrepreneurs, it might be getting acqui-hired, for some -- a $10M exit, for some -- a $200M exit, and for others -- an IPO. Based on the numbers I have anecdotally heard in conversations over the last decade or so, VCs fund about 1 in 350 ventures they see, and of all of these funded ventures, only about 1 in 10 become really successful (i.e. have a big exit or a successful IPO.) So you are looking at a 1 in 3500 chance of eventual venture success among all of the companies that try to get VC funding. (To put this number in perspective, US VCs invest in about 3000-3500 companies every year.) In addition, there might be a few others (say, maybe another 1-2 in every 10 companies that get VC investments) that get "decent" exits along the way, and hence could be categorized as somewhat successful depending on, again, how one chooses to define what qualifies as a "success story." Finally, there might also be companies that may never need or get around to seeking VC funding. One can, of course, find holes in the simplifying assumptions I have made here, but it doesn't really matter if that number instead is 1 in 1000 or 1 in 10000. The basic point being made here is just that the odds are heavily stacked against new ventures being successful. But that's also one of the distinguishing characteristics of entrepreneurs -- to go ahead and try to bring their idea to life despite the heavy odds. Sources of some of the numbers: http://www.nvca.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ven... https://www.pwcmoneytree.com/MTP... http://paulgraham.com/future.html Here are others' calculations of the odds that lead to a similar conclusion: 1.Dear Entrepreneurs: Here's How Bad Your Odds Of Success Are http://www.businessinsider.com/startup-odds-of-success-2013-5 2.Why 99.997% Of Entrepreneurs May Want To Postpone Or Avoid VC -- Even If You Can Get It http://www.forbes.com/sites/dileeprao/2013/07/29/why-99-997-of-entrepreneurs-may-want-to-postpone-or-avoid-vc-even-if-you-can-get-it/MB
-
How much equity should I ask as a C-level executive in a new startup ?
As you may suspect, there really isn't a hard and fast answer. You can review averages to see that a CEO typically becomes a major shareholder in a startup, but your role and renumeration will be based on the perceived value you bring to the organization. You value someone's contribution through equity when you think that they will be able to add long-term benefits, you would prefer that they don't move company part way through the process, and to keep them from being enticed by a better salary (a reason for equity tied to a vesting arrangement). Another reason is when the company doesn't have salary money available but the potential is very strong. In this situation you should be especially diligent in your analysis because you will realize that even the best laid plans sometimes fall completely short. So to get the best mix, you have to be very real about the company's long-term growth potential, your role in achieving it, and the current liquidity necessary to run the operations. It should also be realized that equity needs to be distributed. You cannot distribute 110% and having your cap table recalculated such that your 5% turns into 1% in order to make room for the newly hired head of technology is rather demotivating for the team. Equity should be used to entice a valuable person to join, stay, and contribute. It should not be used in leu of salary that allows an employee to pay their bills. So, like a lot of questions, the answer is really, it depends. Analyzing the true picture of your long-term potential will allow you to more easily determine the correct mix.DH
-
How much equity should I give an engineer who I'm asking to join my company as a co-founder? (He'll be receiving a salary, too, and I'm self-funding)
You will find a lot of different views on equity split. I haven't found a silver bullet. My preference/experience is for: 1. Unequal shares because one person needs to be the ultimate decision maker (even if it's 1% difference). I have found that I have never had to use that card because we are always rational about this (and I think us being rational is driven because we don't want a person to always pull that card cause it's a shitty card to pull) 2. When it comes to how much equity, I like Paul Graham's approach best: if I started the business by myself, I would own 100% of the equity; if xxx joined me, he/she would increase my chances of success by 40% (40% is just an example) at this moment in time. Therefore, I should give him/her 40% of the company (http://paulgraham.com/equity.html) 3. In terms of range, it could go between (15-49%) depending on the level of skill. But anything less than 15%, I would personally not feel like a cofounder 4. Regarding salary and the fact that you will pay him/her, that's tricky but a simple way to think about it: If an outside investor were to invest the equivalent of a salary at this exact moment into the startup, what % of the company would they get? (this may lowball it if you think the valuation is high but then again if you think you could get a high valuation for a company with no MVP, then you should go raise money) One extra thing for you to noodle on: given you are not technical, I would make sure a friend you trust (and who's technical) help you evaluate the skill of your (potential) cofounder. It will help stay calibrated given you really like this person.MR
-
Business partner I want to bring on will invest more money than me, but will be less involved in operations, how do I split the company?
Cash money should be treated separately than sweat equity. There are practical reasons for this namely that sweat equity should always be granted in conjunction with a vesting agreement (standard in tech is 4 year but in other sectors, 3 is often the standard) but that cash money should not be subjected to vesting. Typically, if you're at the idea stage, the valuation of the actual cash going in (again for software) is anywhere between $300,000 and $1m (pre-money). If you're operating in any other type of industry, valuations would be much lower at the earliest stage. The best way to calculate sweat equity (in my experience) is to use this calculator as a guide: http://foundrs.com/. If you message me privately (via Clarity) with some more info on what the business is, I can tell you whether I would be helpful to you in a call.TW
-
What is a better title for a startup head....Founder or CEO? Are there any pros/cons to certain titles?
The previous answers given here are great, but I've copied a trick from legendary investor Monish Pabrai that I've used in previous startups that seems to work wonders -- especially if your company does direct B2B sales. Many Founders/ CEOs are hung up on having the Founder/ CEO/ President title. As others have mentioned, those titles have become somewhat devalued in today's world -- especially if you are in a sales meeting with a large organization. Many purchasing agents at large organizations are bombarded by Founders/ CEOs/ Presidents visiting them all day. This conveys the image that a) your company is relatively small (the CEO of GM never personally sells you a car) and b) you are probably the most knowledgeable person in the organization about your product, but once you land the account the client company will mostly be dealing with newly hired second level staff. Monish recommends that Founder/ CEOs hand out a business card that has the title "Head of Sales" or "VP of Sales". By working in the Head of Sales role, and by your ability to speak knowledgeably about the product, you will convey the message that a) every person in the organization is very knowledgeable about the ins and outs of the product (even the sales guys) and b) you will personally be available to answer the client's questions over the long run. I've used this effectively many times myself.VR
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.