Loading...
Answers
MenuWould you ever consider giving up equity to bring on a Chief Marketing Officer?
We really need someone out front creating buzz and connecting with our tribe. Our team is big enough to turn out a good product, support customers, and close deals, however, we currently don't have have anyone dedicated to PR, social media, and events and I think we're missing a lot of opportunities because of it. Finding a passionate marketing guru in our industry will be difficult and it seems like equity could help light the fire for an A player. Should giving up equity be standard practice for small software team? I've heard of giving up equity for an amazing designer, what about a CMO?
Answers
I think you should give equity to anyone who's going to have an impact on your team. That's true for engineers, designers and especially marketing people.
Some of the most important people are marketers - however, the best marketers are more product marketers then just a PR / community person.
Equity usually vest over 4 years, so there's 0 risk in issue equity to anyone ... cause if they don't perform, just let them go and no big deal.
Hope that helps.
At a startup level, it's best to avoid c-level appointments. Could your startup benefit from someone who understands how to cost-effectively acquire customers and inflate word of mouth through PR and other types of outreach? Probably.
But keep in mind that attention is a two-sided coin. If your startup isn't prepared for more users and the increased customer support demand, increase to feature backlog, potentially critical reviews, then it may make sense to hold off on hiring someone full-time until you are a bit further along.
Generally speaking, anyone joining a startup should be motivated by their equity. Even if it's a quarter of one percent of the company (assuming of course that grant is stage-appropriate), that person should be motivated to work as part of your team to make that quarter of one percent worth a life-changing amount of money for that person.
Happy to learn more about your company and your current progress and help you evaluate your team needs at this point and in the near future.
You are right to say you are missing opportunities. What you need is a good VP of Community. You don't want a seasoned CMO from the "old school". You need someone who understands the online world and is able to be a champion for your tribe. It really is a full time job that requires focus and good people skills that transfer to the digital world.
As for equity? It never hurts to offer it if you are willing and find the right person. And, if you want the best talent, equity is probably a good idea assuming your benefits package is not strong enough to beat the competition. Lay out a 3-5 year equity plan to create longevity. A small equity position up front with increases each period based on longevity, performance or both. It's all negotiable.
I'd love to chat with you more about this. I am pretty connected and might be able to refer you to the talent you are looking for.
All the best!
Kevin McCarthy
Only if you are giving equity to me. Just joking. You should definitely put your money where you mouth is. If you really want to grow then give equity. You can make this a tiered program which is fully vested after 4 years. 25% vested per year with the first 25% starting on the day one. 50% vested on the one year anniversary. The CMO has a vested interest from day one.
Michael T. Irvin
NoHogWashMarketing.com
"Get To The Top Without The Slop"
michaelirvin.net
Related Questions
-
What would be a good answer for describing the size of your company to a potential prospect who might consider you too small to service their account?
What an awesome question! Businesses are running into this issue more frequently that ever, good news is, it can be done. Having worked on projects with oDesk, Fox Television and Wikipedia and having a very very small staff, it's certainly possible. Here's how I say it in our pitches to larger organizations: "Tractive West provides tailored video production services to organizations of all sizes. We have developed a distributed workflow using the latest digital tools. We leverage our small creative and management team with a world wide network of creative professionals, that means we can rapidly scale to meet the demands of any project while keeping our infrastructure and overhead lightweight and sustainable." Cheers and best of luck.SM
-
What are good restaurant related questions that I can ask in a survey for the purpose of exemplifying the market to investors?
I think it is a good start. From my experience, people don't really know what they want -- they only think they do. An example of this is when Steve Jobs announced the iPad. There was collective confusion (more so than any other time Apple has done something). Now, we couldn't imagine our world without it. That said, the participants of your survey will likely answer within their comfort zone or what they are familiar with. This is what they *think* they want. If you base your entire business model on what people think they want, you will end up duplicating what they are already accustom to (your competition). Getting a sense of your market is a good thing, but you most have the "secret sauce" that will woo your potential customers away from their routine. I don't know what type of restaurant you are aiming for, be it fast food, causal sit down, unique and interesting, or 5-star quality. Based on that, price becomes very subjective. There is a very unique, one-off restaurant I enjoy visiting when I am traveling in Southern California. It is priced higher than any other restaurant in the area, but I am not paying for the food or even the service. I am paying for the way it makes me feel and the environment they maintain. The participants of your survey will likely not be considering intangibles like this when they answer. Keep this in mind, but don't build your entire business around it. Questions to validate your business model may include: - How important is the selection of adult beverages? - How important is the selection of healthy choices? - How important is a family-friendly environment? - How important is the quality of food (we don't always go where the food is best) - How important is the speed of service? Based on your question, I am guessing you are going for a family-friendly, speedy, inexpensive alternative to McDonalds, Burger King, or Carl Jr's. These companies have deep pockets to fend off upstarts. Your value proposition will need to be rock solid to defend against the giants of the industry.SN
-
How was SnapChat able to grow so quickly?
I'm answering your question assuming that you hope to be able to replicate it's own success in your own mobile app. There are a couple of factors responsible for it's growth that are instructive to anyone building a mobile app. "Leveraging the intimacy and privacy of the mobile phone." We now have an *intimate* relationship with our phone like no other device in the history of technology. Every internet company that started before around 2010 has built their core interactions around "the old web" one which was accessed primarily via a browser on a computer. Companies that start with a clean slate, should be building their interactions around how to do whatever the app is supposed to do while leveraging what is unique to people's relationship to their mobile devices. Photo-sharing has become a core part of the way we communicate now. Snapchat built something that provided an experience that leveraged the feeling of privacy and intimacy that is unique to mobile. "Provided an escape from the "maturity" of other online services." Too many parents, aunts, uncles and other "old people" have encroached into the social networks of teens and young people. As a result, they've had a desire to find places to express themselves in places inaccessible by older generations. An important distinction is that it's not just parents and relatives that young people are trying to avoid, but also employers & colleges who are increasingly using "mature" social networks to review applicants. "Leveraged PR even bad PR" The fact that the app got so much press about it being used to sext was perfect PR for the company, as it essentially reinforced the brand experience that it has today. Essentially, "if it's safe enough to send a sext, it's safe for any kind of communication I want to have." And although the safety and security of Snapchat is actually not as advertised, it still enjoys the reputation of having less impact than any primarily web-based service. Building a successful mobile application is one of the hardest challenges to face designers, programmers and entrepreneurs in the history of writing software. Happy to talk to you if you're considering building a mobile app, about what I've learned about the "table stakes" for success.TW
-
Is it ok from a brand perspective to have different color schemes for your logo for different purposes?
Building a brand takes more than a logo. With that said, consistency is key for obtaining a competitive advantage that speaks to your market for longer. I would recommend against using different styles and colors for various purposes and instead maybe avoid using in lieu of the logo use maybe instead borders or patterns that use your logo's or brand colors. The idea of a logo is to engrave a mission or product into potential customers when they simply see the brand or logo... Once a logo is pushed and promoted you can strengthen that image by enforcing the brands colors through different materials or media :)HV
-
What is a good scope of work for a marketing and PR department?
Build a body of work in the form of a blog. Much depends on the size and scope of your company, but branded journalism can really make a huge difference.....AW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.