Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat should homepage layout look like?
For a marketplace similar to Airtasker where you can hire taskers to complete tasks. Should it be by location and task or by task only or just location and then task? What are some good CRO homepages in similar niche to take inspiration from?
Answers
Iam an Engineer by profession and having long track record of engaging people on freelancing sites. What i have learnt, is that the way your marketplace homepage is organised can have a big impact on conversion rates and user experience. Which way to organise tasks—by task or by location and task—depends only on your platform's specifications and the tastes of your intended audience. Here are some things to think about for each choice:
Place and Assignment:
Positives: It's simple for users to locate nearby taskers, which fosters convenience and a sense of community. For services like garden work or home repairs that call for personal presence, this method works well.
Cons: The diversity of tasks may be too much for some users to handle, and users may have to sift through a lot of them to get what they're searching for Just the task:
Positives: Users may easily explore tasks according to their needs or hobbies, which makes the search process simpler. This strategy works well with platforms that provide a wide variety of jobs, both locally and remotely.
Cons: Users who prefer in-person contact may not connect with taskers, and they may lose out on local chances.
Place, Next Task:
Advantages: By combining the two components, users can select a task after first limiting the alternatives by selecting their location. This strikes a balance between task specialisation and localization.
Cons: Users may still need to sort through a variety of possibilities, depending on the quantity of activities that are offered.
It is imperative that you take inspiration from well-performing platforms in related categories when it comes to Conversion Rate Optimisation (CRO) for your homepage. Here are some instances that you may look into:
TaskRabbit:
One well-known task-based marketplace is TaskRabbit. Its site is dominated by a simple layout, big call-to-action buttons, and task recommendations that are tailored to the user's location.
Using a thumbtack
Thumbtack's homepage features a variety of task types and prominently displays popular service categories. It offers a personalised experience by enabling customers to input their service requests immediately.
Fiverr:
Even though Fiverr focuses more on projects, it is a great illustration of how to provide a range of jobs and services in an eye-catching manner. Their webpage highlights the variety of tasks accessible and includes collections that have been carefully chosen.
Upwork:
A wider range of professional services are served by Upwork. With obvious calls to action for both clients and freelancers, its homepage is focused on assisting visitors in finding independent contractors for a range of jobs and projects.
Think about the following components when you optimise your homepage for conversions:
Clearly state what your platform delivers and why people should select it in your clear value proposition.
Maintain a simple, user-friendly layout that directs people to the portions that are most pertinent to them.
Effective Call-to-Action: Utilise concise and eye-catching calls to action (CTAs) to persuade visitors to take the Effective Call-to-Action: Utilise concise and eye-catching calls to action (CTAs) to motivate users to proceed.
Personalisation: on make an experience more engaging, adjust material according on user preferences and behaviour.
The optimal strategy will ultimately rely on your unique business model, target market, and the kind of activities that are available on your platform. Consistently test and refine your homepage according to user input and performance analytics to make improvements that will increase conversions.
If this is appealing we can talk on call.
Here are some ideas for the homepage layout and design for a marketplace similar to Airtasker based on the information you provided:
Location and Task Focus
Have a search bar prominently displayed where users can enter their location and the type of task they need help with. This allows users to easily find relevant tasks.
Below the search bar, display categories of popular tasks available in the user's city. This further helps them refine their search.
Task Focus Only
Instead of focusing on location upfront, allow users to first select the task they need help with from different categories.
Once they select a category, they can enter their location to find taskers. This puts emphasis on tasks rather than location.
Location Focus Only
Display a map and allow users to enter or select their location first.
Once they add their location, then show categories of tasks frequently requested in that area.
Some sites to take inspiration from:
Airtasker
TaskRabbit
Fiverr
UrbanClap
Amazon Home Services
Key elements to include:
Easy search and filters
Clear navigation/categories
Prominently display top-rated or reviewed taskers
Include testimonials
Focus on visuals—videos or images of tasks
Clear pricing/packages
Simple signup/login process
Emphasize security and screening of taskers
I hope these ideas and examples help guide the homepage design and layout in a way that drives conversions! Let me know if you need any other specifics.
The optimal approach for structuring the user experience on a marketplace like Airtasker depends on various factors such as user behavior, the nature of tasks, and the overall goals of your platform. Here are three potential approaches to consider:
1. **Location and Task Combined:**
- **Pros:** Users can quickly find taskers available in their local area, streamlining the process of hiring someone nearby. This approach is beneficial for tasks that require physical presence or local expertise.
- **Cons:** It may limit users who are open to hiring someone from a different location, especially for tasks that can be performed remotely.
2. **Task Only:**
- **Pros:** Users can focus on finding the most qualified tasker for a specific job, regardless of their location. This can be particularly useful for tasks that can be completed remotely or for users who are more concerned with skills than proximity.
- **Cons:** Users may need to sift through a larger pool of taskers, and for certain tasks requiring physical presence, it might be less convenient.
3. **Location First, Then Task:**
- **Pros:** Users start by selecting their location and are then presented with taskers available in that area. This combines the benefits of both approaches, providing local options while allowing users to specify the type of task they need.
- **Cons:** Some users might find the process less streamlined compared to the other two options.
**Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO) Homepage Examples:**
For inspiration on designing an effective homepage in a similar niche, you can explore the following platforms:
1. **TaskRabbit:**
- **Homepage Focus:** TaskRabbit's homepage prominently features a search bar where users can enter the task they need assistance with. They also incorporate location-based filtering, allowing users to find taskers in their area.
2. **Thumbtack:**
- **Homepage Focus:** Thumbtack emphasizes the simplicity of finding local professionals for various services. They showcase categories of services and encourage users to get started by selecting the type of service they need.
3. **Upwork:**
- **Homepage Focus:** While Upwork is more geared towards remote work, its homepage is an excellent example of highlighting various categories and encouraging users to find freelancers based on their specific needs.
When exploring these platforms, pay attention to elements such as clear call-to-action buttons, intuitive navigation, and the balance between showcasing popular categories and allowing users to quickly start their search. Adapt these insights to your specific marketplace and user base to create a homepage that maximizes user engagement and conversion.
For further information, feel free to book a call.
A compelling homepage layout typically includes:
1. **Clear Value Proposition:** Concisely communicate what your business offers and why it's valuable.
2. **Navigation Menu:** Intuitive and easy-to-use navigation for visitors to explore your site.
3. **Eye-catching Imagery:** Use high-quality visuals that resonate with your brand and captivate visitors.
4. **Call-to-Action (CTA):** Include a prominent CTA guiding visitors to take the desired action, such as making a purchase or contacting you.
5. **Key Features or Services:** Highlight key products, services, or features that set your business apart.
6. **Testimonials or Reviews:** Showcase positive feedback from satisfied customers to build trust.
7. **Latest Content or Updates:** Keep the homepage dynamic with recent blog posts, news, or featured products.
8. **Contact Information:** Make it easy for visitors to reach out to you, whether through a contact form or direct contact details.
9. **Mobile Responsiveness:** Ensure your layout is mobile-friendly for users on various devices.
Remember, simplicity and clarity are key. Tailor the layout to match your brand identity and guide visitors toward meaningful interactions.
Kind Regards - Christian Bernard.
Related Questions
-
Will redesigning a website (ground up) ruin the search ranking of a site?
TL;DR -> Yes you will risk it if you don't perform a proper audit and migration from the original platform. Any type of architecture changes can 100% ruin your SEO if you are not migrating content and topics correctly. Many people assume this is limited to URI structure but underestimate the power of Topical hierarchy and the content, internal linking and URI structure which play a crucial role into any migration effort. If you have any questions about the migration process, give me a shout. Decent free migration checklist: https://searchengineland.com/site-migration-seo-checklist-dont-lose-traffic-286880TM
-
When creating a marketplace, does it make more sense to focus on stimulating demand first or supply?
Focus on the more difficult side of the marketplace. For instance, if you think it'll be easier to get suppliers, then focus first on getting buyers - always be working on your toughest problem (aka your biggest risk). You'll find some great blogging on Marketplace and Platform topics here http://platformed.info (read the ebook too!)CM
-
When recording income for a marketplace startup, is it typical to use the gross transaction or just the fees collected per payment?
You usually only recognize the commissions as revenues and use the term "Gross Merchandise Value" (GMV) to describe the size of the marketplace (value of all transactions going through the site)BW
-
I'm looking to get off the Yahoo platform. Shopify seems to be nice, and BigCommerce just looks like a slightly better Yahoo. Thoughts?
Shopify is best use case for $0 to $1M ish, depending on product line, how many transactions that makes up, and if their are some custom things that are not possible on Shopify that realistically lead to huge gains that would cover more costs of a custom solution with something like magento. I recommend Shopify to everyone starting out. That's what we used at Diamond Candles up until about a $5M run rate. We were/are growing quickly so we hit a point where payoff of customizing checkout flow, add of social sign on, etc. that could not be done because of Shopify, would cover and surpass costs of a more custom option. Best to think about this simplistic example. View the ecom platform market in about 3 buckets. 1. Starting out: $0-$1M ish 2. Wow looks like you have a business: $1M-$20 or 50ish 3. You are/could be publicly traded: $50M+ Take a look at usage #'s for market share size from independent third party analytics tools from Builtwith: http://trends.builtwith.com/shop/Shopify/Market-Share http://trends.builtwith.com/shop http://trends.builtwith.com/shop/hosted-solution Just because something is found on the web more isn't the full picture. Ie. I could make a blogging platform and have a bunch of scripts and bots install it on millions of domains and I would have majority of the market for blogging platforms (ya that would take a while and isn't a realistic scenario but you can get the point). Providers dominating the different categories by companies in those areas actually doing volume and being succsessful? 1. Shopify, BigCommerce, Volusion, Magento GO, 2. Magento (varying editions), Yahoo Stores, Symphony Commerce 3. Demand Ware, GSI Commerce, Magento (varying editions) At the end of the day a good illustration goes like this. A truck and a moped are two different things. A truck is not trying to out 'moped' a moped and a moped not trying to out 'truck' a truck. They are both perfectly suited to different applications, situations, needs, and circumstances. The same goes with who you choose to handle your ecom platform. For 2-3 search for internet retailers first 500 and second 500 lists. Pull off all ecommerce companies doing between $10-$50M as an example. Use the builtwith.com chrome toolbar to tell you what platform they are using. Hire someone for $2 an hour via odesk to make a spreadsheet of everything and the make a pretty little pie chart. Now you know what each revenue volume level chooses as 1, 2, 3 preferred platforms. Option 3 as a side note but very important one, is primarily a platform and commerce as a service model with companies like Demand Ware and GSI Commerce leading the market with platform and services including but not limited to customer service for the brand, fulfillment, marketing services, website product photography etc. Their pricing models are based on gross revenue share. ie. SportsAuthority.com does $100M online this year, GSI takes 30% of that to cover everything. (I am not sure who Sports Authority uses, just an example) You can almost pick any traditional brick and mortar retailer and if they have a website where they sell things, they all do, GSI or DW are the people behind the scenes running the call centers, shipping etc. Diamond Candles, my company, who started on Shopify decided to not go with a the market dominating option of Magento for a few reasons. One of which being upfront cost for an agency or on staff magento CTO type. We decided to partner with a newer entrant, Symphony Commerce, which blends the 3rd category model of platform plus service. Rev. cut is significantly smaller than providers in category 3, but still get benefits of volume savings on shipping volume, scalable customer support that can handle rapid growth and occasional spikes without us having to worry about scaling or implementing best practices, and a fully customizable platform as a service so to speak that doesn't require us to have in house tech but where we are essentially renting part time ecommerce engineers from with resumes that list Google, FB, Twitter, Magento, Amazon, etc. So in summary. If you are <$1M in revenue just roll with Shopify. Greater than that but less than $50M ish then I would recommend looking into Symphony. If Symphony is interested in letting you in then you won't have to incur the upfront costs of an agency or implementation and you will have an ongoing partner equally incentivized i your long term success financially which I prefer as opposed to an agency model which economically is incentivized to offer a one time finished product and their revenue is not tied to my financial success. It is the closest thing to an equity partner while returning our full equity.JW
-
Freemium v.s. free trial for a marketplace?
It depends on a number of factors but I'd boil it down to two key things to start: 1) What is your real cost to provide a free plan or trial? 2) Who exactly is your customer and what are they used to paying and who and how do they pay today? When you say "online workforce marketplace" it sounds as though you're placing virtual workers. If that's the case, or if you're paying for the supply side of the marketplace, the question is how much can you subsidize demand? Depending on where you're at in the process, I'd also question how much you can learn about the viability of your marketplace by offering a free version, assuming again, that free is actually a real cost to you. I was part of a SaaS project that started charging people for early access based mostly on just a good landing page (we clearly stated they were pre-paying) and were amazed at the response. I've also run a SaaS product that offered free trials and realized that the support costs and hand-holding and selling required to convert from free trial to paid wasn't worth it, this despite the product's significant average ARR. You might be better off providing a "more information" sign-up form (to capture more leads) and let them ask for a free trial while only showing your paid options. I've been amazed at the lead capture potential from a simple "have questions? Click here and we'll contact you" This is all the generalized advice I can offer based on the limited information I have, but happy to dive-in further if you'd like on a call.TW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.