Loading...
Answers
MenuOutsourcing the tech on a booststarp startup ?
Answers
Hi.
good questions.
Answers:
1. Yes and No - it depends on what you're developing. If it is a cyber product or software, then investors would (usually) expect you to have in-house developers (meaning programmers which are part of the core team). If it's a website that offers services or an app, and you prove to them (through metrics/statistics) that you don't need an in-house programmer, it should be a problem.
2. I can't name any known companies at the tip of my hat, but I have advised hundreds of startups and many of them outsourced their development. If you need, I can connect you with a development company that selects 1-2 startups a year and does development + support for them free of charge, in exchange for equity/shares in the company. Your only costs would be the legal fees for the agreements.
I've successfully helped over 350 entrepreneurs, startups and businesses, and I would be happy to help you. After scheduling a call, please send me some background information so that I can prepare in advance - thus giving you maximum value for your money. Take a look at the great reviews I’ve received: https://clarity.fm/assafben-david
Outsourcing development could go either way. The key to success with any development is having two components:
1) Developers who understand how to prove the business AND technical concept.
2) Having a development pattern/workflow that can help you transition the technology upon completion. This is the one I see most founders struggle with (see below for an solution).
While I'm sure there are success stories of bootstrapped companies who successfully outsourced initial development, I can't name any notable ones whose stories are easily accessible. In my own personal experience, my firm and I have been hired by several hedge funds and private equity firms over the years to build new products. The most recognizable is TopGolf, where they outsourced some of their game play data movement (a gameplay product). We've also built a whole bunch of software for manufacturing companies, pipeline firms, etc. The point: it's rarely ever the sexy stuff you hear about, but it is very successful.
The challenge of recruiting a tech cofounder or tech talent of any kind is a problem I repeatedly see amongst the founders I advise. New companies need all kinds of "basic" stuff setup before you can develop anything... email, domain names, hosting, Github accounts, credit card processors, an email list system, etc. This stuff sounds simple, but it's not. Wonder why your email isn't going out to the person who just signed up? Did you check your DKIM settings, DMARC records, and DNSSEC? Those are all things the "sideline" or "affordable junior level" developer tends to ignore. The point: It's never as simple as just building an app or POC/MVP (that's the fun part).
Because this is such a common point of failure, I launched a service to do all the setup (see https://butlerlogic.com/startup). We don't build POC's, MVP's, apps, or any of the fun stuff.... we build the predictable/reliable foundation that developers need (but hate to make). It gives non-tech founders an advantage in attracting the right talent (who can focus on the fun part). Bottom line, you can recruit tech folks or firms who are passionate about your BUSINESS IDEA. We built our own workflow, based on decades of experience doing this. We've kept costs reasonable this way, while delivering world class tech foundations (we're kind of known for this... by 2.5M developers). We provide a free 15 minute call here on Clarity for anyone interested in how this works and whether it's right for their startup.
It is better to work with an outsourcing company in the MVP and early stages to build the product than finding a tech co-founder. There are several reasons:
1. it is very hard to find a reliable tech founder.
2. you will have to convince the person about your idea and also give away liquidity.
3. Even if you find, it doesn't mean that tech co-founder will be able to do everything, you still might have to hire some developers to do tech work.
I would suggest to go with outsourcing now. I have written a detailed blog here, you can check more details:
https://www.simpalm.com/blog/do-you-need-freelancers-or-co-founders-for-technology-startups
I would suggest to go for an outsourcing consultant for few months and you can anytime discontinue the service once you feel that you have reached to the right market. I can help you out with the complete website design and along with that will also focus on website maintenance, social media marketing, content creation, brochures and PPTs for you. Please reach me out on pooja.s@xeo.marketing for detailed discussion. Thanks!
Regards
Pooja
Related Questions
-
how to start earning on clarity.fm
Most of the earnings come from the people you are in contact with. The platform is not that big at the moment but it can be earned. My recommendation is to create content on your private page web, facebook, instagram ... and leave a clarity link through your work. If you need extra help call me for 15 minutes.DB
-
What is the average series A funding round at pre revenue valuation for a enterprise start up w/cutting edge tech on verge of our first client.
With all respect to Dan, I'm not seeing anything like that. You said "pre-revenue." If it's pre-revenue and enterprise, you don't have anything proven yet. You would have to have an insanely interesting story with a group of founders and execs on board with ridiculous competitive advantage built in. I have seen a few of those companies. It's more like $3m-$5m pre. Now, post-revenue is different. I've seen enterprise plays with $500k-$1m revenue/yr, still very early (because in the enterprise space that's not a lot of customers yet), getting $8m-$15m post in an A-round. I do agree there's no "average." Finally, you will hit the Series A Crunch issue, which is that for every company like yours with "cutting edge tech" as-yet-unproven, there's 10 which also have cutting edge tech except they have customers, revenue, etc.. So in this case, it's not a matter of valuation, but a matter of getting funded at all!JC
-
How can a small offshore development company find companies/software sales people to sell their service in the US/UK?
My company does a lot of consulting with offshore firms who are looking for a way to generate new business, so I hear this question a lot. My first reaction is that you need to totally reverse your mindset when you talk about your own company. You mentioned that you have: a great software developers team, proven track record, passion, real value But, everyone says that. There a 10,000 companies that have those things, so a customer isn't going to notice it. You need to figure out what your company is best at (doesn't have to be technical) and present it as a solution to a specific problem that clients have. Maybe a speciality, or really good project management, really good communications, a special expertise or experience, a personality, experience with a certain type of client.. really anything.. But, there must be some thing that makes your company 'special' otherwise you will be lost in the mix. Don't worry about things like rates, or the fact that you have 'great' developers. Those are generic. Think about why a client would really choose you, and try to build on that! After you understand your company identity, it gets much easier to identify and engage marketing channels because you understand your target.DH
-
How much equity should I ask as a CMO in a startup?
Greater risk = greater equity. How likely is this to fail or just break even? If you aren't receiving salary yet are among 4-6 non-founders with equivalent sweat investment, all of whom are lower on the totem pole than the two founders, figure out: 1) Taking into account all likely outcomes, what is the most likely outcome in terms of exit? (ex: $10MM.) Keep in mind that 90%+ of all tech startups fail (Allmand Law study), and of those that succeed 88% of M&A deals are under $100MM. Startups that exit at $1B+ are so rare they are called "unicorns"... so don't count on that, no matter how exciting it feels right now. 2) Figure out what 1% equity would give you in terms of payout for the most likely exit. For example, a $10MM exit would give you $100k for every 1% you own. 3) Decide what the chance is that the startup will fail / go bankrupt / get stuck at a $1MM business with no exit in sight. (According to Allman Law's study, 10% stay in business - and far fewer than that actually exit). 4) Multiply the % chance of success by the likely outcome if successful. Now each 1% of equity is worth $10k. You could get lucky and have it be worth millions, or it could be worth nothing. (With the hypothetical numbers I'm giving here, including the odds, you are working for $10k per 1% equity received if the most likely exit is $10MM and the % chance of failure is 90%.) 5) Come up with a vesting path. Commit to one year, get X equity at the end. If you were salaried, the path would be more like 4 years, but since it's free you deserve instant equity as long as you follow through for a reasonable period of time. 6) Assuming you get agreement in writing from the founders, what amount of $ would you take in exchange for 12 months of free work? Now multiply that by 2 to factor in the fact that the payout would be far down the road, and that there is risk. 7) What percentage share of equity would you need in order to equal that payout on exit? 8) Multiply that number by 2-3x to account for likely dilution over time. 9) If the founders aren't willing to give you that much equity in writing, then it's time to move on! If they are, then decide whether you're willing to take the risk in exchange for potentially big rewards (and of course, potentially empty pockets). It's a fascinating topic with a lot of speculation involved, so if you want to discuss in depth, set up a call with me on Clarity. Hope that helps!RD
-
What do (bootstrapped) startups offer to new sales hires? Commission only? What are some good examples to keep people motivated and still survive?
Generally bootstrapped startups should avoid salespeople, for a few reasons: a. they typically can't afford the base and overall comp required to attract sales people who can actually sell / or afford to support them with marketing, management, etc b. it will be very difficult to find the rare person with the right mix of sales and startup DNA along with the critical domain knowledge, consequently the startup is likely to settle c. the founders need to be very involved in the selling and customers will demand it That said, if the plan is still to hire a salesperson, find someone who has demonstrated sales success in startups and is excited by the early stage in company building. Create a comp plan heavily leveraged on sales results (unless you are in an industry where 100% commission is a common practice, would recommend against $0 base as this creates the false impression that your hire isn't passing time with one company while looking for another job with a richer comp plan - you want your rep focussed). Sell the vision and opportunity to be part of a growth story. I have written a several blog posts on hiring sales people into start-ups. You might find these useful: http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/ceo-question-should-i-learn-to-sell-or-hire-a-sales-person/ http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/start-up-sales-and-hiring-advice-dont-stop-selling-once-you-hire-your-first-sales-rep/ http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/hiring-start-up-sales-reps/ http://www.peaksalesrecruiting.com/startups-and-salespeople/ Good luck!EB
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.