Loading...
Answers
MenuHow can I build trust, if a 'shared economy' platform is offering a 'once in a lifetime' experience ("share your weddings"), so reviews can't be used?
I'm building a platform for to-be-married couples to connect with travelers who want to attend their weddings for a deeper cultural experience: JoinMyWedding.com
Answers
You need to build trust in your vetting process, which means you actually need a good vetting process. Some ideas would be to have reviews of the potential guest from their facebook friends. Each review would have links to the reviewer's facebook profiles. Have links to the potential guest's own facebook profile, twitter, linkedin, etc. The more background links you provide, the easier it will be for the wedding couple to decide whether to invite the person or not.
I don't know if you will ever get to the point of convincing a couple to invite a stranger to their wedding, but those things will at least get you closer to that possibility.
If you'd like to brainstorm other ideas on the topic, let me know,
best,
Lee
I love this idea! Lead with a story, focus on creating an idealistic story line that couples can relate to... feel exited about and justify to themselves having a stranger in their wedding. Make the focus of your website's and marketing pitch... stick to it, don't settle or try justifying yourself to the potential market - make it seem as if there is already an existing demand and solution by always having a story of how amazing it is to start a new with new friends, cultural growth and opportunities for friends around the world.
This is a two sided market place but you need to have weddings first.. once your content is there, lead with a story to travelers and target them through their appropriate social networks. it will be a lot easier to get people to join a wedding than it is for those getting married to invite strangers. - make them non-strangers first. always lead with a story, for yourself, for the joining and the to be wed - to learn about each other and the context in which they will meet.
I don't understand the last bit of your question "so reviews can't be used", so I'll answer the first bit about building trust.
For the to-be-married couples, trusting who will come to their wedding is really important because of the potential risk associated with having their event ruined by "bad guests".
Building trust = reducing that risk.
How? Couple ideas:
1. Require the guests to link their social media presence. It's functions like a background check. One filter that could be useful here is to only allow linking to accounts that are at least a year old (or whatever period you choose )
2. Video interviews could be a good way to build the rapport also
Beyond the trust building, you can also reduce the risk by doing things like the following:
1. Have the guests join only part of the festivity that are less risky (bachelor's party) but still part of the culture
2. Have them seated in an area that can be controlled
3. Make explicitly clear that if the guests do any disruptive behavior, they'll be removed from the event
4. Have a representative of your company be present at the wedding or stand-by in case problem arises
Hope this helps.
Ahh - an interesting problem. You could outsource "reputation" to their other social media presence - for instance preview their facebook or instagram profile to see if there is a connection. I wonder if this is even better than reviews actually - especially in such a personal context as attending a wedding. People likely want to look for "someone like me".
I think about trust and reputation a lot as I work at a 2-sided marketplace company. Happy to brainstorm ideas with you :)
Related Questions
-
Specific Tactics to find a co-founder, Do you have what it takes? (ONLY real Startup founders answer please)
Here's what you need to do to recruit any cofounder: 1) Prove or at least instill *high* confidence that you can fund the business or raise the funds required; 2) Demonstrate that you are someone worth following. What have you done previously that clearly shows to others that you have what it takes to succeed? 3) Credibly demonstrate that your idea can create massive success. An idea by itself, no matter how interesting is woefully insufficient. 4) Spend every day making outreach (cold emails, LinkedIn, dribbble, etc) to people, meeting at least 3 a week. You will "kiss many frogs." It's likely you have to meet at least 100 people to find the right person and that assumes you have 1-3. By the way, in order to actually *meet* 100 good people, you'll have to make outbound to at least 400 people. 5) Negotiate equity and compensation (pre and post funding) and ensure written alignment on how decisions are made between the two of you. Cofounder relationships are as intense as marriages. And just like getting married, it requires a lot of dating to build the trust. I'm *totally* unconvinced that two people can find a person they haven't known previously, and become effective cofounders. I think you're better off finding the money to hire someone than actually find a cofounder. The main reason? You probably won't find someone as passionate as you are about what you're building. And keep in mind, I have no idea who you are or what you're building so that's no judgement on you or the idea, just the reality I've observed over 20 years of startups.TW
-
Is having "HOME" button in navigation menu necessary if I have a clickable logo? What makes most sense from UX POV?
We have been collecting usage data on the home button from about 750 websites we manage across North America in an effort to try to determine if it is necessary or not. While each website is different, and much of the data is statistically insignificant, we have started to operate with a few assumptions. 1.) Most users, particularly younger users, recognize the logo as a way to get to the home page. 2.) Websites without home buttons seem to get a comparable amount of traffic to the home page as those that do not. We don't see a significant difference between having a home button or not. 3.) Websites without a home button often will see an increase in direct traffic from returning users during a session indicating that users who do not know the logo is a route to the home page will instead clear the address bar back to the root domain to get back home. Based on our research, we have decided to omit the home button in most instances. Although when it is present, it is often used, most users seem to understand how to get to the home page regardless of the inclusion of a home button. With the complexity of modern websites, we are usually pressed for space in the header and can better use the real estate that would be dedicated to the home button for other UI elements. That said, if the audience for our website skews older, we will still include the home button. Our research has indicated older users are less familiar with the concept of the logo being a home button.RS
-
How important is it to have your mobile app's design/branding right --- right from the get-go?
If you're talking about an app-store launch, then it's important to have the core mechanics of the product (from a user interaction perspective) figured out such that the majority of your users are doing the things you want them to do in order to drive continual engagement with the app. Design polish can come later and often slows down whomever is implementing the development of the app. I don't think anything should ever be "ugly" but lacking polish is often the right way to go to get speed to market. That said, to be sure of the core interactions, you want to do as much testing and observing real users use your app prior to launch. Happy to talk through any of this in a call with you.TW
-
What are the pros and cons of building an app versus a responsive website as an MVP?
This is a great question and an important one as well. I would start by identifying: Who is your target market? How will they use your product? On the go? On their laptop or on their mobile device? What kind of technology does your product need? Can it be built as a simple website or does in need to be an app (i.e. you need push notifications, integration with other mobile apps, etc). On the other hand, how much time and budget do you have? Typically a responsive website is faster and cheaper to build than an app and will get you out the door faster.AM
-
How do I best validate an idea before approaching a company?
There are various methods of idea validation. I am listing the ways that are suitable in your case: 1. Run a Survey: You can ask the customers of the electricity company to fill up the survey form with questions like - whether they will use your service or not? How may they are willing to pay to the extra service/better service and other important questions. This will validate your idea and you can show it to the electricity company as a proof of prospective demand. 2. Expert Opinion: You can approach few experts in the electricity and distribution domain. Ask them to provide their opinion about your idea. If you get a positive feedback then you can show this to the electricity company for your support. 3. Influencing recommendation: You can approach people in Government/Administration who can recommend you for this idea. Take their views in written, this will actually serve as a validation and will also support you in pitching. 4. Competitor analysis: Prepare a competitor analysis report and find out whether such services already exist in the world. If you can find similar services that are successful then you can think the idea is validated. 5. Advisor: You can approach an advisor who can consult you about the idea and will validate through thorough analysis. I am an advisor who have validated more than 500 such ideas. I will be happy to discuss more over a call if you wish. All the best. God bless you.DS
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.