Loading...
Answers
MenuHourly? or Set Prices for projects/programs? What are the best practices for creative agencies pricing models?
What are some considerations and feedback for setting prices in an industry that is constantly changing processes and clients have a lot of feedback in the development process of a web-site or marketing campaign, what works vs. what doesn't work? Should you go fix with set scope? or just go hourly with high-level estimates?
Answers
Bill for the project and set clear expectations of the number of revisions, etc. Extra changes are charged at a pre-determined rate (hourly, per change, etc).
The idea is to keep the objective of the project in the forefront. Rather than "designing a website", you are improving the website the meet the goal of the client (perhaps to improve their conversion rate, for example).
It gets very muddy when a client who doesn't know what they want starts getting involved in the design; "what if we change this from black to blue? Can we add a little more space between these lines? I like that picture, but can it have more pop?"
These types of changes dilute the primary reason the client chose you -- for your design abilities. That is a main reason you charge for the project: a website that (we can all assume it will be fully functional, attractive, and in line with best industry practices) meets their goal of conversion.
If you have done your due diligence, you will produce something that captures the "voice" of the client brand and the back and forth design changes will be avoided (in truth, they don't add or take away from the primary function or objective).
This approach *only* works with clear communication and expectations upfront. Have wireframes approved early. Have mock-ups/colors/photos/text approved early. Explain that, once approved, any changes fall outside the scope and will be charged at XYZ rate.
We don't go to auto manufacturers and ask that they change the size of the radio dial nobs or change the pitch of the seats. We are buying a product.
Custom work can be spec'd out accordingly, with the appropriate price figure.
Clients should not expect budget prices and unlimited revisions.
Let me know if you have other questions -- happy to help.
Hourly billing incentivizes slow delivery and overcharges. Knowing this, people like me are very reluctant to hire someone who bills hourly.
Customers have more security when the scope of the project, its timeline, and budget are outlined clearly in advance. Doing this also protects the contractor from those dreaded never-ending jobs.
This is one of those classic "it depends" questions. There are a lot of variables. I would suggest it's best to look at it through the lens of your billing and cash flow. Happy to discuss. I work extensively in this space.
Related Questions
-
As an Agency that currently works on Elance where price/timeframe are the primary criteria buyers seem to be shopping with, how can I get ahead?
Remember when you start a business or are an established business you have to decide who is your perfect customer, since not all potential customers are equal, and not all potential customers are profitable. It is likely that the type of customer who is purely price orientated like those on Elance etc. may not be profitable to your overall business success as it is very unlikely they will pay you more in the future. You would be better focusing your marketing attempts on finding customers who do appraciate your work and understand the added value your agency has to offer, than chasing jobs, by people that only value you and your business by lowest price, which is a business model that can only lead to failure.CM
-
Has anyone increased SaaS subscription pricing by 100% and lived to tell the tale?
Many well-known SaaS companies have doubled their prices. I've personally worked with a few that have gone through it. In most cases, your conversion rates stay the same and you see a huge jump in revenue. This is because people tend to under-price themselves. Also, your product improves over time so it provides more value and can support a higher price. But don't raise prices for old customers. Grandfather them in so their plans stay the same price. In the long run, it won't make a difference to your growth since most of them will churn out anyway. If you raise prices on current customers, you'll get a huge backlash. It gets nasty. I'm pretty sure that Zendesk tried it and had to reverse the price increase. I highly recommend raising your price by 100% for a month on new customers. Keep a close eye on your revenue and your conversion rates. If things don't go well, you can easily reverse it and discount everyone that paid for the more expensive plan. Either way, you'll know what your market will actually support.LL
-
Pricing strategy question: How do you determine whether to offer subscription pricing, transaction pricing or both?
As someone who has worked in pricing for almost 30 years, I know that one of the biggest myths of pricing is that you should only offer one pricing model. Offer two - both subscription & transactional. Customers will self-select &/or the market will segment, and you will quickly find out what is their preferred pricing model. As an aside, another pricing myth is that you can low-ball your pricing and raise prices later. Its successful in ~10% of attempts. By default, the choice of pricing models also states the obvious. Its not about what you want. Its about what the customer wants. And yes, you should have three choices. One choice gives you a 50:50 chance of closing the sale. Two choices forces the customer to make a price-based decision. Three choices, and the customer says "which one do I buy?" not "do I buy from this outfit?" and secondly they are forced to make a value-based decision. Also think about creating a decoy product, and on the pricing page on your website, lay the packages out dearest on the left, cheapest on the right. Happy to chat further about any of the above...or more!JM
-
How do you build a structured sales process for a digital agency that works with Enterprise Ecommerce Clients?
Yes, a consistent sales process is vital so that you know where you are. You also want to know why you lost some orders and won others--I was over a decade into my career before I realized I had no idea why. And that's what lead to the change. You need to understand your numbers. You need to know what the process steps are, and how to proceed to the next one--or let the opportunity die if it should (hint: if you're trying to turn every prospect into a client, you're doing it wrong.) And you must have your fulfillment process dialed in, which at present with the description of murky data-gathering and pricing it sounds like you do not. Loads of info my my blog at http://www.salestactics.org Let's discuss specifics on a call.JK
-
How to decide stakes in a partnership?
The best way to test a person's talent is to put them to work in the reality of your business. If these folks are all onboard for being partners, promise to give them a cut of all deals they bring in. Structure the plan so that the contract lasts three months. Then, let them prove themselves and show (not just say) they really mean it. Make no equity promises until you can validate their claims. What if someone balks at the offer? I'd imagine these folks will have main jobs during the testing phase. If they scoff or refuse, then you've won immediately. If they aren't willing to hustle a bit extra for a few months how in the world could they do this for many years ahead within a successful partnership? Why three months? People can fake their behavior for quite a bit of time. At two months people can't help but being themselves. You'll get a taste for how they work, they're ability to close, and their personality. Personality is the biggest factor, as they may do a great job bringing in business, but be simply unbearable to work alongside. A note of caution around the Head of Marketing SME: this person sounds like a problem. Are they acting immorally towards their current employer? Check, stealing business. Are they sure they can do it on their own, but for some odd reason never have? Check. Are they requesting for more stake than they deserve? Check. These alone are reasons to run. Immoral, unproven, and greedy at the start. To me, you sound like you need to hire a commission based sales person. Give them a stake of each deal. Don't give up equity for something like this. This company is your baby and equity is a last resort.JF
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.