Loading...
Answers
MenuHow can I protect my investment as a minority shareholder?
I have been offered the opportunity to purchase up to 30% of shares in a private company. The only ROI I can feasibly expect is through dividend payments. What is the best way to protect my return, seeing as I would be a minority shareholder? And should I make part of the investment as a shareholder loan?
Answers
Generally speaking, a Preferred Share class with strong protective provisions (such as the right to appoint a board member) could afford you significant protections but if the terms are too onerous relative to the amount of money and stage of the Company, it might prevent the Company from raising further funding downstream, thus hurting your investment.
You could also put all of the money in on a convertible debenture, which has some advantages but doesn't necessarily protect you.
The best way to protect your investment is to invest in good people that you trust. It's simple and true. Happy to talk through the particulars of your situation.
The most important thing you should understand is the distribution of the equity (e.g Someone else has 70% or you are the biggest shareholder with 30%?) and the rights (power of decision) that each shareholder has.
Protection is, in my opinion, created be three things: legal rights (laws and contract), trust and information. You need to focus on mastering the three of them to leverage them in your favor and your protection.
PS: it requires more info to give a good answer
Understanding the specifics of your opportunity are necessary to provide a sufficiently detailed answer. Based on the information you have provided it sounds like the seller is looking for investment as opposed to a loan, so it may not be possible to offer a shareholder loan as a percentage.
As a shareholder in a private entity, it is important to have a very clear understanding of the rules that governs the corporation itself. Unlike publicly traded firms, most shareholders of private firms are active in their investment.
Will a 30% share grant you the option to be involved in business decisions? If not you may find you have challenges receiving any return on investment as management will have considerable latitude to determine whether there is any net income to pay out as dividends.
Does the 70% shareholder work for the company as a full time employee? How is their compensation set? Will you have any oversight in this regard?
I would strongly recommend you approach this deal by seeking a shareholder agreement that is similar to a partnership agreement where the major decisions are made through a process that involves you, while the day to day is managed by the active investor.
I would also ensure that your ROI is sufficient that your capital investment is replaced fairly quickly as it does not sound like your investment will have much, if any liquidity to it.
If there are more details of this you can share, I'd be happy to provide greater specifics.
Doing Business measures the protection of minority investors from conflicts of interest through one set of indicators and shareholders’ rights in corporate governance through another. The data come from a questionnaire administered to corporate and securities lawyers and are based on securities regulations, company laws, civil procedure codes and court rules of evidence. These scores are the sum of the extent of conflict of interest regulation index and the extent of shareholder governance index. To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about the business and the transaction are used. In Austria, for example, derivative suits are available for shareholders holding 10% of share capital. The prejudicial transaction cannot be voided. Adding these numbers gives Austria a score of 5 on the extent of director liability index. The index ranges from 0 to 10, with higher values indicating greater powers of shareholders to challenge the transaction. In Croatia, for example, shareholder holding 10% of Buyer’s shares can directly review documents related to suspected mismanagement by Mr. James and the CEO without filing suit in court. Adding these numbers gives Croatia a score of 6 on the ease of shareholder suits index. The extent of shareholder governance index is the sum of the extent of shareholder rights, extent of ownership and control and extent of corporate transparency indices. The protecting minority investors indicator set captures changes related to the regulation of related-party transactions as well as corporate governance every year. The change must be mandatory, meaning that failure to comply allows shareholders to sue in court or for sanctions to be levelled by a regulatory body such as the company registrar, the capital market authority or the securities and exchange commission. The changes must affect the rights and duties of issuers, company managers, directors, and shareholders in connection with related party transactions or, more generally, the aspects of corporate governance measured by the indicators. For example, in each economy, related-party transactions must be approved by the board of directors including board members who have a personal financial interest in seeing the transaction succeed.
Besides if you do have any questions give me a call: https://clarity.fm/joy-brotonath
Related Questions
-
When's the best time to raise capital for your startup?
The best time to raise capital for a startup is when you have a clear idea of what you want to do and a clear idea of how much money you need to get to a milestone that will set a higher value for your company. In general its better to bootstrap and do friends and family as long as you can, because the more mature and successful you are the better deal you will get from angels or VCs.Alexander CrutchfieldAC
-
What does it take to become an investor?
You’re asking some great questions, and beyond the fact that there is no teacher as great as experience, it seems tragic how common this experience is, and making great investments is hard even for seasoned professionals. But it’s incredible how often the only two factors used to assess an investment are how much it will make, and how much they like (or know) the people running the deal, when just a few additional questions can often make all the difference. When looking at a new opportunity, the first thing I do is ask if I believe management’s story. This is really about getting a feel for whether you believe the people running the business or opportunity are qualified to exploit whatever inefficiency they have identified in the marketplace. If they can’t express in simple terms what that opportunity is, why they’re qualified to take advantage of it, and exactly how what they do will generate returns for the investor – run away. This is different than asking if I believe in the management, or like them – it’s about their ability to state in plain language their investment thesis, and back it up with the skills and tools needed to execute. Next, put it in context - consider the size of the opportunity and this investment’s place in it. Is it a big market, or small? Lots of competition or not? Does this investment bring something new to the space and will gains come from new business or is the plan to take it from existing competitors? If there are no crisp answers to these sizing questions, consider it a big red flag. The next bit is about understanding the risk of the investment. The single most common mistake made by investors is mis-pricing risk. Markets are pretty efficient, so there has to be a reason someone else isn’t already doing whatever this investment proposes to do and understanding what this dynamic is can be the single difference between good and bad investments. It may be that nobody has thought of it, or no one can do what this will do at the same low cost. Or there is an asymmetry of information, where you know something others in the market don’t yet know. Whatever it is, trying to understand the risk of the investment is key: understanding the timing of the probable returns, appreciating what could go wrong and how management will respond if it does, what change in the environment (like new laws, new competitors, new technology) could turn the deal on its head, and what assumptions need to remain true through the course of the investment. I’m not sure there is any way to get all of the right before making an investment, and surprises always happen, but the more work done to figure this part out can help determine whether the investment is worth making based on what its expected to return, and it often highlights something just plainly wrong with an investment. Finally, know that there are very few great investment opportunities relative to the number of absolute junk stories out there, and finding ones that make sense for your risk tolerance and timeline just takes work. And experience. And even when you get everything right, sometimes good investments still go bad.Matt GelberMG
-
In a startup with a globally-spread remote team, does it still make sense to incorporate in U.S./Delaware vs. somewhere overseas?
Delaware C-Corp I usually Delaware is the best choice for any startup looking for fundraising with a US focus. However, if you are a remote and global team, an overseas or foreign corporation or US tax purposes might make sense. You'd have to talk to an advisor who can dive into your situation, but it would be more difficult for the US owner come tax time, as he'd likely have to file form 5471 to the IRS for any controlled foreign corporation, and form 90-22.1 for any foreign bank accounts. There are a lot of other concerns I didn't hear you raise that entrepreneurs usually have and ask me about, namely banking and merchant accounts/ payment processors. In terms of accepting online payments, any US corporation or LLC is far and away the best option for a company. It's difficult to suggest without knowing more about the company but you might explore Delaware, Wyoming, Hong Kong and other offshore jurisdictions for your legal entity. Each tend to have positives and negatives and there is no one size fits all solution. I do write about issues of incorporation quite regularly on my website FlagTheory.com - so you can read those articles for free, or we can schedule a call - Clarity.fm/incorporation when you have specific questions. Thank you and hope this was helpful!Edmund JohnEJ
-
How do you get exposure on AngelList to attract angel investors?
What of the following things does your startup have? > Founders who have graduated from prestigious universities / previously exited companies to known acquirers / worked for a known companies (with known being a brand-name company such as Google, Amazon, Facebook etc) > Three or more months of statistically meaningful growth (e.g. for easy sake, double digit growth of a number in the thousands) > At least one investor who is active on AngelList (defined in the ideal state by at least one investment in a company who raised their round through AngelList and ideally whose social graph is connected to "high signal" members of the AngelList network) If you have none of these things, then at least, have advisors and referrers who have a strong AngelList profile. And another option is to seek out the AngelList scouts and pitch them directly. They are more open to this than anyone else and I've seen companies with very little traction and very little social proof get featured because a scout believes in the founder and/or the story. Without any or most of the above, it will be difficult to stand out or build relationships via AngelList, in my opinion. I assume now AngelList operates on a concept similar to the LinkedIn "degrees of connection" model, whereby an entrepreneur can now send unsolicited messages to investors so long as there is a degree of connection between the investor and the company. I get a few unsolicited emails a week from companies whose advisers or investors aren't people I follow but that because of the way they determine "connection strength", these unsolicited emails still gain my attention. I assume this is the case for all investors. So the more that you can build your list of advisers and referrers, the more connections you can solicit. That said, AngelList's inbound email system is almost entirely ineffective for "cold" emails to really high-profile investors. Happy to share with you what I think to be your best options for raising profile for your company.Tom WilliamsTW
-
I want to invest (buy) online business but I lack expertise in running/owning one. I am looking for partners. Where can I meet them (online/offline)?
I know couple of businesses which could be of your interest to you. At the same time, since I have been 3-4 businesses simultaneously for quite sometime and also share similar vision like yours, Would you be interested in a short discussion? Fyi, I am also on the lookout of partners who can support hand in hand. Lets discuss...Sharique NisarSN
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.
