Loading...
Answers
MenuIn a startup with a globally-spread remote team, does it still make sense to incorporate in U.S./Delaware vs. somewhere overseas?
Answers
Delaware C-Corp
I usually Delaware is the best choice for any startup looking for fundraising with a US focus.
However, if you are a remote and global team, an overseas or foreign corporation or US tax purposes might make sense.
You'd have to talk to an advisor who can dive into your situation, but it would be more difficult for the US owner come tax time, as he'd likely have to file form 5471 to the IRS for any controlled foreign corporation, and form 90-22.1 for any foreign bank accounts.
There are a lot of other concerns I didn't hear you raise that entrepreneurs usually have and ask me about, namely banking and merchant accounts/ payment processors.
In terms of accepting online payments, any US corporation or LLC is far and away the best option for a company.
It's difficult to suggest without knowing more about the company but you might explore Delaware, Wyoming, Hong Kong and other offshore jurisdictions for your legal entity. Each tend to have positives and negatives and there is no one size fits all solution.
I do write about issues of incorporation quite regularly on my website FlagTheory.com - so you can read those articles for free, or we can schedule a call - Clarity.fm/incorporation when you have specific questions.
Thank you and hope this was helpful!
I mainly do business in Latin America and have found quite advantageous to be in Incorporated in Delaware as a "C" corp. As long as you are able to do "transactions" via credit cards for services (gets trickier w/ merchandise) you should be OK, except with countries like Venezuela and Argentina where tight controls are imposed on the dollar.
Happy to jump on a call and share our experience.
This is a complex topic because as you've so rightly mentioned it's very multi-dimensional so it matters a lot what your top priorities are. Let's start with the basics:
1. As a Canadian co-owner of a US corporation you're going to get screwed on taxes. First the US has the highest corporate taxes in the world so you'll be nailed with those, then you've got US dividend withholding taxes to deal with and finally Canadian taxation.
2. You don't have to choose between Canada or the US you could potentially choose somewhere else entirely. People tend only to think of the places where they are involved but as soon as you cross borders the whole world opens up to you.
All of this being said it is highly likely a portion of the income is going to be taxable in the US regardless and Canada regardless because you don't just get taxed based on where you're incorporated you also get taxed based on where you've got a "permanent establishment" and managers and sales people among others are considered "permanent establishments" under the terms of the tax treaty.
Usually, if you've got sufficient scale the best approach in these cases isn't to form just one company but multiple and if you do it well you could actually end up with an incredibly favorable tax position over being based in just one or the other. That being said this takes extra cost and administration so if you're just getting started and not making much money it doesn't make sense.
If you're raising money from Silicon Valley VCs you've essentially got just two choices that are worth considering, a Delaware or California company but this is where sometimes you can use a hybrid structure to get the best of both worlds.
Feel free to contact me if you'd like to discuss details.
My answer will:
1️⃣ Give you a clear summary up front
2️⃣ Walk through real-world trade-offs, not just theory
3️⃣ Point out where previous answers were vague, too technical, or missed what founders actually need to know
✅ TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)
If you plan to raise venture capital, sell to U.S. customers, or eventually exit via acquisition or IPO — incorporating in Delaware is still the best move, even with a global team.
Yes, there are tax and immigration headaches for Canadian founders, but these can be managed with the right structure.
Unless you’re staying bootstrapped or focused purely on Canadian/global customers, most investors will expect a Delaware C-Corp.
🧠 Full Answer
You’re in the gray zone where “it depends” becomes very real. But let’s make it practical:
⚖️ 1. If You Want U.S. Funding — Delaware Wins
Most serious U.S. investors (especially VCs) expect a Delaware C-Corp, full stop.
They know the legal landscape, prefer the predictability, and are usually structured to invest only in U.S. entities.
❗ A Canadian corporation may make them pause or walk.
🌍 2. If You're Bootstrapped or Non-U.S. Focused — Consider Canada or Offshore
If your revenue is coming from outside the U.S., and you’re not seeking venture funding, a Canadian corporation or an offshore jurisdiction (like BVI, Estonia, or even the UAE) may offer:
✅ Simpler compliance
✅ Lower effective tax rates
✅ Easier founder mobility
BUT: if you have U.S. customers, employees, or infrastructure, the U.S. will likely still claim a tax footprint (called a permanent establishment).
🧾 3. Canadian Founder in a U.S. Corp — Here’s What You Need to Know
You may face double taxation risk if not structured carefully
You’ll need to file IRS Form 5471 (foreign ownership of U.S. corp)
Withholding taxes may apply on dividends you receive from the U.S.
You can visit the U.S. as a Canadian under a B1/B2 visa for up to 6 months for business meetings — you just can’t work in the U.S. physically
A hybrid structure (Delaware C-Corp + Canadian management or subsidiary) can help optimize both taxes and founder flexibility
🛠️ 4. What Actually Works in Real Life (Startups Like Yours)
Goal Best Setup
Raise U.S. VC or Angel Funds ✅ Delaware C-Corp (even with global team)
Serve global clients, stay lean ✅ Canadian corp or offshore structure
Sell U.S. goods, process USD ✅ U.S. entity helps with banking, Stripe, etc.
Avoid U.S. tax complexity ❌ Not realistic if you have U.S. operations
Starting lean? You can always restructure later. But if funding or exit is your goal, start with what investors understand.
🔍 What Others Missed or Said Wrong
❌ “Just incorporate overseas” – Oversimplified. If you're hiring in or selling into the U.S., the IRS won’t care where you're registered. They’ll tax based on activity.
❌ “Form multiple companies” – Sounds smart, but adds cost, complexity, and admin most early-stage startups can’t afford. Better as a later-stage tax strategy.
❌ “You’ll get screwed on taxes as a Canadian” – That’s only true if you don’t plan around it. With the right CPA and structure, you can reduce or defer most pain points.
🧭 Final Word
✅ If you’re building for growth, funding, or exit — incorporate in Delaware.
✅ If you’re staying lean and bootstrapped, a Canadian or offshore structure could work — but only if you avoid U.S. hires, infrastructure, and revenue.
Was this breakdown helpful? If yes, I’d appreciate an upvote.
If you want to walk through your setup in detail and avoid costly mistakes — happy to schedule a call.
Related Questions
-
What are the tax consequences for founders if the seed round investors take common stock instead of preferred?
There shouldn't be any tax consequences for the founders if you've made 83b elections--the election meant you paid tax already on the full value of the stock at the time of the election (presumably zero) even though it was subject to future forfeiture. If you sell newly-issued stock there should be no tax impact. If you sell your own common stock, you'd pay tax on the gain, but I doubt that is what you mean here. Of course, you should not take the free advice dispensed on Clarity and consult your own tax preparer--this is not tax advice.BS
-
What does it take to become an investor?
You’re asking some great questions, and beyond the fact that there is no teacher as great as experience, it seems tragic how common this experience is, and making great investments is hard even for seasoned professionals. But it’s incredible how often the only two factors used to assess an investment are how much it will make, and how much they like (or know) the people running the deal, when just a few additional questions can often make all the difference. When looking at a new opportunity, the first thing I do is ask if I believe management’s story. This is really about getting a feel for whether you believe the people running the business or opportunity are qualified to exploit whatever inefficiency they have identified in the marketplace. If they can’t express in simple terms what that opportunity is, why they’re qualified to take advantage of it, and exactly how what they do will generate returns for the investor – run away. This is different than asking if I believe in the management, or like them – it’s about their ability to state in plain language their investment thesis, and back it up with the skills and tools needed to execute. Next, put it in context - consider the size of the opportunity and this investment’s place in it. Is it a big market, or small? Lots of competition or not? Does this investment bring something new to the space and will gains come from new business or is the plan to take it from existing competitors? If there are no crisp answers to these sizing questions, consider it a big red flag. The next bit is about understanding the risk of the investment. The single most common mistake made by investors is mis-pricing risk. Markets are pretty efficient, so there has to be a reason someone else isn’t already doing whatever this investment proposes to do and understanding what this dynamic is can be the single difference between good and bad investments. It may be that nobody has thought of it, or no one can do what this will do at the same low cost. Or there is an asymmetry of information, where you know something others in the market don’t yet know. Whatever it is, trying to understand the risk of the investment is key: understanding the timing of the probable returns, appreciating what could go wrong and how management will respond if it does, what change in the environment (like new laws, new competitors, new technology) could turn the deal on its head, and what assumptions need to remain true through the course of the investment. I’m not sure there is any way to get all of the right before making an investment, and surprises always happen, but the more work done to figure this part out can help determine whether the investment is worth making based on what its expected to return, and it often highlights something just plainly wrong with an investment. Finally, know that there are very few great investment opportunities relative to the number of absolute junk stories out there, and finding ones that make sense for your risk tolerance and timeline just takes work. And experience. And even when you get everything right, sometimes good investments still go bad.MG
-
When's the best time to raise capital for your startup?
The best time to raise capital for a startup is when you have a clear idea of what you want to do and a clear idea of how much money you need to get to a milestone that will set a higher value for your company. In general its better to bootstrap and do friends and family as long as you can, because the more mature and successful you are the better deal you will get from angels or VCs.AC
-
Where to incorporate a new software as a service busines?
I'll keep try to keep this answer brief, but there are several factors and nuances that can be discussed in more depth. Where you decide to incorporate partly depends on what your future goals are with your company. Companies that plan to seek venture capital or go public typically choose Delaware as the state of incorporation, and usually choose a C-Corp. Delaware has a very well developed body of law surrounding corporate governance and that provides comfort and more certainty to future VC investors. If you're not planning to seek VC money any time soon, an LLC is a smart decision because of the tax benefits it can provide to you as the owner. It sounds like you want to grow your company on your own without outside financing. If that's the case, I would recommend forming your LLC in California. Regarding California vs. Delaware, one benefit to forming your LLC in California is that you can avoid paying a registered agent fee which can cost anywhere from $100-200 a year. If you plan to seek venture capital down the road, you can reincorporate in Delaware.JI
-
What is the best business structure for a tech company?
It depends :) Financing: When you're ready to start raising funds, C Corps (especially Delaware) are still preferred in the VC world although some angels are increasingly willing to invest in LLCs. Risk: When you're just starting off it's okay to have a holding LLC with DBAs. As you grow one or more of the ideas, you may want to separate out the risk so that if one company has issues it doesn't hurt the others. But it isn't necessary when you're early on. Once you add employees, cofounders, and/or investors, it's probably time. Your holding LLC could have equity in the idea and you could setup the idea as a C Corp. It's a good structure. Also -- this ain't legal advice. Just general blahblahblah about legal structure. Really good article from a fellow Seattle startup attorney here: http://www.startuplawblog.com/choice-of-entity/BH
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.