Loading...
Answers
MenuDoes it ever make sense to offer ala cart pricing to SaaS customers where each module has it's own plans?
Answers
Hi,
I understand that it feels that it makes no sense, but you are right that it feels right in some way.
I actually wrote about this, How is SaaS different from MRR? People get confused a lot about it and think they can adapt monetization strategy to the model. Please read
https://medium.com/@JDcarlu/how-is-saas-different-from-mrr-9e7a7edd0edb
Also I did a small study on a SaaS company called Mattermark, and talked about this too. Maybe it can help you as an example
https://medium.com/@JDcarlu/mattermark-for-everyone-b9d92e6a8831
Hope this help you!
Pricing could be tricky at times, as there always remains a chance to undermine the perceived value of a product/service to cost. Companies often rely on benchmarking to decide pricing of a product/service. However, the mistake they often make is not to make Apple-to-Apple comparison. For example: A typical SaaS product could be of diverse types, even if they all are termed as CRM or something else. Benchmarking could be a fatal mistake in such scenarios.
Ala cart pricing could be a good idea to differentiate one plan with another. But, do ensure that the perceived value always outweighs the cost, per plan. Rather than to be ala cart or not, your concern should be to understand whether your planned price points optimum or not? Just remember a fact that, even if pricing is usually discussed in isolation, your brand value and image is depends on pricing.
I hope above helps!! Need any further input? Please feel free to reach out with more clarity.
Having different subscription plans makes sense in two scenarios. First, if each module is itself a service that a customer might subscribe to on it's own then it makes sense. Second, if you are charging based on metered usage like AWS.
In the first scenario where each module is it's own service you could construct subscription plans for each and provide discounts to incentivize customers to use more than one module. If these are just add-ons to a core service then I don't think this is a good idea. It just makes the decision more complicated for your customer.
Related Questions
-
How can I find clients that pay $50-100/h for web/mobile development, while even with huge experience I always get $10-15/h?
The first thing you need to do is believe you can get those kinds of rates. You question is littered with reasons why you can't - but the first question you need to ask is "Is there anyone doing development living in Brazil getting paid $100+/hour for their work" - the answer is YES. So, the better question to ask is "What are they doing different then me to get those rates?" I know I've paid for remote developers + designers at the $100/hour range, and the thing that justified it was. 1) I had a budget and have paid that kind of rate in the past 2) They're past work, portfolio, online profile, and all interactions with them world spectacular 3) They had passion for their work, almost like craftman. 4) I felt I could trust that they could over deliver on my expectations 5) They were focused on doing one thing great (ex: Mobile Design, iOS Dev, Ruby Dev) - they didn't do it all. 6) Someone I trusted vouched for them. You don't need all of them, maybe 2-3, but those are some of the things that come to mind.DM
-
Pricing strategy question: How do you determine whether to offer subscription pricing, transaction pricing or both?
As someone who has worked in pricing for almost 30 years, I know that one of the biggest myths of pricing is that you should only offer one pricing model. Offer two - both subscription & transactional. Customers will self-select &/or the market will segment, and you will quickly find out what is their preferred pricing model. As an aside, another pricing myth is that you can low-ball your pricing and raise prices later. Its successful in ~10% of attempts. By default, the choice of pricing models also states the obvious. Its not about what you want. Its about what the customer wants. And yes, you should have three choices. One choice gives you a 50:50 chance of closing the sale. Two choices forces the customer to make a price-based decision. Three choices, and the customer says "which one do I buy?" not "do I buy from this outfit?" and secondly they are forced to make a value-based decision. Also think about creating a decoy product, and on the pricing page on your website, lay the packages out dearest on the left, cheapest on the right. Happy to chat further about any of the above...or more!JM
-
Does odd pricing turn you off (e.g., $29 vs $30)?
For me personally, no. However, what you really need is a larger data set. Gumroad just did a post on prices ending in "9": http://blog.gumroad.com/post/64417917582/a-penny-saved-psychological-pricing 37signals started with prices that ended in 9: http://37signals.com/svn/posts/1287-ask-37signals-how-did-you-come-up-with-pricing-for-your-products ... but they later did research and found it didn't matter (for them). The answer for YOU will likely be to test these things for yourself on your SaaS app.JJ
-
What's a reasonable profit margin on merchandise?
Are you the manufacturer or reseller? If you are the reseller, typically about 40-50% above cost. Use the MSRP as an indicator.ZR
-
How can I convince customers that we offer a fair price if we're providing a new service that does not yet exist?
What you are asking for has one simple answer: Marketing. I assume however that you would want a more specific how to guide for such marketing efforts. I won't venture in giving you a ton of possible irrelevant examples but I would like start our conversation by saying that if there is no market demand and you do have a clever useful product you need to market the emotional need and consider why it hasn't been served. When you find that this is what you leverage.HV
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.