Loading...
Answers
MenuShould I continue developing my site further or keep a simple landing page with email capture to test my idea?
I have a landing page setup, do I develop the site further (be able to offer the product) and then upon order completion capture details? or leave it as a simple landing page with EOI capture (email)? (the former would entail additional spending as I am not a dev)
Answers
Depends on your objective.
If you really just want to know whether the idea is viable, you'll get the most bang for your buck by keeping things email-capture-only or putting up a "smoke test" where you have a Buy Now button that redirects to a "it's not available yet; but leave your email if you want to be notified when it's ready"... and see if you can get anyone to click "buy now" by clearly articulating on your landing page what the product will do for them. This also lets you test pricing sensitivity.
If you can't get anyone to leave an email or click "buy now" based on a really good description with images (or even better a video "demo") then building the actual product is unlikely to be worth it.
I have worked with startups for more than 15 years, mostly as a seed stage (pre revenue) VC.
More and more, funders and other stakeholders look towards third party proof points (e.g. users). If you can build a mock up or MVP great, but even a simple landing page with EOI proves that what you are working on may have legs.
Better to test, early and often is what the Lean Startup teaches us. Once you have proven something, only then move on, invest more, and build out. First search for problem/solution fit, then product / market fit, then scale.
If you'd like to discuss, drop me a follow up note and I can share more thoughts and resources.
capture the "intention" first and once you gauge the real interest continue building.
Use google forms to set up leads or interest, probably the best way to do it
http://www.google.com/forms/about/
Instead of building the product first, try and see if you could use some existing service to test our your market. For e.g. you could start a Facebook Group, or a mailing list to run things manually for a while. Get the user engagement, get a lot of feedback. And once you have enough material to work on, build the product.
In other words, get to market without building a product if you can. It's always easier to get some traction on existing (social networking and other) sites than a new standalone site.
1.Build the LP - converts?- If yes, move to step 2. If not, keep changing the traffic sources, message, style, features, product till something makes it convert. When it works, move to step 2.
2. Build the website like you have built the product but you haven't - If it converts build the product. If it doesn't, try step 3
3. Build a demo, simple video, all the stuff to show how your product works though you are yet to build the product - still doesn't convert? - Chuck it or pivot. If it works, build the product.
Related Questions
-
What's the best way to build a MVP web app that handles order management, purchasing, invoicing, supplier management and inventory?
The best way to build an MVP for any SaaS product is to create a landing page that looks like a real product. Here's an example of one I built. http://www.happiily.com In this case, it advertises the primary features of the product and invites people to sign-up. When they do, they are asked for information which qualifies the person and then sends me an email. I built this quickly and very inexpensively and started getting inbound leads from it shortly thereafter. I got on the phone with each person who signed-up and explained the features I wanted to build and was able to do a lot of customer learning based on that. Happy to talk to you in a call if you'd like to talk more about customer development with SaaS products.TW
-
When is it better to find a technical co-founder before developing an MVP vs. hiring a freelancer to build it for you, and vice-versa?
A co-founder is a long-term relationships that should be built on trust, and passion, and time... time to fight, time to recover, time to build rapport. Ultimately, your co-founder shouldn't be based on *any* specific idea, because the two (or three?) of you could work on anything you are all passionate about, and either experience wild success or learn some great lessons along the way. An MVP doesn't require a co-founder get built. In fact, the less technical code required the better. You should be able to validate most ideas with some very basic tools: WordPress site, Email list, a set of google forms, and a little love. I think the most important question to ask yourself is, "Am I willing to have my idea change for the right person? Or am I just trying to find the best person to execute on my idea?" For what it's worth, I've seen much more success with the former than the latter.TK
-
Are you at risk of your competitors copying your features by building MVPs?
Yep. Although I don't think that's limited to MVPs. It's just always the case. You can copy code, features, etc. but you can't copy soul. There will always be people who copy you. It's better to keep moving forward and accept the copy cats than it would be to try and shield yourself. Keep an eye on the copy cats. But in the long run, if you're authentic and worthy, you will beat them.JR
-
iOS App: Beta vs Launch Quietly?
I would suggest launching in a foreign app store only (ex: Canada). That will allow you to get more organic users to continue iterating without a big push. I got this idea from Matt Brezina (Founder of Sincerely, previously Xobni) https://clarity.fm/brezina - he's the man when it comes to testing & iterating mobile apps.DM
-
Shall we register our company before testing the MVP?
I do not believe you should incorporate your company yet as there is a chance you will scrap the idea or iterate on the assumptions after analysis. I suggest you run your initial testing on a very minimal MVP to see if there is interest. I would go further in saying that you should not even allow people to pay only have them click on the payment option because at that point you know that it would be a conversion. The ONLY thing you are proving with an MVP is validation of an idea. Only make the mousetrap front end and see if you can drive users to where you want and stop. Even if you frustrate some people, it was worth it as you now know for sure people will buy or do what it is you wanted. Schedule a call with me to find out more. God knows I have done this enough times. Good luck JoshJJ
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.