Is a subscription based model a viable monetization strategy for a mobile medical app? Is the app industry shifting towards this?

As I often advise startups, there is never a rule; especially with consumer facing and modern technologies. However, to get you in the right direction regarding monetization, I usually tell my audience a good differentiator between subscription and inapp (unlock) should be frequency and type of use.
If you have a static knowledge base you're giving, subscription is best.
Non-consumable in-apps should only be used if you can structure your startup to deliver new ones regularly.
Consumable in-apps should be for something that gets executed, a function, therefore not good for content but perhaps some kind of medical analysis?

Also, don't forget subscriptions are much more lucrative now but don't be tricked into picking what makes the most money without keeping in mind what is best for your offering.

Obviously more than glad to further discuss if you can give me specific answers in order to find a winning strategy.

While most of the experts that replied all have valid points, the main issue I see is that pushing any app down the monetize by paid ads method is in high risk right now because the next version of IOS will block ads, Apple is on the war path to kill ads on their devices. Why is that a problem? what % does apple represent in your niche? greater than 50%.

Subscription is the best path in my opinion, and yes the industry is shifting towards that model, not because thats what the users want, but it makes more sense for a business to offer subscription based services.

I could provide a more tailored answer if I knew more about your app.