Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat are some examples of bootstrapped companies that successfully scaled (to big proportions) WITHOUT VC funding?
I want to build a B2B product, but I want to do it without VC funding. Am I crazy? Will I be forever doomed/preventing my company from scaling?
Answers
I'm the Founder of a VC-backed company and I'm also an investor in a handful of other companies that are venture-backed.
I'll answer the meat of your question. If you're building a B2B product, you *should* do it without VC funding.
The reason for this is simple: Amongst the criteria of investment decisions for VCs, the most important is the belief (supported by evidence) that the business can become a Billion dollar business.
For consumer companies, revenue is currently proving to be a constraining factor in valuation. In other words, in optimizing for selling equity at the highest valuation, consumer companies are best to make no money at all.
Enterprise companies are evaluated mostly on their current revenue, their pipeline, and core metrics around the business model and selling model and have a much more constrained set of valuation criteria.
Consumer companies almost always require considerable funding to grow because they lack sufficient means to generate revenue until significant scale. This is not the case with B2B.
I'm of the view that true B2B startups should be generating revenue from day one. Even if you intend on having a freemium model, it should only be rolled-out after you've launched to serve paying customers.
A B2B business has to first have a clear credible path to $100k MRR (monthly recurring revenue) in order to attract institutional seed and Series A funding.
Unless you're really on that path, you're best to avoid venture funding altogether. Reinvest your revenue into growth, stay lean and when you exhaust your own resources, raise under $1,000,000 in funding from angel investors and consider that the last equity money you ever raise until you are clearly and credibly on track to achieve $100k MRR. And by the way, achieving this incredibly difficult metric isn't the only requirement. Your Total Addressable Market has to be also significant enough to show that you can get to at least $100m ARR.
By the way, once you generate $1m in annual recurring revenue, you will have access to debt facilities that can fund your growth with far less (if any) dilution.
So I would posit that the vast majority of great B2B products will fail to achieve VC fundraising simply because most great B2B products don't *need* to achieve these proof-points for them to be fantastic businesses for a relatively small shareholder group.
I think a lot of entrepreneurs are getting really terrible advice and being pushed to lie to themselves and others that they are capable of and even want to swing for the billion-dollar outcome.
Happy to talk through this answer with you in more detail over a call.
The reality of
Depends on how you define big, but the easy answer is yes. We built our last company from nothing into a successful business. We were in the B2B space. Our customers when we sold included Apple, Xerox, Harley-Davidson,Chicago Bulls and many more. Never took a penny from VC's or Angels. When we closed the sale we owed nothing. We kept a line of credit, but never used it. When we closed it was for an eight figure amount. If you want to discuss more we are happy to set up a call.
Moz.com (originally SEOMoz.com) was built with credit card debt. You can hear Rand Fishkin talk about how he did that (and NOT recommending running up that much debt) in the video at http://www.growtheverywhere.com/rand-fishkin-moz/
Related Questions
-
What advice do you give to a 16 year old entrepreneur with a start up idea?
First, hat tip to you for being a young entrepreneur. Keep it up! If you have the funds to build out your MVP, hire a developer and possibly a mentor. If your idea is marketable, you don't need to give up equity by bringing in a co-founder. If this is your entrepreneurial venture, I would recommend you do retain a coach to help you see all the things you may not know. Have you already done your SWOT analysis? Have you identified your target market? What is your marketing plan? What will be your operating expenses? There are lots of questions to ask. If you would a free call, I'd be happy to help you in more detail. Just use this link to schedule your free call... https://clarity.fm/kevinmccarthy/FreeConsult Best regards, Kevin McCarthy Www.kevinmccarthy.comKM
-
I have this social media idea,but no coding skills. How do I get someone to do the coding (cant afford to pay them) and not give away half of my idea?
Dilip was very kind in his response. My answer might be a bit on the "tough love" side. But that's for you to decide. My intention, just for the record, is to help you (and those like you) on your path to success. And that starts with having a viable philosophy about entrepreneurial-ism and business. And I'm going to answer this because I get asked some form / version of this question very frequently from newcomers to entrepreneurial-ism. The scenario goes something like this: "I have a great idea. It's amazing, I love it, and I just KNOW it's gonna make me a ton of money. But I have no money right now so I can't afford to (fill in the blank with things like "to build it / create it / market it / etc" or "to hire the required staff needed to work in my business to sell it / develop it / etc"). And I don't want to tell anyone about my great idea because I'm worried someone will steal it and make MY million / billion dollars. But I can't afford to legally protect it either... So how do I launch without the skills to personally create the product AND no money to hire anyone else to do that either??" The answer is ... You don't. Look - let's be honest. All you have is an idea. Big deal. Really. I'm not saying it's not a good idea. I'm not saying that if properly executed it couldn't make you a million / billion dollars... But an idea is NOT a business. Nor is it an asset. Until you do some (very important) initial work - like creating a business model, doing customer development, creating a MVP, etc - all you really have is a dream. Right now your choices are: 1. Find someone with the skills or the money to develop your idea and sell them on WHY they should invest in you. And yes, this will mean giving up either a portion of the "ownership" or of future income or equity. And the more risk they have to take - the more equity they will want (and quite frankly be entitled to). 2. Learn how to code and build it yourself. MANY entrepreneurs without financial resources are still resourceful. They develop the skills needed to create what they don't have the money to pay someone else to do. 3. Get some cash so you can pay someone to do the coding. You'll probably have to have some knowledge of coding to direct the architecture of your idea. So you will likely still have to become knowledgeable even if its not you personally doing the coding. (This is not meant to be a comprehensive list of options... And I'm sure some of the other experts here on Clarity have others to add - and I hope they do) To wrap up - Here's my final tip to you that I hope you "get"... It's FAR more valuable to have an idea that a very specific hungry crowd is clamoring for right now - One that THEY would love and pay you for right now - Maybe even one they'd pre-order because they just have to have it - Versus YOU being in love with your own idea. [Notice I didn't say "an idea that some as-of-yet-undetermined market would probably love"] I wish you the best of luck moving forward.DB
-
How much equity is typically taken by investors in a seed round?
From my experience I would not advise you to go with Venture Capital when you're a start-up as in the end they will most likely end up screwing you. A much better source for funding would be angel investors or friends/family. The question of how much equity should I give away differs for every start-up. I remember with my first company I gave away 30% because I wanted to get it off the ground. This was the best decision I ever made. Don't over valuate your company as having 70% of something is big is a whole lot better than having 100% of something small. You have to decide your companies value based on Assets/I.P(Intellectual Property)/Projections. I assume you have some follow up questions and I would love to help you so if you need any help feel free to call me. Kind Regards, GiulianoGS
-
How has Uber grown so fast?
Obviously, they do the fundamentals well. Good brand. Good experience. Good word of mouth. Good PR. Etc. Etc. But after my interview with Ryan Graves, the head of Global Operations at Uber (https://www.growthhacker.tv/ryan-graves), it became clear that they are operationally advanced and this is a huge part of their success. I'll explain. Uber isn't just a single startup, it's essentially dozens of startups rolled into one because every time they enter a new city they have to establish themselves from essentially nothing (except whatever brand equity has reached the city ahead of them). This means finding/training drivers, marketing to consumers, and building out local staff to manage operations for that city. This is where Ryan Graves comes in. He has a protocol of everything that must be done, and in what order, and by who, to ensure the best chance of success in a new city. So how has Uber grown so fast? Essentially, they figured out how to grow in one locale and were relentless about refining their launch process to recreate that initial success over and over in new cities. No plan works for every city, and they've had to adapt in many situations, but it is still a driving factor for their success.BT
-
How was SnapChat able to grow so quickly?
I'm answering your question assuming that you hope to be able to replicate it's own success in your own mobile app. There are a couple of factors responsible for it's growth that are instructive to anyone building a mobile app. "Leveraging the intimacy and privacy of the mobile phone." We now have an *intimate* relationship with our phone like no other device in the history of technology. Every internet company that started before around 2010 has built their core interactions around "the old web" one which was accessed primarily via a browser on a computer. Companies that start with a clean slate, should be building their interactions around how to do whatever the app is supposed to do while leveraging what is unique to people's relationship to their mobile devices. Photo-sharing has become a core part of the way we communicate now. Snapchat built something that provided an experience that leveraged the feeling of privacy and intimacy that is unique to mobile. "Provided an escape from the "maturity" of other online services." Too many parents, aunts, uncles and other "old people" have encroached into the social networks of teens and young people. As a result, they've had a desire to find places to express themselves in places inaccessible by older generations. An important distinction is that it's not just parents and relatives that young people are trying to avoid, but also employers & colleges who are increasingly using "mature" social networks to review applicants. "Leveraged PR even bad PR" The fact that the app got so much press about it being used to sext was perfect PR for the company, as it essentially reinforced the brand experience that it has today. Essentially, "if it's safe enough to send a sext, it's safe for any kind of communication I want to have." And although the safety and security of Snapchat is actually not as advertised, it still enjoys the reputation of having less impact than any primarily web-based service. Building a successful mobile application is one of the hardest challenges to face designers, programmers and entrepreneurs in the history of writing software. Happy to talk to you if you're considering building a mobile app, about what I've learned about the "table stakes" for success.TW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.