Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat is a good "go to market strategy" to reach potential customers and to get competitive advantage of incumbents?
I'm developing a new product for home to be used for specific function and with the feature to connect home to smartphones. I'll go to a new market with no competitors but the high probability to have incumbents in less than one year.
We have no metrics and no best cases, so we are a bit confused about the first move!
Answers
The best way to launch a product is to start promoting it before you release it on the market. Your strategy also should depend of how are you going to sell the product: online or in store.
Lead all of your marketing activities must lead to your website.
Here are some of the things you can do:
Make a good video explanation of the product. Show to people how it works and focus on the problems that it solves for them.
Build a buyer persona focused website. That is extremely important especially if you're selling online. It will skyrock your conversion rate.
Start building a community on the social media. Focus on building relationships with people, ask for their feedback.
Build a PR buzz around your brand. A great service you can use for that is MuckRack. There you can find journalist that are looking to write a story for exatly what you're looking to sell.
Make a keyword research and run some tests with Google Adwords. Make A/B testing with different landing pages to see what works better.
Focus on SEO and content marketing to bring visitors to your website.
If you tell me more, I will be able to help you better with a more concrete advice. I'm open for a free consultation. I'm sending you a VIP key for a free call.
You're not the only one confused., though I'm certainly interested to learn some more. If you're interested we can jump on a complimentary 30 minute call to see if we can clarify things a bit for you.
Own the language. Anticipate what people will search for in this niche and ensure that YOU will be the majority of what they find.
Here's a concrete example. Suppose that you are launching an innovative new product for helping people quit smoking: The nicotine patch.
If you're the company behind Nicoderm CQ, then you'll enter the market with guns blazing -- a gigantic advertising budget, strong patents, smart executives, and an innovative product that people genuinely need.
Great, right? Yes, but far from perfect. Fast forward to 2013. Patents expire. Nicoderm CQ, like most pharmaceutical brands, must now compete with knockoff generic nicotine patches, offering the same product at lower prices.
As dominant as Nicoderm CQ is, thanks to their brilliant execution of a traditional marketing strategy, they have left themselves exposed to market competition in a ridiculous way.
Specifically, they don't own NicotinePatches.com or NicotinePatch.com. Instead, I do.
In effect, the latecomers to this market niche can take a shortcut to brand authority by building their brand on the most universal descriptor of the product itself. In the long run, the familiarity of "Nicoderm CQ" will wear off. That will happen pretty much as soon as the advertising dollars stop pumping in. After all, there's nothing intuitive about "Nicoderm CQ" -- particularly the "CQ". Meanwhile, people will continue searching for "nicotine patches" online even with no input of advertising dollars whatsoever.
Anticipate. Own the language.
Despite its complexity designing go to market strategy and preparing go to market has some rules that can be generalised for any situation or organisation. Newly founded businesses, SMEs, enterprises, or NGOs could learn a lot from start-ups how to build traction on different channels and how to use rapid experimentation process. On the other hand, start-ups can benefit from understanding and managing complex distribution from large sales or distribution focused organisations, especially when designing marketplaces, platforms, and ecosystems. A start-up is a company designed to grow fast. Being newly founded does not in itself make a company a start-up. Nor is it necessary for a start-up to work on technology, or take venture funding, or have some sort of “exit.” The only essential thing is growth. Everything else we associate with start-ups follows from growth.
A lot of knowledge and wisdom how to design a Go-to-market and build your growth machine comes from venture capital investors and other people since their high-risk investments focus on companies that have high growth potential and they have been through this process repeatedly. The hardest part of designing a go to market strategy is to think about its execution at the same time you are building it. There many go to market frameworks available online that can be used for your specific situation. It can be just a simple diagram that organizes the dimensions of your Go-to market project in a helpful way that you share with your team. Understanding and framing your problem in an approachable way that you share with your team will bring clarity and speed of execution and a good framework enables us to execute better and faster. “Strong Opinions Weakly Held” approach is a framework to overcome biases and is the most effective way to make decisions when faced with complexity, uncertainty, and time pressure. There are lessons to be learned from companies outside your category. You can have an amazing product that is technically superior but with not having the right access to the market you will lose.
Enterprise with better distribution could launch something far inferior but would beat you in this process. Not getting initial traction for your product is often connected with spending too much time on building and not on allocating enough time and resources on distribution and attracting users. Sequoia Capital has followed a basic mantra “Market, product, team.” Understanding your Go-to-market strategy as a function of the primacy of sales or marketing is paramount.
Mark Leslie says, “If you’re marketing-intensive, the product is bought. If it is sales-intensive, the product is sold.” Mark Leslie uses a simple framework to quickly establish whether you have a sales-intensive or marketing-intensive product that you are bringing to the market. Besides smoother Go-to-market strategy, this process will help marketing and sales to better coordinate their efforts to win customers.
Start-ups are commonly instructed to just focus on product market fit in the early days. While I agree in the earliest phases you focus on proving Market Product Fit, that does not mean you can ignore the others. You need to find four fits to grow to $100M+ company in a venture-backed time frame. Market, product, channel, and model all must interact and work together as part of one constant ecosystem and Brian Balfour designed a framework to align all four fits and explained why you cannot think of them separately.
Building a great product is not an answer that your company will grow successfully. Great products have failed, while terrible products have grown to a huge company. “Go-to-Market Strategy is focused on how the organization will put offerings into the market to reach market penetration, revenue and profitability expectations. This charter is a superset of marketing strategy as it impacts all functions within an organization with the goal of preparing the entire company for market success.
A comprehensive GTM strategy includes a detailed analysis of your target markets, customer segments, budget requirements, offers, positioning and can take several weeks or longer to formulate. It is focused on the entire product lifecycle and has to be adjusted and changed when the market conditions change. The strategy includes positioning, brand, targeting, and segmentation. If you want to drive a competitive advantage in your go to market your segments need to be small enough to be actionable but big enough to be meaningful. Minimum viable product comes hand in hand with the minimum viable segment and his great start-up secret is that if your segmentation is based on needs that will lead that customer will reference each other. In the tactical part, the focus is on the marketing and sales cycle, driving to market and results-oriented and measured execution.
Go-to-market is both strategic and tactical and Skok believes just as Rome wasn’t built in a day so too your GTM strategy and tactics shouldn’t. GTM business model is driven through continuous integration and improvement and is results-oriented and execution driven.
When designing your go to market it is important to identify your market stage and the strategy required to cater to that phase. It is not what the seller wants to do but respect what the market needs. As Moore argues in his Crossing the Chasm book that there is a chasm between the early adopters of the product and early majority, therefore, is vital to identify your market stage, strategy required and plan for the next phase of the market.
It is not only the first mover advantage nor product-market-fit to dominate the market. If you figure out how to scale with velocity you can overtake successful players that were already in that market. Gil believes that most successful founders can see what others don’t by almost cloning themselves as a customer. You can crack through the markets by being product centric rather than customer centric.
When designing your Go-to-Market market machine you will have to align your GTM plans in operations, marketing, and sales and figure out how all this will be executed in the end. Initially, the go-to-market plan should only be created after gathering user insights and creating success metrics and that will inevitably mean that in the best of the circumstances you will have to tweak your go-to-market strategy.
Besides if you do have any questions give me a call: https://clarity.fm/joy-brotonath
Related Questions
-
Which country offers the best outsourcing value for tech entrepreneurs?
I've used outsourced services several times successfully. I don't think using geographic location is necessary a good indicator for outsourcing value. In my experience it depends on the type of service you are seeking. For example, I've used crowdsourcing services for logo and web designs and discovered creativity has no geographic boundaries. Neither is the skill level necessarily the only indicator for the best creative. Some designs have been submissions from design student or freelancers with no formal training. As for technical work, I seek service based on the following criteria: - technical competency and skills - communication skills - Process skills (to manage overall risk of project) - references from existing clients. Country is secondary to the above list.ID
-
What 3 questions to pose to a developer, to gauge his expertise level?
If you're not technical yourself, then you might not be able to gauge the efficiency of a candidate's algorithms or critique her code. But there are still some higher-level, more behavioral things that a non-technical interviewer should be looking for in a strong development candidate: 1. What are some tech blogs that you follow? Explain an interesting article to me that you read from one of them. The software development world changes all the time. Best practices are constantly evolving and new libraries are regularly released which make developers more productive. If a candidate doesn't keep up with the latest software news, that might be a red flag that they're not curious or trying to improve themselves. Also, having them explain a technical concept to someone who's non-technical is a great way to gauge their communication skills. Do they seem like someone you could work with and understand easily? Do they care about pausing to make sure you understand, or do they just drone on with jargon? If you feel overwhelmed while they're explaining this answer, imagine how you'll feel when they're telling you why the product has bugs or isn't going to be done on schedule. 2. Tell me about a time you ran into a big roadblock with something you were building. How did you get past it? It's inevitable that a software developer will get tripped up or have to solve some Gordian Knot. Everyone has to bang their head against the wall from time to time. Maybe an API didn't have the data they needed or some function was running too slow and they weren't sure how to speed it up. You're looking to see how they are as a problem solver. Did they come up with a clever but hacky solution? Were they methodical or did they fly by the seat of their pants? Did they go back to the stakeholders and see if the feature's requirements were flexible? Did they work on it for hours and hours trying new things? Did they ask for help from colleagues or on the internet? No right or wrong answers here, but you want to get the sense that this isn't someone who throws up their hands when they hit some friction. 3. Tell me about your favorite project that you worked on. What work are you most proud of? By asking them about the project they're most proud of, you'll get to see what it is that they value most. Maybe one candidate is most proud of a side project they built, even if it wasn't that technically complex, while another candidate is proud of their esoteric PhD project or some specific algorithm they improved. Again, no right or wrong answers, it really depends what type of candidate you're looking for. But it lets you see into their mind a bit, and get at some of the aspects that can make someone a strong development candidate. If you want to talk more specifically about hiring for your team, I'd be happy to do a call!HB
-
I am a non tech entrepreneur desperately trying to find answer to highly technical and nuanced questions on the cheap.
The best way would be to hire an expert on oDesk, etc. which is fairly cheap and also reliable. But It sounds like you want to go even cheaper than that. Try posting on StackExchange, which is free. Another cheap option is to check local Meetup.com tech gatherings in your area and ask some experts directly for free advice. Good luck!II
-
What does it mean to 'grandfather you in' in the tech world?
It stands for allowing someone to continue doing or use something that is normally no longer permitted (due to changing regulations, internal rules etc.)OO
-
Should you split equity equally with a tech cofounder if you have an MVP, some traction but you know that you're going to need a CTO when it takes off
If you and this person, *know* they won't be the CTO, then absolutely not. If there's an understanding that the engineer you are working with is going to "cap out" soon beyond the MVP, why would you ruin your cap table? This *should* help you get a reasonable amount of equity. http://foundrs.com/ The most crucial question is where this current contributor is likely going to be out of their element. Are they only front-end and have no back-end ability? If so, you really should raise (from a friend or family member) or borrow the money necessary to pay this person a reasonable cash rate. If on the other hand, they can take a successful MVP and build a reasonable back-end but will cap out on scaling it past 100,000 users, or for example, you're an enterprise company and you know you'll require a technical person to be part of closing early sales, then it's ok to give up meaningful equity. But another key question is: Are you ok to let this person define your company's engineering culture? If this person isn't capable of or comfortable managing your tech team in the early-days, this person should have no more than 10% equity. Of course, your shares and theirs (whatever you decide) should be subject to a vesting agreement (minimum 3 years and preferably 4). It's easy to give away equity when it's worth very little but as I've said here before on Clarity, imagine your company today being worth $100,000,000. Can you imagine this person contributing $20,000,000 worth of value to achieve that outcome? $30m? $50m? Here's the thing though. If this person can grow into a CTO, and wants the chance, and there's no warning signs that it will be a tough slog for them to get there, and they're a passionate believer in what's been built to date, then it's entirely reasonable to bet (with equity) that they can get there. I know a lot of CTO's of great Series A and beyond companies with amazing traction that started off as lacking a lot of the criteria of a great CTO candidate. This is an area I've helped coach a lot of startup CEOs through and have experience in myself. Happy to talk through in a call to understand the specifics of your scenario and provide more detailed advice.TW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.