Loading...
Answers
MenuHow to determine if software licensing is profitable or feasible? Suggestions on how to prospect for leads?
I am building a reporting platform that is integrated with automated infographic generation. We are exploring the possibility of integrating with existing software or platforms and system to help improve their reporting display for user.
However, I am unfamiliar with licensing model and need help to find potential prospects and conduct sales analysis & forecasting.
Answers
I mentor startups on the application of product management processes to help them make better decisions.
Before you try to do sales analysis and forecasting, you need to find out if your potential licensees see value in using your solution. The best way to do this is to talk to some of their product managers and find out what challenges they face. Are they struggling to differentiate with their competitors? Are they getting lots of complaints or requests for improved visualizations in their product?
Once you understand their situation as they view it, you can explore to see if your solution is valuable to them by solving one of their big problems. At the point where you understand the value to your potential licensees, you can start to test pricing.
Let me know if you need more help here. Cheers and good luck.
Willis & Shawn answer your question as you've asked it. I'm going to suggest a slightly different tack. Don't think about licensing at all, and don't spend any significant effort on attempting to sell licensing deals.
Instead, focus on building your product to a point where it's so great that people in your industry (including potential licensees) start sharing it with others. Product excellence will generate all the inbound leads you can handle.
Conversely, you could be the best salesperson in the world, and if your product isn't excellent or doesn't look too complex to replicate, then the likelihood of you generating sufficient momentum and motivation for someone internal to recommend that they license your product is pretty low.
I can only think of four reasons you'd be thinking about licensing right-now, and only one of them is a good reason:
1) The good one: You've got so much traction with your product and you've achieved the max of what you can do without raising more, and you'd rather license than build further.
2) The bad investor: Some investor has told you that (s)he thinks that licensing is the way to go or is crucial to their investment and has asked you to model it. If it were me, I'd walk away from that investor.
3) You don't know how to grow your business, and you think licensing will be a magic fix. It won't be.
4) You're over-thinking the business part of your startup. One of my investors who recently sold his company for a billion dollars, told me that at the startup stage, don't over-think your business. The only over-thinking energy should be in the product.
Happy to do a call with you to help you evaluate your best opportunities forward based on knowing more of the specific of your situation.
In such a case, you can run feasibility analysis.
Market failures, competitive pressures or unexpected developments in those products or systems may undermine your marketing efforts. Established market leaders can assert massive financial pressure on new product entrants through pricing strategies, promotion, and preferred supplier arrangements. Try to identify economic conditions and growth trends within the market where your product or invention will be sold. Intellectual property protection needs to be considered from the time of idea conception.
You can read more here: https://www.business.qld.gov.au/starting-business/planning/idea/feasibility
Besides if you do have any questions give me a call: https://clarity.fm/joy-brotonath
Related Questions
-
What are digital products or services you wish existed and why? How would they help you and/or your business?
As the owner of a web development firm, I am always inventing our own digital products and services. Any service that is web-based and accessible to mobile devices work as long as they solve a business need. The digital products I wish would exist are: 1. Home building services including videos by experienced builders 2. Mail and package weighing digital services 3. More security services for document transfer services. BruceBC
-
What is a better title for a startup head....Founder or CEO? Are there any pros/cons to certain titles?
The previous answers given here are great, but I've copied a trick from legendary investor Monish Pabrai that I've used in previous startups that seems to work wonders -- especially if your company does direct B2B sales. Many Founders/ CEOs are hung up on having the Founder/ CEO/ President title. As others have mentioned, those titles have become somewhat devalued in today's world -- especially if you are in a sales meeting with a large organization. Many purchasing agents at large organizations are bombarded by Founders/ CEOs/ Presidents visiting them all day. This conveys the image that a) your company is relatively small (the CEO of GM never personally sells you a car) and b) you are probably the most knowledgeable person in the organization about your product, but once you land the account the client company will mostly be dealing with newly hired second level staff. Monish recommends that Founder/ CEOs hand out a business card that has the title "Head of Sales" or "VP of Sales". By working in the Head of Sales role, and by your ability to speak knowledgeably about the product, you will convey the message that a) every person in the organization is very knowledgeable about the ins and outs of the product (even the sales guys) and b) you will personally be available to answer the client's questions over the long run. I've used this effectively many times myself.VR
-
A tech startup fully outsourced. What problems would be in this situation?
The ideal way would be to hire the engineer while the project is still under development. You and the engineer should follow up with the outsourced partner in the process. This will give hold to the engineer and later more staff can be trained in upgrading or follow on versions of the product/service.SM
-
Business partner I want to bring on will invest more money than me, but will be less involved in operations, how do I split the company?
Cash money should be treated separately than sweat equity. There are practical reasons for this namely that sweat equity should always be granted in conjunction with a vesting agreement (standard in tech is 4 year but in other sectors, 3 is often the standard) but that cash money should not be subjected to vesting. Typically, if you're at the idea stage, the valuation of the actual cash going in (again for software) is anywhere between $300,000 and $1m (pre-money). If you're operating in any other type of industry, valuations would be much lower at the earliest stage. The best way to calculate sweat equity (in my experience) is to use this calculator as a guide: http://foundrs.com/. If you message me privately (via Clarity) with some more info on what the business is, I can tell you whether I would be helpful to you in a call.TW
-
For every success story in Silicon Valley, how many are there that fail?
It all depends on what one decides to be a definition of a "success story." For some entrepreneurs, it might be getting acqui-hired, for some -- a $10M exit, for some -- a $200M exit, and for others -- an IPO. Based on the numbers I have anecdotally heard in conversations over the last decade or so, VCs fund about 1 in 350 ventures they see, and of all of these funded ventures, only about 1 in 10 become really successful (i.e. have a big exit or a successful IPO.) So you are looking at a 1 in 3500 chance of eventual venture success among all of the companies that try to get VC funding. (To put this number in perspective, US VCs invest in about 3000-3500 companies every year.) In addition, there might be a few others (say, maybe another 1-2 in every 10 companies that get VC investments) that get "decent" exits along the way, and hence could be categorized as somewhat successful depending on, again, how one chooses to define what qualifies as a "success story." Finally, there might also be companies that may never need or get around to seeking VC funding. One can, of course, find holes in the simplifying assumptions I have made here, but it doesn't really matter if that number instead is 1 in 1000 or 1 in 10000. The basic point being made here is just that the odds are heavily stacked against new ventures being successful. But that's also one of the distinguishing characteristics of entrepreneurs -- to go ahead and try to bring their idea to life despite the heavy odds. Sources of some of the numbers: http://www.nvca.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ven... https://www.pwcmoneytree.com/MTP... http://paulgraham.com/future.html Here are others' calculations of the odds that lead to a similar conclusion: 1.Dear Entrepreneurs: Here's How Bad Your Odds Of Success Are http://www.businessinsider.com/startup-odds-of-success-2013-5 2.Why 99.997% Of Entrepreneurs May Want To Postpone Or Avoid VC -- Even If You Can Get It http://www.forbes.com/sites/dileeprao/2013/07/29/why-99-997-of-entrepreneurs-may-want-to-postpone-or-avoid-vc-even-if-you-can-get-it/MB
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.