Loading...
Answers
MenuI have a self-funded prototype app, which experts say has massive potential. Shall I continue self funding or present it to investors?
The main reason for my question is that the development is becoming very costly
Answers
As a rule of thumb it's better for you to continue investing yourself as far as you can. The reasons are:
1. The later you raise money, the more your business should be worth
2. You are able to retain more control of the business
3. Fundraising is very time consuming and will divert your attention from making your business work
Having said that, if you're getting to the point where you can't continue to move the business forward (or at a good pace) without money then it's worth looking to fundraise.
Dan
I'll start by agreeing with what Dan said re: how timing of raising the funds impacts your ownership of the project, and that later (or never) is the best time to raise funds from that aspect. However, it isn't quite that simple, as I'm sure you know.
I would want you to consider 2 simple things (I'm not armed with enough information to analyze it myself - but feel free to private message me with details):
1. Expert validation is great - but how many actual users have interacted with your prototype? If the answer is none - or less than 100 - don't raise funds, get more users on the prototype.
2. Development of the app never stops (software right?) - but sometimes it needs to pause while people use it (so you can observe their use in detail) - or you are needlessly polishing.
Make sure that the "improvements" you make are steeped in findings from actual users, and that it actually improves their experience / outcomes in using your app. Too often, I see brilliant inventors, creators, developers or designers remain on their lab bench tinkering away on something that desperately needs the attention of an actual user.
Anytime you think "one more feature, one more tweak" really question the need for that change, particularly in the case that it is keeping you from releasing your app (or pushing an update live).
I'd be happy to help you determine which side of this curve you currently occupy. Often, all it takes is an objective, removed perspective to provide clarity.
Cheers,
Ryan
We self funded PopKey (a top 200 Utility app) as one of the first iOS keyboards. We waited until we were in the 6 figure range in users before we raised a dime. However, my business partner and I had to invest close to 1M of our own money to get it to where it is today. Very risky. I'm going to go against the grain here as a guy who has successfully bootstrapped an app and say if you can raise, raise fast and raise early. Just make sure you find right investors. They should be able to help you open the right doors. Also having some capital early will let you hire faster and get more momentum by buying users. Buying users matters more if you're in a winner takes all space and if it's a land grab.
We were lucky that we already had an in-house development team to leverage. We're also generating enough revenue now and have enough financial backing that we can continue to run PopKey independently for a long, long time.
Summary: if you want to go big raise early from the right investors.
My expertise, however is in bootstrapping, growth hacking, and lean start-up principles.
Fund it for as long as you possibly can. Start-ups are pricey ventures we all know this, and no doubt you're going to need some external support some time or another, but as a rule of thumb, it's always best to make that some time, another time for as long as possible. Keeping the funding on your own back will insure you reap what you sew. You sell a piece of your soul every time you reach out for eternal forms of financial aid, be it a loan or an investment. Now, if not seeking this support means not going through with the app, then by all means it is time to take that step. But as I said before, put it off as long as possible, pay with your own pocket and try to progress at the rate in which your pocket can afford it, this will also help ensure that you have enough time to evaluate every business related decision you are required to make, and can feel confident that you chose the correct direction with each and every decision of YOUR businesses development.
Well, you have seen the "bootstrap for as long as you can" answers and I'll just affirm that. Get to actual testing and then only ask for dollars when your tests have shown you match what users want.
MOBILE APP
If your app is mobile app , then definitelly I would search for investor. Investor for mobile app could be:
1. Business angel
2. Some mobile app company which may be interested in your app, but mostly they want finished product from my experience.
I have done 3 mobile apps, and definitelly you cannot succeed unless you have large funds for marketing or extreme luck to be reviewed on some major sites. The key is to go viral and basically everyone knows it, so its not easy without money. Just to give you idea how strong competition on mobile apps is, one smaller mobile company (considering what companies are on market) invests 150 000 USD per month for marketing only. So, when you release app, you need large amount of installs and that costs.
Now, if you partner with some mobile app company, you can share revenues with them. Note: they can advertise your app from their apps. However, its not easy to find such company, I think best is personal meeting or telephone contact.
Another approach is to find a partner, a developer who would continue developing your app. Then you would need to share revenues with him also. Certainly, it has to be some experienced coder with few years of experience. So, if you have funds, continue on your own, but dont spend fortune on app, don't make yourself broke after completing app. Some apps can be developed for 3 - 4000$ so its not that costly considering future potential earnings. Chances that you will succeed even if you have great app are small, you will need huge marketing budget or some excellent mobile company who can push your app through their apps (though it does not guarantee anything at all).
DESKTOP APP
However, if you have developed desktop app, in your case I would continue self funding and start selling on my own. You could approach few companies as well after you finish product.
Many try to develop apps and many do, but very few succeed. My advise is that even if someone offer you 50-50% profit sharing its a good deal. 50% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
Good luck in your sales.
My advice: Present to investors but do not accept investment unless they offer such an amazing deal that it would be impossible to say NO.
Reason: The most valuable resource that you have is your time. If you see that investors are ready to vote with the money, you get a confirmation that you are on the right path. Later on you can come back to the same (and other) investors and get money when you actually need them.
Any of the above answers are worth to be taken for granted. The only things to consider in case you have no premoney evaluation are convertible notes to be considered.
Not a direct answer but for this type of question I always recommend entrepreneurs read https://hbr.org/2008/02/the-founders-dilemma
I would suggest a 2 phased approach.
1: submit to a selection of around 50 Beta users, with the provision that with deep insights on its functionality, you offer them incentives for their feedback. This is a time limited event.
With the feedback you engage the appropriate changes, but pay special attention to monetizing the app, and create a payback chart and a rollout timetable.
Layout on paper rhe target market, how you plan on monetizing, and where your income roi will look like.
Armed with this knowledge, then you can release a preview look to potential investors and have real data and income to show for your effort.
I would suggest a small close group of investors, not VC or Sharks at this point.
Focus on getting your income engine purring asap, and you'll have a winner.
I would stay self funded as long as possible. Then move to testing the prototype with customers. If you merge the results from experts and the customers then you have a high chance to presenting to investors and share the data.
Im available to talk more and help in anyway possible.
Do you have any paying customers? If no, then why dont you get some? You could tell them that the app will be out in the next __ weeks and if they sign up now, they can get a lifetime discount of 30%. This way, you will be able to bankroll though your customers and use this money for your development.
In today's environment, even if you approach investors, they will tell you to come back after you have seen some traction.
As far as your development costs are concerned, I suggest you find some good offshore development freelancers. There are very good developers I know who can help you out.
Do let me know if you need any inputs on this.
Vivek
Fund it yourself if you can. Secondly, look to family and friends for a small percentage. However, if you can own it outright and it is a hit, you may be much better off.
Best of Luck,
Mike
From the Trenches to the Towers Marketing
I will be glad to help as my time permits.
Related Questions
-
What is the generally agreed upon "good" DAU/MAU for mobile apps?
You are right that the range is wide. You need to figure what are good values to have for your category. Also, you can focus on the trend (is your DAU/MAU increasing vs decreasing after you make changes) even if benchmarking is tough. Unless your app is adding a huge number of users every day (which can skew DAU/MAU), you can trust the ratio as a good indication of how engaged your users are. For games, DAU/MAU of ~20-30% is considered to be pretty good. For social apps, like a messenger app, a successful one would have a DAU/MAU closer to 50%. In general most apps struggle to get to DAU/MAU of 20% or more. Make sure you have the right definition of who is an active user for your app, and get a good sense of what % of users are actually using your app every day. Happy to discuss what is a good benchmark for your specific app depending on what it does.SG
-
How do you make money to survive while you are building a business? What are some quick ways to make money with less time commitment?
I love this question. If you have to work on the side while building your business, I recommend doing something you absolutely hate. That keeps you hungry to succeed on your own. You'll also typically save your energy for the evenings and weekends where you'll want it for your business. Don't expect to make much money at your "other job" but you can work it to pay the bills while you build your business. This approach also forces you to build incrementally, and it keeps you frugal. This is not necessarily ideal. Having a bunch of money set aside sounds nice and luxurious, but not having the resources puts you in a position where you have to figure it out to survive. I love that. I started my business eight years ago on $150 and today we do a million a year. Don't wait until you have the resources to start safely. Dive in however you can. And avoid shortcuts. Don't waste your time scheming to make bigger money on the side. Do something honest to live on and create a business that drives value.CM
-
What is the best technology for developing a new mobile app from scratch?
There are two sides to that question. One is the mobile app itself and the other is the backend. If I misunderstood in any way and you didn't mean "native" app I apologize in advance. On the backend, there is no clear cut answer to which is the "best". It depends solely on the developers you are able to get. We for example use Node.js , mongoDB, redis, elasticsearch and a couple of proprietary tools in the backend. But you have your pick of the litter now both on the backend api and the datastore with the myriad of options available and touted as the "best" currently on the market. Now on the app side again it solely depends on what you need your mobile app to do. Experiencing first-hand "develop once, run anywhere" I can say it's more like "develop once, debug everywhere" to quote a Java saying. We have tried Phonegap and Titanium Appcelerator and we have switched to native (ObjC and Java) after a couple of months of trying to go the hybrid route. The reasons behind the choice are as follows: - anything that breaks the pattern of how those frameworks NEED to operate is just a huge technical debt that keeps accruing a huge interest. - anything that uses css3 accelerated animations on Android is buggy at best and slow as hell at worst on any lower (< 4.1 I think) versions of Android I hope this gives you some insight. If you need/want to ask me anything feel free to contact me. MihaiMP
-
How much equity should I ask as a CMO in a startup?
Greater risk = greater equity. How likely is this to fail or just break even? If you aren't receiving salary yet are among 4-6 non-founders with equivalent sweat investment, all of whom are lower on the totem pole than the two founders, figure out: 1) Taking into account all likely outcomes, what is the most likely outcome in terms of exit? (ex: $10MM.) Keep in mind that 90%+ of all tech startups fail (Allmand Law study), and of those that succeed 88% of M&A deals are under $100MM. Startups that exit at $1B+ are so rare they are called "unicorns"... so don't count on that, no matter how exciting it feels right now. 2) Figure out what 1% equity would give you in terms of payout for the most likely exit. For example, a $10MM exit would give you $100k for every 1% you own. 3) Decide what the chance is that the startup will fail / go bankrupt / get stuck at a $1MM business with no exit in sight. (According to Allman Law's study, 10% stay in business - and far fewer than that actually exit). 4) Multiply the % chance of success by the likely outcome if successful. Now each 1% of equity is worth $10k. You could get lucky and have it be worth millions, or it could be worth nothing. (With the hypothetical numbers I'm giving here, including the odds, you are working for $10k per 1% equity received if the most likely exit is $10MM and the % chance of failure is 90%.) 5) Come up with a vesting path. Commit to one year, get X equity at the end. If you were salaried, the path would be more like 4 years, but since it's free you deserve instant equity as long as you follow through for a reasonable period of time. 6) Assuming you get agreement in writing from the founders, what amount of $ would you take in exchange for 12 months of free work? Now multiply that by 2 to factor in the fact that the payout would be far down the road, and that there is risk. 7) What percentage share of equity would you need in order to equal that payout on exit? 8) Multiply that number by 2-3x to account for likely dilution over time. 9) If the founders aren't willing to give you that much equity in writing, then it's time to move on! If they are, then decide whether you're willing to take the risk in exchange for potentially big rewards (and of course, potentially empty pockets). It's a fascinating topic with a lot of speculation involved, so if you want to discuss in depth, set up a call with me on Clarity. Hope that helps!RD
-
How has Uber grown so fast?
Obviously, they do the fundamentals well. Good brand. Good experience. Good word of mouth. Good PR. Etc. Etc. But after my interview with Ryan Graves, the head of Global Operations at Uber (https://www.growthhacker.tv/ryan-graves), it became clear that they are operationally advanced and this is a huge part of their success. I'll explain. Uber isn't just a single startup, it's essentially dozens of startups rolled into one because every time they enter a new city they have to establish themselves from essentially nothing (except whatever brand equity has reached the city ahead of them). This means finding/training drivers, marketing to consumers, and building out local staff to manage operations for that city. This is where Ryan Graves comes in. He has a protocol of everything that must be done, and in what order, and by who, to ensure the best chance of success in a new city. So how has Uber grown so fast? Essentially, they figured out how to grow in one locale and were relentless about refining their launch process to recreate that initial success over and over in new cities. No plan works for every city, and they've had to adapt in many situations, but it is still a driving factor for their success.BT
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.