Loading...
Answers
MenuAccountants - what are the benefits of creating an LLC and electing to be taxed as a S-corp?
This question has no further details.
Answers
I am not an accountant, but I do have a good understanding of this concept.
It works like this. If you are self employed there is a slef employment tax on all your income of 15%. This essentially goes toward social security and Medicare.
So let's say you make $100k in profit that means it's $15k in self employment tax.
If you instead become and LLC and file as an S-Corp then self employment tax goes away and is replaced with social security and Medicare on "wages" only. The company then pays you a "reasonable wage" of let's say $30k in this case, and then pays the other $70k out to you as "dividends". The $30k is subject to social security and Medicare which comes to a little under 15% with all things considered (~$4500) and the dividends are not.
This creates a rough tax savings of $10,500.
(Talk to your accountant for exact numbers and advice for your situation, this is just the basic concept.)
Here are some more resources on the subject:
https://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tools/tax-tips/Small-Business-Taxes/How-an-S-Corp-Can-Reduce-Your-Self-Employment-Taxes/INF22938.html
http://www.incorporatecalifornia.com/scorptaxes.html
Hello, my name is Carlos Quintana and I have worked many years in accounting specializing in tax strategies for entities. This question is very common and very simple to answer, however like any other accounting question the answer might varie according to specifics. Furthermore, a very simple benefit to the election of S-corp would be that you do not pay any self employment tax, which can translate to thousands of dollars being saved. A very important benefit for the entity itself (LLC) would be the easiness to maintain it. There is no requirement to maintain record of your annual minutes to maintain for the shareholder and director meetings. Those is my opinion are 2 of the most beneficial things from a LLC with an S-Corp election.
There are a number of advantages and drawbacks to making an S corporation election, however, most of the time it works in the favor of the owner. In situations where an LLC is owned 100% by an individual, the LLC is a disregarded entity for U.S. tax purposes, which means the LLC does not file its own tax return. The income and expense is reported on Schedule C and attached to the individual owners' Form 1040. All of the earnings are subject to federal income taxes as well as self-employment taxes.
If the owner files an S corporation election via Form 2553, the LLC is now a regarded entity for U.S. tax purposes. The LLC files an annual Form 1120-S and the net income (loss) is passed through to the individual owners' Form 1040. Earnings are subject to federal income taxes, but they are not subject to self-employment taxes. If the 100% owner of the S corporation actively participates in the business, the owner will need to pay themselves a reasonable salary, which will be subject to U.S. federal payroll taxes on the wages. Reasonable compensation issues can be complex with S corporations, so it is best to consult a tax professional when setting your salary.
Related Questions
-
I'm a Canadian selling ecommerce products on Amazon (US only). Need info on cross border tax clarification & if it's time to incorporate (in US or CA)
Regarding US taxation of internet sales. Since you are a foreign entity or person (in regard to the US), and there is an income tax treaty between Canada and the US, you will not be liable for US federal income tax on internet sales unless you have a “permanent establishment” in the US with which the internet sales income is effectively connected. So as long as you do not have a warehouse, physical store, sales office, etc... in the US you don't have to file US returns or remit tax to the US. Amazon should be charging to the customer and withholding any sales tax due to a state in which your products are sold. If you sell through other merchants or directly you may have to deal with this yourself. Regarding incorporation Incorporation is almost always a good idea from a liability standpoint as it prevents a judgement for damages from taking all your property and limits the collection to what is owned by the business, With the facts you have given I would suggest incorporating in Canada unless you have a business reason to establish a physical presence in the US. This will eliminate US taxes and related compliance costs. Once you establish a US presence you will need to begin filing returns in the US even if you are running a net operating loss. If there is no benefit to having a physical presence in the US then the related compliance costs and tax would be an unnecessary expense. Feel free to setup a phone call if you would like to chat for a bit regarding the matter. ThanksDM
-
Can I have an Ohio business with a California address?
You can live wherever you want and have a business wherever you want. Especially with an LLC. The IRS doesn't care because with an LLC, the profit flows through the business to it's Members, to the extent of their basis. So if you own 75% and another Member owns 25%, then the profits are distributed that way and reported on the "K-1" with the federal return. LLC's pay no federal income tax as it is al allocated to the Members. The only issue is at the state level wherever you live. If you meet the residency test for that State (which you can find online), then that is where your state taxes - if any - would be calculated and paid based on your K-1 return. You certainly wouldn't want it to appear you have a CA residence with their tax level! I would suggest that you establish residency wherever you live. I too have a virtual mailbox AND live outside of the country. Doesn't affect my LLC in the states at all. Feel free to reach out if you need further help.CD
-
Do companies in the U.S. have to charge a sales tax on digital products, e.g. Info products?
There are a lot of moving parts to this question. First, you need to determine in which states you have "nexus" and then determine do those states require you to charge sales tax, as each state has different rules. As an example, MA requires salesforce.com to charge sales tax to MA customers but does not require newyorktimes.com to charge sales tax. The difference is that users can manipulate data on salesforce.com vs. neworktimes.com is read only. This example can only be applied to MA, Arizona, Illinois, New York, Texas, Pennsylvania and Washington State (as of now). There are also "click-through" and "affiliate" nexus rules that need to be considered. Be careful, as state and local taxation has become a very hot due diligence issue in M&A transactions. So, if you plan to sell your business in the next few years, you want to get this right. Also, the Officers and Directors are personally responsible for uncollected Sales tax. You are best to get an expert to review your sales tax compliance, as it is a very specialized area and changing constantly. I am not an expert, but know of some firms that offer this service at a very reasonable rate. Feel free to call me. Thank you, Joe Faris Accountalent Management Corp. 45 Prospect Street Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel (978) 621-0759 Fax (978) 278-1517 Website: www.accountalent.com LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/farisjoe/ Twitter: @accountalentJF
-
What are the tax consequences for founders if the seed round investors take common stock instead of preferred?
There shouldn't be any tax consequences for the founders if you've made 83b elections--the election meant you paid tax already on the full value of the stock at the time of the election (presumably zero) even though it was subject to future forfeiture. If you sell newly-issued stock there should be no tax impact. If you sell your own common stock, you'd pay tax on the gain, but I doubt that is what you mean here. Of course, you should not take the free advice dispensed on Clarity and consult your own tax preparer--this is not tax advice.BS
-
In a startup with a globally-spread remote team, does it still make sense to incorporate in U.S./Delaware vs. somewhere overseas?
Delaware C-Corp I usually Delaware is the best choice for any startup looking for fundraising with a US focus. However, if you are a remote and global team, an overseas or foreign corporation or US tax purposes might make sense. You'd have to talk to an advisor who can dive into your situation, but it would be more difficult for the US owner come tax time, as he'd likely have to file form 5471 to the IRS for any controlled foreign corporation, and form 90-22.1 for any foreign bank accounts. There are a lot of other concerns I didn't hear you raise that entrepreneurs usually have and ask me about, namely banking and merchant accounts/ payment processors. In terms of accepting online payments, any US corporation or LLC is far and away the best option for a company. It's difficult to suggest without knowing more about the company but you might explore Delaware, Wyoming, Hong Kong and other offshore jurisdictions for your legal entity. Each tend to have positives and negatives and there is no one size fits all solution. I do write about issues of incorporation quite regularly on my website FlagTheory.com - so you can read those articles for free, or we can schedule a call - Clarity.fm/incorporation when you have specific questions. Thank you and hope this was helpful!EJ
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.