Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat are the top 5 books on leadership that have influenced you the most?
This question has no further details.
Answers
Good to Great (Collins)
Getting Naked (Lencioni)
Managing Humans (Lopp)
One Minute Manager (Blanchard)
Crucial Conversations (Patterson)
The Power of Full Engagement (Loehr & Schwartz)
Leadership and Self Deception (Arbinger Institute)
The Go-Giver (Burg and Mann)
Success on Our Own Terms (O'Brien)
Leadership is an Art (DePree)
The number one business book to work through is "Seven Habits of Highly Effective People" by Stephen Covey...It is so basic. Read it over 6-7 months...doing the exercises at the end of each chapter. And if you read it in the past, re-read it. The book is all about how to lead a balanced and successful life.
Leadership captures the essentials of being able and prepared to inspire others. Effective leadership is based upon ideas—both original and borrowed—that are effectively communicated to others in a way that engages them enough to act as the leader wants them to act. A leader inspires others to act while simultaneously directing the way that they act. They must be personable enough for others to follow their orders, and they must have the critical thinking skills to know the best way to use the resources at an organization's disposal. Models of leadership are as follows:
1. Mintzberg’s Management Roles: These roles cover ten tasks and responsibilities that a manager may need to perform, which are divided up into three categories: interpersonal, informational, and decisional. Interpersonal roles include the figurehead, leader, and liaison. Informational roles include the monitor, disseminator, and spokesperson. Decisional roles include the entrepreneur, disturbance handler, resource allocator, and negotiator. Any given manager may be asked to complete a variety of tasks during a given day depending on what comes up and what problems need to be solved.
2. The ‘Dysfunctions of a Team’: This model by Patrick Lencioni’s model addresses some of the common problems within teams. People working together toward a common goal is bound to lead to issues simply because every individual brings slightly different goals, aspirations, skills, and more to the table. While diversity is a team’s greatest strength, these differences can also be the team’s biggest weakness. Simply by understanding that these issues could exist within your team, you will be better prepared to identify and correct them as quickly as possible.
3. Birkinshaw’s Four Dimensions of Management: This model highlights four dimensions that represent key management processes and practices. You can use it to help you to understand how best to manage the type of work you are doing and the values of your organization.
4. Waldroop’s and Butler’s Six Problem Behaviours: This model aims to help managers by identifying six ‘problem behaviours’ along with their traits. When you see any of these six behaviours evolving in members of your team, taking quick action before the behaviour becomes a detriment to the group is the best option.
5. Cog’s Ladder: This model suggests there are five steps necessary for a small group of people to be able to work efficiently together. These stages are the polite stage, the why we’re here stage, the power stage, the cooperation stage, and the esprit stage. It is similar to Tuckman’s Stages, another stage model of groups. Tuckman recognised four stages of team development: “Forming,” “Storming,” “Norming,” and “Performing.”
6. The Leader-Member Exchange Theory: This model looks at how your own personal opinions could limit the opportunities that an individual has to succeed under your leadership. It is not particularly helpful in describing the specific leader behaviours that promote high-quality relationships as it only implies generalities about the need for leaders to show trust, respect, openness, autonomy, and discretion.
7. Belbin’s Team Roles: When looking at any team, it is quickly apparent that each member of the team adopts their own role in order to best contribute and use their skills in a way that is beneficial to the goals of the team as a whole. These roles usually develop naturally over time, depending on the makeup of the team and the specific task at hand. A good manager will observe the team’s occupied roles and step in when necessary to balance out the composition of the group.
8. Benne’s and Sheats’ Group Roles: This model recognises 26 roles that are divided up into one of three categories: task roles, personal roles, and social roles. These role definitions are useful for looking at and evaluating specific behaviours, functions, and needs within a group. and evaluating its current function and needs. They also provide a guide for team member development; the more positive behaviours each person can display, the better able the whole group will be to respond to the demands put on it.
9. The Margerison-McCann Team Management Profile: This is a tool that Organizations can use this tool to help classify their employees regarding what type of team member they are or will be. Using a set of 60 questions, this profile establishes some baseline information about each member of the team so that they can be placed into a specific spot on the Team Management Wheel. The more sections of the wheel that can be filled up by the members of a single team, the more complete that team will be.
10. he Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model: This model states that when job demands are high and job resources/positives are low, then both stress and burnout increase. The effects of high job demands can be offset by increasing the positive aspects of the job. You can achieve this goal by identifying and promoting the job positives that act as a buffer between your team members and the demands of their roles. These actions can include mentoring or coaching, training and development, providing regular constructive feedback, and increasing autonomy.
The books on leadership are as follows which are of course more than five:
1. The Effective Executive by Peter F. Drucker
2. Leadership and Self-Deception by The Arbinger Institute
3. Discipline Equals Freedom by Jocko Willink
4. Do not Shoot the Dog by Karen Pryor
5. Chop wood and Carry water by Joshua Medcalf
6. The Charisma Myth by Olivia Fox Cabane
7. The Dichotomy of Leadership by Jocko Willink
8. What got you here won’t get you there by Marshall Goldsmith
9. High Output Management by Andrew S. Grove
10. The Motive by Patrick Lencinio
11. Leadership is Language by L. David Marquet
12. Leadership Strategy and tactics by Jocko Willink
13. Fostering Grit by Thomas R. Hoerr
14. The new one-minute manager by Ken Blanchard & Spenscer Johnson M.D.
15. The Making of a Manager by Julie Zhuo
Besides if you do have any questions give me a call: https://clarity.fm/joy-brotonath
Related Questions
-
How to deal with co-founders that aren't pulling their weight?
I feel your pain — I've been there several times in a couple of my companies. Each situation ended up being unique, and had to be handled differently. I think there are a few things to consider before you make your decision: -- 1. What is in your cofounder's way? Is you cofounder being held up by a lack of clarity? Lack of motivation? Lack of autonomy? One of my past cofounders was very good at getting the job done, but didn't naturally have the skill to lay out tasks in a manageable way. To get around this, I worked with the whole team (4 people) to write up process documentation that removed the need to "figure out what to do next" that was tripping up this cofounder. -- 2. What job was your cofounder brought on to complete? And is it being completed? One of my companies brought on a cofounder simply to give us a marketing platform — he had a huge online audience — but he did nothing else. At first, this caused tension; once we had specifically laid out who was on the team and for what purpose, it was easier to identify where responsibilities lay. -- 3. Is your cofounder capable of doing the job? One of the more painful ordeals I've gone through in business is bringing on a good friend, then realizing that — despite his talent and intelligence — he just wasn't able to perform the job I'd hired him for. His skills were better suited for a different job: he needs hands-on management; he works better with repetitive tasks that don't require big-picture thinking; he lacks assertiveness and confidence, which were critical for the management-level role he'd been hired to do. After I tried to clear everything in his way, it became clear the company couldn't survive if he remained on the team. I had to lay him off. -- 4. Do you just simply not like the way this cofounder works? In one of my startups, there was a cofounder who I didn't know all that well, but he had amazing industry contacts and domain knowledge. However, once we started working together it became clear that we had VERY different working styles. He drove me completely nuts with (what seemed to me to be) a very ADHD-style of planning, with projects starting and being dropped and then coming out of nowhere with a call at 21:00 to discuss something critical that would be forgotten tomorrow. I'm sure I drove him nuts, too. So eventually we ended up selling that company — it was that or shutter it — because we knew there wasn't a chance we'd be successful if we continued as we were. -- Working with other people is tricky in general. Our instinct is to assume that we're the best workers on the planet and everyone else is incompetent, an idiot, a slacker, or all of the above. Usually it's a combination of an organizational-level lack of clarity, poor communication, no processes, and (sometimes) plain ol' we-don't-see-eye-to-eye-on-things-ness. Hopefully that helps. Feel free to get in touch if you'd like to hear specifics on my situations, or if you'd like any help devising a strategy for resolving your cofounder trouble. Good luck!JL
-
Just wondering how a board advisor is compensated? Is this typically in a form of equity, compensation, or just mentorship?
I've had many "Advisors" over the years and I like to break them up into 2 groups. 1) Formal Advisors These are people who strategic insights into the business and would create value for the company by having them listed on our site, and have access to them in an ongoing way. I typically engage them well before anything formal to see if they would actually be helpful and that we both get along. Compensation is usually around 0.1% - 0.5% ... if the person is amazing and will also help with the fundraising process, then I would go as high as 1%. 2) Personal Advisors These are people who I turn to for specific advice around tactics and strategy on an infrequent basis (maybe once or twice a year). Things like SEO, Internationalization, etc ... I typically try to create value for them every time we chat, so that it's win/win and I don't compensate with equity. I've personally never paid for formal advice, although I do often via Clarity .. but that's different. The great thing about Clarity is I can avoid spending the time or equity to get similar quality advice in usually a faster time period, however both approaches (list above vs. using Clarity) are totally different affinities to the person and the company. Call if you need more.DM
-
Looking for a decent ice breaker for a large 12-16 person working group?
Hey. :) Craft a joke that's relevant to the situation. Touch on the core essence of why everyone is attending, or make light of something that's happening in current news, preferably in a context that relates to your subject matter. As a backup you can alway open with asking people why they're attending and what they're hoping to get out of the workshop. Hope that was helpful.BS
-
From your experience, what are the 'key' rules to building a great team for the long-term?
Your question is very interesting and gives me a feeling you have a real commitment for success because it makes me feel you care for your team. If this question could be fully answered in a couple of lines, you can imagine all managers and executives would lead their teams successfully. The 2 key principles to remember are: 1. Everyone is different: you have to adapt to each individual. It is time consuming but pays off in the long run because everyone has their own learning styles, speed and attitude. Take the time to have 1:1 conversations about them as individuals: likes and dislikes, under what conditions they perform best, how they learn most easily and about their career goals. 2. Create a team spirit. This is the exact opposite of point 1: as much as you recognize everyone as individuals, you have to also build unity and cohesion. There has to be standardized rules of behavior, common values and a shared vision. You have to take time with your team as a whole. This will lead you to create: 1. A personal development plan for each individual in your team, which helps you develop a tailored approach for each person, create reward & recognition systems and monitor people's happiness and performance. This helps you understand your team from a micro-perspective. 2. An organizational development plan for your start-up to give you a more global vision of the talents you need to acquire, retain and grow. This helps you understand your team from a macro-perspective. Team building requires taking time for all the different aspects of bonding: forming, storming, norming, performing, mourning. It's always about balancing two extremes: On one hand you want to take time to work together and alone, to learn & grow, to brainstorm, to create, to plan, to prepare, to research and to measure performance. On the other hand you, you also want to take time away from the office to stop & think, take time to have fun, take time to get to know each other, take time to rest & relax. Do you need any guidance to build individual and organizational development plans that will support growth and team building for your start-up?NK
-
What 'soft' skills have best contributed to your success as an entrepreneur?
Whenever I think of skills, the first one I think of is people skills. I think that is the most important type of skill-set to have. Knowing how to treat and talk to people is beyond important in the workplace. When you know how to talk and treat people, it really doesn't matter what kind of product you are selling. When you make it about the person and not the product, walls fall down. Learning how to read people and get a feel for their personality has really helped too. It's a shame more management teams don't take the time to learn and teach this to their staff. I hope that helps!PC
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.