Loading...
Answers
MenuShall a startup seek funding (services-for-stock deals) directly from service providers, instead of or in addition to seeking cash from VCs?
This question has no further details.
Answers
It depends on the potential for growth of valuation in your business. If 5 years from now, you think you think "moderate" success is most likely (a few million in ARR as a Saas business as just one example), then using your equity to buy services might actually be *worth* it.
But if you're pursuing a fast-growth, VC backed business where you aim to create a 50x return (minimum) on your current valuation, then spending on services with equity is really not advisable, or at the very least, I'd recommend you do it very sparingly.
I would also say that the absolute maximum in a venture backed business that is tolerable for a good cap table would be 8%. Tipping beyond that leads to a messy cap table and lots of small share holders, which you generally want to avoid.
Finally, I'd be sure to get your Service Level Agreements really nailed. Meaning, you want them to commit to a minimum number of hours that equates to the right valuation, and have provisions for these shares to be canceled in the case that you dismiss them before they create full value.
Happy to talk this through in more contextual detail to your business in a call.
In order to answer this successfully, more scope is needed on your business, industry, and services you're seeking to be rendered.
When you look at if from the VC side of things, we're giving you (the founder) cash as a way to "buy" the factors of production that you would need in order to successful pursue your business goals...(along with other valuable advice and guidance)
As a founder, you should be looking at a number of different value perspectives when you attack this situation:
Is the equity your giving up for the services cheaper, or more expansive than the equity you'd give up for the cash to "buy" the services...?
Who would make a better long-term strategic partner? Who compliments your business better when looking at your strategic roadmap for the next five years? Who is more incentivized to take action in helping you along your journey?
Are you going to be opening yourself up to any systemic risks?
At my firm, we actually invest in the business that other startups tend to trade "equity for services" with, as a strategy we employ to help amplify our net capital impact, when syndicating value across our portfolio :)
Related Questions
-
What roles should the CEO and CTO have in a VC meeting?
The more important first impressions to leave a VC with are: 1) That you both are credible and inspire confidence that you can execute the plan you're fundraising on. 2) That there is good chemistry and a great relationship between the two of you; 3) That you can adequately address the concerns/objections/questions the VC raises. The CEO is expected to do most of the talking because the CEO should be the best person in the company at articulating the vision and value of the product and company you're building. If your CTO is comfortable presenting part of the pitch, it would be ideal for the CTO to speak to the product slides. The most important thing is for the CTO not to be a "bump on the log" meaning that you don't want them sitting there for most of the presentation with nothing to say. If you feel that's the case, you really shouldn't bring your CTO. Most VC meetings will not get technical and under the hood. Each question answered should be answered by the person best qualified to speak to that question. You should make eye-contact with your partner and use subtle body language to find a way to cue the other person to speak to that question or simply offer "CTO, would you like to answer that?" Bottom line, make sure that the CTO can speak confidently enough about the product and vision, otherwise -unless specifically asked by the VC - come alone. Fundraising is a big distraction to building and a good VC will always respect that in a first meeting, the CTO can be excused from attending in priority of building product. Happy to talk to you both on a call about helping get you feeling a bit more confident and prepared before your meeting. I was formerly a VC associate for a $500m fund and have raised money from VCs as a serial entrepreneur.TW
-
What's the best visual format to display the size of the market when doing a pitch deck.
I like to take a rule from the Steve jobs playbook and use simple circles... one larger than the other but no more than 2. your most immediate target (realistic reachable) and one of the "enemy" competitor company. or overall untapped market cap. **for this to be effective you must provide as accurate projections as possible** no bar graphs and as little or no text as possible... remember that a deck is a companion to the speaker... avoid bullet points and use the deck to entertain rather than educate... is not a class is a pitch. :)HV
-
What are the best books to learn about Leveraged Buyouts and other creative financing topics?
If you want information that matters in "Creative Financing Techniques" find a person with the experience/insight. Most of what is in books is dated. Many of the more creative methods are a function of current tax code and market factors (like QE).CW
-
What is a good scope of work for a marketing and PR department?
Build a body of work in the form of a blog. Much depends on the size and scope of your company, but branded journalism can really make a huge difference.....AW
-
How do you calculate the value of stock for a start up consulting company for the purpose of stock options?
There are three questions here: - the strike price of the options - the market value of the company - how much those options are actually worth to the recipient 1. The strike price is the price people pay to exchange their options for shares. You can set any strike price you like: it's just a negotiable contract term. However, if the strike price is less than the market value of the shares, the options are taxable (which people tend to avoid), so you typically set the strike price at or above the market value. 2. The market value of the company is how much the company is worth. The celebrity of the founder is clearly a big part of it. If the company were sold, the acquirer would want the founder to lock in as part of the acquisition. So figure out the value a couple of ways: (1) off standard profitability metrics: X times yearly profit and/or revenue vs. comparable companies (2) off the acquisition price: with and without the founder and add the percentage chance the founder would go with it (3) off recent transactions in the stock (what people pay for the stock is a great indicator of value) These will give three different answers: pick some sort of average number, so you can justify your strike price. 3. What the options are worth to the recipient: remember they are only worth something if the recipient can exercise them for stock, and then sell the stock (or receive dividends) for more than the option's strike price. So figure out the probability of the company being sold above the strike price in the next X years, and what an weighted average expected sale price is for the company in the next few years (noting the founder's importance), and that's what the options are worth. I hope that helps.KH
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.