I've been on both sides of this, running hiring panels and, at the moment, sitting in an active search as a candidate, so here's both.
From the hiring side, the honest answer is that "on time" only happens if you design for it:
Pull feedback in the first hour, not at end of day. The scorecard is accurate while it's fresh, and people fill it in before they context-switch back to their real job.
Make the ask small and specific. "Fill out the scorecard" gets ignored. "Thumbs up or down, plus the one concern that would change your mind" gets answered from a phone.
Protect a fixed decision slot. If everyone knows the debrief is Thursday 4pm, feedback lands Thursday 3pm. Open-ended reminders slide forever.
Escalation is real, but it's the last tool, not the first. A stuck hire is a business cost, and a manager who won't release their interviewer's fifteen minutes should hear it framed that way once, cleanly.
From the candidate side, which recruiters tend to underweight: the silence during the gap is what does the damage. A strong candidate reads three days of nothing as disinterest and quietly re-warms their other options. You don't need the decision to keep someone engaged. One line, "the panel's still consolidating, you're very much in it, I'll have something concrete by Friday," costs nothing and stops your best people from drifting. The candidates you lose to slow feedback are almost always the ones with other offers, which is to say the ones you wanted.
So the working version: pull feedback fast, make it tiny to give, protect a fixed decision point, and communicate the process even when you can't yet communicate the outcome.
