Loading...
Answers
MenuHow can a run an effective design critique with a team of designers and stakeholders?
This question has no further details.
Answers
Running an effective design critique is crucial for fostering collaboration, refining ideas, and ensuring that design aligns with project goals. Here are steps and tips for conducting a successful design critique with a team of designers and stakeholders:
1. Define Clear Objectives:
Clearly articulate the goals and objectives of the design critique session. What specific aspects of the design are being reviewed? Is it user experience, visual design, or overall concept? Make these objectives known to participants in advance.
2. Establish a Positive Environment:
Create an atmosphere that encourages constructive criticism and open communication. Emphasize that the goal is to improve the design, not to critique individuals.
3. Include Diverse Perspectives:
Ensure that both designers and stakeholders are present. Each brings a unique perspective – designers offer insights into the creative process, while stakeholders provide business and user context.
4. Prepare Materials in Advance:
Share design materials with the team beforehand, allowing participants to review and formulate their thoughts. This ensures a more thoughtful and productive discussion during the critique.
5. Time Management:
Set a specific time limit for the critique to ensure focus and productivity. Typically, 60-90 minutes is a good range. Stick to the schedule to respect everyone's time.
6. Start with Positives:
Begin the critique on a positive note by highlighting successful aspects of the design. This sets a constructive tone and boosts the team's morale.
7. Encourage Specific Feedback:
Encourage participants to provide specific, actionable feedback. Vague or general comments can be challenging to act upon. Ask questions that prompt detailed insights.
8. Follow the "I Like, I Wish, What If" Structure:
Have participants structure their feedback using the "I Like, I Wish, What If" framework. This format helps balance positive feedback, constructive criticism, and creative suggestions.
9. Facilitate Open Discussions:
As a facilitator, guide the conversation but also allow for open discussions among team members. Encourage designers to explain their design decisions, and stakeholders to share their expectations.
10. Use Visual Aids:
Utilize visual aids, such as annotated screenshots or wireframes, during the critique. This helps in pinpointing specific areas of discussion and ensures everyone is on the same page.
11. Capture Action Items:
Document actionable feedback and the agreed-upon changes. Assign responsibilities and timelines for implementing these changes. This ensures that the critique leads to tangible improvements.
12. Foster a Growth Mindset:
Emphasize that critiques are part of the iterative design process and not a judgment of an individual's skills. Foster a growth mindset where feedback is seen as an opportunity for improvement.
13. Reflect and Iterate:
After the critique, take time to reflect on the process. Gather feedback on the critique itself and look for ways to improve the process for future sessions.
By following these steps, you can facilitate a design critique that not only refines the design but also strengthens collaboration within the team and ensures alignment with stakeholder expectations.
There are a lot of possibilities, but probably the best one is to consider that every product borns with thei aim to satisfy a need, so: does your product reflect a need? If yes, for this "need" you would begin to list all the characteristics should have the product to satisfy it, how? Interviewing people, random people, questioning them about the "need" and how in your opinions it should be satisfied
Run an effective critique through silence. Remember Day 3 of the Design Sprint dubbed "Art Gallery?" With the compositions posted up on Miro or a white board depending on remote or in-person setting, silently allow people to walk around the room and put sticky notes on anonymous designs. Thereafter, have the "decider" pick a couple of "blue ribbon winners." Thereafter, have each team member "present" their piece while answering questions on the post it notes. Finally, vote whether to hybridize or A/B test designs. Hope this helps! Let me know if you've any further questions about facilitation. I'd be happy to help.
Related Questions
-
Specific Tactics to find a co-founder, Do you have what it takes? (ONLY real Startup founders answer please)
Here's what you need to do to recruit any cofounder: 1) Prove or at least instill *high* confidence that you can fund the business or raise the funds required; 2) Demonstrate that you are someone worth following. What have you done previously that clearly shows to others that you have what it takes to succeed? 3) Credibly demonstrate that your idea can create massive success. An idea by itself, no matter how interesting is woefully insufficient. 4) Spend every day making outreach (cold emails, LinkedIn, dribbble, etc) to people, meeting at least 3 a week. You will "kiss many frogs." It's likely you have to meet at least 100 people to find the right person and that assumes you have 1-3. By the way, in order to actually *meet* 100 good people, you'll have to make outbound to at least 400 people. 5) Negotiate equity and compensation (pre and post funding) and ensure written alignment on how decisions are made between the two of you. Cofounder relationships are as intense as marriages. And just like getting married, it requires a lot of dating to build the trust. I'm *totally* unconvinced that two people can find a person they haven't known previously, and become effective cofounders. I think you're better off finding the money to hire someone than actually find a cofounder. The main reason? You probably won't find someone as passionate as you are about what you're building. And keep in mind, I have no idea who you are or what you're building so that's no judgement on you or the idea, just the reality I've observed over 20 years of startups.TW
-
How important is it to have your mobile app's design/branding right --- right from the get-go?
If you're talking about an app-store launch, then it's important to have the core mechanics of the product (from a user interaction perspective) figured out such that the majority of your users are doing the things you want them to do in order to drive continual engagement with the app. Design polish can come later and often slows down whomever is implementing the development of the app. I don't think anything should ever be "ugly" but lacking polish is often the right way to go to get speed to market. That said, to be sure of the core interactions, you want to do as much testing and observing real users use your app prior to launch. Happy to talk through any of this in a call with you.TW
-
What are the pros and cons of building an app versus a responsive website as an MVP?
This is a great question and an important one as well. I would start by identifying: Who is your target market? How will they use your product? On the go? On their laptop or on their mobile device? What kind of technology does your product need? Can it be built as a simple website or does in need to be an app (i.e. you need push notifications, integration with other mobile apps, etc). On the other hand, how much time and budget do you have? Typically a responsive website is faster and cheaper to build than an app and will get you out the door faster.AM
-
How should I go about sourcing for a packaging company or finding a company with competitive prices?
Shipping components are expensive and unless you have the volume to buy in quantity vs small bundles is when you'll be able to shop around for a better deal. For example, Uline offers packaging in bundles of 8 or 25 as their minimum, this is stock item for which they order several thousands units of to keep the cost down. For you it fits because you can buy in small amounts at a time. However, if you have a need for 1000 at least or more units then buying from Uline is really expensive compared to what you could buy them for. Uline is a major distributor with a 45-50% markup on their items (give or take) as they have large warehousing and infrastructures. If you are ready to move to the next level, first find the correct material name for each packaging component, and look for suppliers of that particular item. Search websites likehttp://www.thomasnet.com/ for suppliers. Or go through a packaging broker instead of a distributor, like Landsberg Orora, or Ernest Packaging, and they can do all the leg work for you and still save money. Additionally, I know your drawing is not to scale, but there seems to be excess empty air space, if that is true then you can customize your packaging per exactly your needs, which will help to further bring the cost down. An engineer should take a look at your current situation because there is more at play than just shipping components - method of shipping, weight, weather condition, materials thickness etc all play a roll and can all contribute to cost saving while making the whole thing function better. This question is common enough that I've written tutorials on it http://howtobuypackaging.com/how-to-buy-packaging-part-1-determining-your-packaging-needs/.SG
-
How do you get a product prototype developed in China sitting in the US?
It varies and it's very very specific to what you want to develop. The concrete design of your circuit matters. Also prototype building costs are usually a factor 10-100 higher than series. If you already have your prototype then you can shop around various manufacturing companies. To do that, you need Gerber files (your PCB design) and a bill of materials. You also need to think about casing: designing it and creating the mold is expensive. If you don't have your prototype yet, I recommend having it engineered in eastern Europe. Custom engineering is cheap there and high quality. IP protection is a problem. One thing to do is to distribute the work to different manufacturers. For the design phase you are safer if you design your prototype in Europe or the US where international patent laws apply. I could give you more specific advise in a phone call, getting to know a bit better what you are trying to build.GF
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.