Loading...
Answers
MenuHow do I get funding for my startup?
This question has no further details.
Answers
There are a lot of different platforms to try and raise capital. You can try and borrow money from a traditional bank, or if you are in the US, the small business administration (SBA) has many programs to loan funds to small businesses.
Other startups try to raise money by issuing debt or equity to investors. Crowdfunding has also become a popular method of raising funds. The crowdfunding platform generally entails people "gifting" you money to fund your company, so any proceeds are generally treated as taxable income.
Unless you have invoices to factor along with forthcoming contracts that are signed and work that can be related on it is in ones best interest to take rejection as a gift. If we apply for a SMall Business loan and are are denied, that is a comforting indication that it's not the time to spend money we don't have.
A payroll line of credit or periodic contractual draws against work performed is the best way to make ends meet while not putting your entity in harm's way.
There are countless sub- prime financing companies with preditory lending practices thtat look and smell like an award winning BBQ whrn mere growing pains are expected and should be embraced. Like growing up as a child it is suppose to hurt. Embrace and grow from it, I ask to not run from it. It will make is stronger and in the future decisions will reflect experience and not umbrella seeking habits. that loan as a wolf in sheep's clothing and often what was once your start - up may soon appear to be the banks start+up. If however you have already made up your mind, and feel the need to out a bandaid on a potential bleeding wound, there are ad I mentioned lenders, , private and hard money lenders that will loan for most anything.with promise of a minimum payment like a maxed out credit card. Please be careful. I made these mistakes and lost a company because Inwas too prideful to ask for help as I felt I knew everything and Inwas wrong. Just because I failed doesn't mean that you will , please be careful.
During contract negotiations the best source of lending is your own money. Baby steps. There are those who lack and those who thrive. Having a business license does not make us business People. Often it equates to a hopeful consumer, with a business license and I have been there too. You can work through these stages of growth without turning your assets into liabilities. That is what start -up capital often equates to. Tht said, if you must please use cried finding and hire a grant writer to write your campaign. This will be the best 500USD you ever spent. Then you have funds that need not be paid back with an impossible interest rate. It takes two years before an entity can stand alone and build credit. . Just be careful to not create a permanent problem to protect yourself from what is often a temporary challenge.. please forgive umy typos and read between the lines...
How to get funding for a startup depends heavily on your goals for the company, where the company is at, whether it is a business with early cash flow or something that will need to scale in order to start driving revenues. If you have friends and family with money, that is the easiest place to start. It's also a good way to gauge your pitch and ability to get people excited because if you can't get your former rich boss who likes you to invest, you're going to have a hell of a time getting a stranger to.
Most startup founders start to think about fundraising far too early. These days, unless you have a tremendous professional background and an idea that is in your area of expertise, most investors will want to see a working product with customers/traction before they will write a check. Fundraising too early can be a tremendous waste of time and can burn your contacts if they think you are delusional about where the company is at and whether it is investable.
You can look into government grants, pitch competitions and other sources of revenue. You can also try to find paying customers whose need for your service is so bad that they would be willing to pay to help you develop it.
There are too many variables on this to provide a concise answer. Feel free to schedule a call with me if you want to provide more details and get better feedback.
I did work in several startup companies in India and my job was to look out for funding avenues Funding is something a startup rarely gets without a sure-footing in the business markets around the world. With pandemic around, getting funding is very difficult. The pandemic had crashed several economies and business around the globe is struggling to survive. To get a proper funding for your startup; in whichever field it is, you must stand out of the rest in the market. This is the best market strategy in the given scenario, or at any given scenario. Let me discuss an example with you. Pollution is a widespread problem across the world. To tackle this problem Hyundai came up with an SUV called Nexo. Well this is nothing new if we look it deeply, Toyota had done it too with it's Toyota Mirai. Nexo works on the concept of fuel cell which contains hydrogen in it. When this hydrogen reacts with oxygen from the air it creates electricity, heat and water. There is no combustion and no emission and the only byproduct is water which is so pure that you can take a sip whenever you want. So, imagine you were an investor with billions in your pockets you would surely like to invest in Hyundai because they are market disruptors and have changed the way people look at cars not as pollution makers but environment friendly. Customers love the car because it makes them feel like rebels with a cause. Suppliers love the car because it makes them look smart, while the investors love them because the car makes them feel that they are investing in tomorrow's big player.
In HBR Article titled, 'Disruptive Startups Get Funding More Easily, but Less of It' by Timo Van Balen, Murat Tarakci and Ashish Sood a study was made on 918 Israeli startups seeking first round of funding keeping in mind the market disruptor factor and it was found that a venture's disruptive vision increased by 22% but amounts it raised fell by 24%. The reason that was stated is that investors do not want to put their eggs into one basket due to market risks and uncertainties.
So, the answer to your question is be disruptive as much as you can, try to ride upon the tides of time and you will get a lot of funding and investment.
There are multiple factors that have to be considered whilst one is looking for start-up seed funding. These encompass, however, are not limited to:
Scope with problem/market opportunity you are attempting to clear up.
Team length & composition (very imp)
The country where the task is based totally
Whether the challenge is tech, non-tech, social, and so on
Are your product (at least MVP) and/or service is prepared
Whether or not you have got large consumer boom/signups (for cell, internet apps) or patron signups (paid, loose, freemium, and so forth)
Zone particular trouble (e. G. Long damage even for training related ventures in India etc).
Retaining this kind of & greater factors in mine, right here are my insights on start-up seed investment:
During the last 6-7 years as an Indian entrepreneur, I've observed that buyers fund startups in the majority of the cases when all 4 of them beneath mentioned matters are in the region:
1. MVP ready- geared up app / portal / platform / prototype etc.
2. Product marketplace suit- already paying clients for solving a massive pain point or offering a large comfort.
3. Traction in the area – qtr on qtr excessive increase in customers, clients, sales at least for min 6 months & preferably 12-24 months. 4. Geared up group- single founders/spouse groups and many others. Are rarely funded by VCs. Your team needs to be in the vicinity earlier than you method VCs.
I've successfully helped over 150 entrepreneurs, startups, and businesses, and I would be happy to help you. Please send me more information before scheduling a call - so I can give you maximum value for your money. Take a look at the great reviews I’ve received: https://clarity.fm/ripul.chhabra
Most of the answers posted will cover this topic well but I have some other non traditional ideas to share and would be glad to help you
Related Questions
-
How much equity should I ask as a C-level executive in a new startup ?
As you may suspect, there really isn't a hard and fast answer. You can review averages to see that a CEO typically becomes a major shareholder in a startup, but your role and renumeration will be based on the perceived value you bring to the organization. You value someone's contribution through equity when you think that they will be able to add long-term benefits, you would prefer that they don't move company part way through the process, and to keep them from being enticed by a better salary (a reason for equity tied to a vesting arrangement). Another reason is when the company doesn't have salary money available but the potential is very strong. In this situation you should be especially diligent in your analysis because you will realize that even the best laid plans sometimes fall completely short. So to get the best mix, you have to be very real about the company's long-term growth potential, your role in achieving it, and the current liquidity necessary to run the operations. It should also be realized that equity needs to be distributed. You cannot distribute 110% and having your cap table recalculated such that your 5% turns into 1% in order to make room for the newly hired head of technology is rather demotivating for the team. Equity should be used to entice a valuable person to join, stay, and contribute. It should not be used in leu of salary that allows an employee to pay their bills. So, like a lot of questions, the answer is really, it depends. Analyzing the true picture of your long-term potential will allow you to more easily determine the correct mix.DH
-
VCs: What are some pitch deck pet peeves?
Avoid buzzwords: - every founder thinks their idea is disruptive/revolutionary - every founder says their financial projections are conservative Instead: - explain your validation & customer traction - explain the assumptions underlying your projections Avoid: - focusing extensively on the product/technology rather than on the business - misunderstanding the purpose of financial projections; they exist in a pitch deck to: a) validate the founders understanding of running a business b) provide a sense of magnitude of the opportunity versus the amount of capital requested c) confirm the go-to-market strategy (nothing undermines a pitch faster than financial projections disconnected from the declared go-to-market approach) d) generally discredit you as someone who understands how to build a company; for instance we'll capture 10% of our market, 1% of China, etc. Top down financial projections get big laughs from investors after you leave the room. bonus) don't show 90% profit margins. Ever. Even if you'll actually have them. Ever. Instead: - avoid false precision by rounding all projections to nearest thousands ($000) - include # units / # subscribers / # customers above revenue line; this goes hand-in-hand with building a bottom up revenue model and implicitly reveals assumptions. Investors will determine if you are realistic, conservative, or out of your mind based largely on the customer acquisition numbers and your explanation of how they will be achieved. - highlight your assumptions & milestones on first customers, cash flow break even, and other customer acquisition and expense metrics that are relevant Avoid: - thinking about investor money as your money - approaching the pitch from your mindset (I need money); investors have to be skeptics, so understand their perspective. - bad investors; it's tempting to think that any money is good money. You can't get an investor to leave once they are in without Herculean efforts and costs (and if you're asking for money, you can't afford it). If you're not on the same page with an investor on how to run/grow the business, you'll regret every waking hour. Instead: - it's their money; tell them how you are going to utilize their money to make them more money - you're a founder, a true believer. Your mantra should be "de-risk, de-risk, de-risk". Perception of risk is the #1 reason an investor says no. Many are legitimate, but often enough it's simply a perception that could have been addressed. - beyond the pitch, make the conversation 2-way. Ask questions of the investor (you might learn awesome things or uncover problems) and talk to at least two other founders they invested in more than 6 months ago.JP
-
For every success story in Silicon Valley, how many are there that fail?
It all depends on what one decides to be a definition of a "success story." For some entrepreneurs, it might be getting acqui-hired, for some -- a $10M exit, for some -- a $200M exit, and for others -- an IPO. Based on the numbers I have anecdotally heard in conversations over the last decade or so, VCs fund about 1 in 350 ventures they see, and of all of these funded ventures, only about 1 in 10 become really successful (i.e. have a big exit or a successful IPO.) So you are looking at a 1 in 3500 chance of eventual venture success among all of the companies that try to get VC funding. (To put this number in perspective, US VCs invest in about 3000-3500 companies every year.) In addition, there might be a few others (say, maybe another 1-2 in every 10 companies that get VC investments) that get "decent" exits along the way, and hence could be categorized as somewhat successful depending on, again, how one chooses to define what qualifies as a "success story." Finally, there might also be companies that may never need or get around to seeking VC funding. One can, of course, find holes in the simplifying assumptions I have made here, but it doesn't really matter if that number instead is 1 in 1000 or 1 in 10000. The basic point being made here is just that the odds are heavily stacked against new ventures being successful. But that's also one of the distinguishing characteristics of entrepreneurs -- to go ahead and try to bring their idea to life despite the heavy odds. Sources of some of the numbers: http://www.nvca.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ven... https://www.pwcmoneytree.com/MTP... http://paulgraham.com/future.html Here are others' calculations of the odds that lead to a similar conclusion: 1.Dear Entrepreneurs: Here's How Bad Your Odds Of Success Are http://www.businessinsider.com/startup-odds-of-success-2013-5 2.Why 99.997% Of Entrepreneurs May Want To Postpone Or Avoid VC -- Even If You Can Get It http://www.forbes.com/sites/dileeprao/2013/07/29/why-99-997-of-entrepreneurs-may-want-to-postpone-or-avoid-vc-even-if-you-can-get-it/MB
-
What is a better title for a startup head....Founder or CEO? Are there any pros/cons to certain titles?
The previous answers given here are great, but I've copied a trick from legendary investor Monish Pabrai that I've used in previous startups that seems to work wonders -- especially if your company does direct B2B sales. Many Founders/ CEOs are hung up on having the Founder/ CEO/ President title. As others have mentioned, those titles have become somewhat devalued in today's world -- especially if you are in a sales meeting with a large organization. Many purchasing agents at large organizations are bombarded by Founders/ CEOs/ Presidents visiting them all day. This conveys the image that a) your company is relatively small (the CEO of GM never personally sells you a car) and b) you are probably the most knowledgeable person in the organization about your product, but once you land the account the client company will mostly be dealing with newly hired second level staff. Monish recommends that Founder/ CEOs hand out a business card that has the title "Head of Sales" or "VP of Sales". By working in the Head of Sales role, and by your ability to speak knowledgeably about the product, you will convey the message that a) every person in the organization is very knowledgeable about the ins and outs of the product (even the sales guys) and b) you will personally be available to answer the client's questions over the long run. I've used this effectively many times myself.VR
-
How do I hire a good Copywriter?
Kudos to you for seeing the value in great copy. I love that you mentioned 37signals, which is an organization that's made copywriting part of almost everyone's jobs (or so they've shared on their blog). MailChimp and Zendesk are two others that people often point to re: great copy that builds a brand and differentiates; Groupon is another awesome example of really, really tonal copy that people actually read (which is more than half the battle). MailChimp has in-house copywriters, including Kate Kiefer (https://twitter.com/katekiefer), and so does Groupon. I'm not sure who writes for Dropbox or Zendesk, though searching companies on LinkedIn can often reveal little-known in-house geniuses. The startups you mention have a certain style and tone that I have to say is different from what you'll normally get with a "direct response" copywriter, though by all means check out the link David Berman submitted to you because you never know. I recommend that, to achieve the slightly funky, funny-ish copy you're looking for, you seek out a conversion-focused copywriter with a creative and UX background. You need someone who's totally at ease adopting a new voice / tone and using it appropriately across your site and in your emails; less experienced copywriters might be heavy-handed with the tone, which often gets in the way of the user experience (e.g., button copy that's tonal can lead to confusion). Be careful, of course, not to push your writer to be exceptionally creative -- because a little touch of tone goes a loooong way for busy, scanning eyes. Here are some great freelance copywriters you could consider: http://copyhackers.com/freelance-copywriters-for-hire/ The link to Neville's Kopywriting peeps is also great. Before hiring, ask to see a portfolio or get a) links to websites they've written and b) a zip of emails they've written; if a writer is accepting clients, they'll usually showcase their work on their website. Check out their blog and tweets to see if their voice comes through in their own writing. Don't hire bloggers or content creators for a job a copywriter should do. Don't hire print copywriters for web work unless they do both. And when you find a great copywriter, trust them... and don't let them go - because 10 bucks says, they're in demand or about to be.JW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.