Loading...
Answers
MenuHow do you monetise an audience you have grown?
Answers
What you've already done is a great first step. Here are two additional ways you can improve conversion:
A)
Right now you have two options
- Free
- $ + pro features
To get more people to select option two, you can add a third option. This third option is a 'dummy option', you won't be expecting many or any people to actually choose it. It's just there to make use of a known way in which the human brain makes decisions. The third option should cost more than [option 2], maybe 1.5X the cost. The third option should be [option 2]+anything you can think of that could possibly add any amount of value. For instance, maybe it's access to a special "pro-user FAQ", I don't know exactly what your services are so you'll obviously know better. When this third option is present users will see the middle option [option 2] as a good deal, or at least a better deal than they had previously seen it as. This will lead to higher conversion.
B)
This method is pretty commonly known and used, but maybe you haven't implemented it yet.
Studies have repeatedly shown that the human mind is more inclined to fear loss than to the seek gain.
So make the pro version of all your services available for free for one month. This will accomplish two things.
- Once they have signed up for free, they will have a lower likelihood of canceling than the initial likelihood of them signing up.
- In this process you will be collecting a ton of data on what your users want / don't want.
Only notify existing users about this free offer through email (do not advertise it on the site), and mention in the email that it's because they've already given you something, and they're already committed to you to some extent ("we love how you have been using our products", or "because you've such a great user for such a long time").
To use the pro version users will have to give you credit info, and start billing them if they don't cancel within a month. Make sure that if they cancel you have a question about why they are canceling. It may be because 1) they don't want to pay that much, 2) you're missing things that people want ("I wish you had this feature"), or 3) you have some things that people don't want ("there's a bug when I do this"). If it's #1, then you can start advertising to a new user base, or make your prices cheaper, and if it's #2 or #3 you can have your devs fix things.
_Only_ notify the users that are not currently paid subscribers (if send the email to paid subscribers too they will be pissed that they aren't getting a free month too). Still though, there is a danger that your existing paid customers might find out. So to avoid potentially pissing them off, you can send each of them and email offer to use a service that they are not currently paying for free for a month.
C)
If you want to go more in depth into these methods and additional methods we can talk about it,
Some thoughts...
- Free users are more like followers than paid users. Need to learn what paid users want. It is a very important distinction.
- When you say you chose best performing freebies, is that defined from use, your perspective, customer discovery???
- What pain are you solving with the free?
- What pain you solving with the premium version?
- Have you created a vitamin or a pain killer?
Let me know if you want to learn how to do great customer discovery and scale.
Hello,
I see the attention here is a lot on the product but, in order to maximize the conversion rate you need 3 things:
- a good product
- a good marketing and engagment strategy
- a GREAT sales team and pricing policies.
I developed many products and built several sales teams and the relationships between who creates the product and who sells it (sales or marketing) is really important. If you wish, I can give you a piece of advice on the matter!
Best,
Marco
Related Questions
-
How can I become an idea person, as a professional title?
One word: Royalties This means you generate the idea and develop it enough to look interesting to a larger company who would be willing to pay you a royalty for your idea. This happens all the time. Rock stars, authors and scientists routinely license their creative ideas to other companies who pay them a royalty. Anyone can do it. Your business, therefore, would be a think tank. You (and your team, if you have one) would consider the world's problems, see what kinds of companies are trying to solve those problems, and then develop compelling solutions that they can license from you. You have to be able to sell your idea and develop a nice presentation, a little market research and an understanding of basic trademark and patent law. The nice thing about doing this is that if you develop enough cool ideas you will have royalties coming in from a lot of different sources, this creates a stable, passive revenue stream that requires little or no work to maintain. Start in your spare time and plan on the process taking 3-5 years. Set a goal to have a few products in the market that provide enough revenue (royalties) to cover your basic living expenses. Then you can quit your day job and dedicate more time and increase the momentum. A good idea business should have dozens, if not hundreds of license contracts generating royalties. It's possible to pull this off. And it is a fun job (I'm speaking from experience).MM
-
What tools to use for mobile Prototyping ?
My 2 favourite are: - www.uxpin.com - www.flinto.com Flinto is by far my favorite for mobile. I also us www.balsamiq.com for anything wireframe. Sometimes I jump into Sketch http://www.bohemiancoding.com/sketch/ for more high fidelity mockups using their Mirror feature http://www.bohemiancoding.com/sketch/mirror/ Hope that helps. P.S. There's a tonne of Mobile UX experts on Clarity, many $1/min - call them, you'll learn so much. my2cents.DM
-
What does it mean to 'grandfather you in' in the tech world?
It stands for allowing someone to continue doing or use something that is normally no longer permitted (due to changing regulations, internal rules etc.)OO
-
What is the average series A funding round at pre revenue valuation for a enterprise start up w/cutting edge tech on verge of our first client.
With all respect to Dan, I'm not seeing anything like that. You said "pre-revenue." If it's pre-revenue and enterprise, you don't have anything proven yet. You would have to have an insanely interesting story with a group of founders and execs on board with ridiculous competitive advantage built in. I have seen a few of those companies. It's more like $3m-$5m pre. Now, post-revenue is different. I've seen enterprise plays with $500k-$1m revenue/yr, still very early (because in the enterprise space that's not a lot of customers yet), getting $8m-$15m post in an A-round. I do agree there's no "average." Finally, you will hit the Series A Crunch issue, which is that for every company like yours with "cutting edge tech" as-yet-unproven, there's 10 which also have cutting edge tech except they have customers, revenue, etc.. So in this case, it's not a matter of valuation, but a matter of getting funded at all!JC
-
For every success story in Silicon Valley, how many are there that fail?
It all depends on what one decides to be a definition of a "success story." For some entrepreneurs, it might be getting acqui-hired, for some -- a $10M exit, for some -- a $200M exit, and for others -- an IPO. Based on the numbers I have anecdotally heard in conversations over the last decade or so, VCs fund about 1 in 350 ventures they see, and of all of these funded ventures, only about 1 in 10 become really successful (i.e. have a big exit or a successful IPO.) So you are looking at a 1 in 3500 chance of eventual venture success among all of the companies that try to get VC funding. (To put this number in perspective, US VCs invest in about 3000-3500 companies every year.) In addition, there might be a few others (say, maybe another 1-2 in every 10 companies that get VC investments) that get "decent" exits along the way, and hence could be categorized as somewhat successful depending on, again, how one chooses to define what qualifies as a "success story." Finally, there might also be companies that may never need or get around to seeking VC funding. One can, of course, find holes in the simplifying assumptions I have made here, but it doesn't really matter if that number instead is 1 in 1000 or 1 in 10000. The basic point being made here is just that the odds are heavily stacked against new ventures being successful. But that's also one of the distinguishing characteristics of entrepreneurs -- to go ahead and try to bring their idea to life despite the heavy odds. Sources of some of the numbers: http://www.nvca.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ven... https://www.pwcmoneytree.com/MTP... http://paulgraham.com/future.html Here are others' calculations of the odds that lead to a similar conclusion: 1.Dear Entrepreneurs: Here's How Bad Your Odds Of Success Are http://www.businessinsider.com/startup-odds-of-success-2013-5 2.Why 99.997% Of Entrepreneurs May Want To Postpone Or Avoid VC -- Even If You Can Get It http://www.forbes.com/sites/dileeprao/2013/07/29/why-99-997-of-entrepreneurs-may-want-to-postpone-or-avoid-vc-even-if-you-can-get-it/MB
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.