Loading...
Answers
MenuIs it harmful for a job seeker to have an entrepreneurial background or be interested in being one?
Is it harmful to your CV if you state you have been an entrepreneur or are interested in being one, and then look for a job with someone?
Would employers not like it if you have been the founder of a company before? and you need a job because the company may have not done well.
Answers
This is a really good question and one I ask myself all the time. I also am an entrepreneur and have owned my own businesses off and on for the past 15+ years. During the times that I was looking for work, I also found myself pigeon holed because I was not the "cookie cutter" Enterprise Account Exec for Salesforce then Oracle, etc. It seemed to me that it became a detriment as potential employers see you as a flight risk. I would steer away from being overly entrepreneurial. HOWEVER, with that being said, I wear the entrepreneur title as a badge of honor. I am battle tested, been in the trenches, worked for no money at length and can walk the walk. At the end of the day it is a monetary decision. Good Luck!
The "it depends" insight you've already received in other responses here is only part of the correct answer. The full answer is "it depends whether entrepreneurship is relevant to the prospective employer."
Your CV is not really about you... it's about your prospective employer and the skills and experience you bring to them which make you uniquely qualified for a job. I've reviewed thousands and thousands of résumés and I've hired entrepreneurs galore. What mattered was the skills and experience they brought to my company, not so much where they worked.
Don't include information on your résumé which is not related to the job posting or which does not explain exactly why you're a great candidate for the job. For instance, an interest in being an entrepreneur is not relevant. What may be relevant is citing examples of how you've demonstrated an "entrepreneurial approach" if, for instance, the job posting calls for someone who can take initiative to drive new business, develop new relationships or grow an aspect of a company's business.
You may want to explain in your cover letter why you're interested in transitioning from self-employment to a role as an employee or contractor. This will help put a recruiter at ease that you're not a "flight risk" when the first opportunity arises for you to start your own business.
I'm happy to answer any additional questions you may have.
Most of the time the answer is yes it is harmful. Harmful because people who are entrepreneurs do not make good employees.
Entrepreneurs think differently than traditional employees. People who are entrepreneurs are the rock in their employers boot because they are always questioning "why" and "can't this be done better" . I am a business owner and once you are your own boss, working for someone else is very difficult. Most employers view it this way too. Most employers are going to assume and fear that you will be an extreme know-it-all pain in the ass.
You might want to say you worked FOR your company-leave it unsaid that you were the owner.
I would concur with Josh and yet add the dreaded "it depends".
Does it hurt to have been an entrepreneur?
Only if that is how you define yourself.
I'd love to talk with you about how you can define yourself by your abilities and passion, telling a story of grit that includes trying and failing. Sell the startup failure as boldness and it can actually help, because even big companies like the 'startup mindset'.
Let's chat about constructing this narrative and am sure you will actually learn something new about yourself!
Josh's answer was on the money.
In my experience "it depends" on who your target is.
In life there are always two kinds of people, whatever you are doing, and they will have these reactions:
> they will like who you are / what you're doing
or
> they won't like who you are / what you're doing.
What you've done is illuminated the failure of what I call "outdated job hunting technology." The resume and cover letter are really poor methods of looking for work.
But let's say you continue to use them.
WHO are you sending your CV to?
Whose eyes is it getting in front of?
If it's top executives, then I think you have a chance.
Yes, the format is still detrimentally old school, and we could do a lot better in that department, but at least the right kind of person is reading what you have to say.
But if it's stodgy, rules-bound HR departments, scared of making a bad decision (and their own shadow)...you probably won't pass the safety test.
Without any help, you can dramatically improve your odds by only applying to roles where you know the recipients of your information will be top executives.
They're the only people who can change the plan. Reallocate resources. Hire who they want, regardless of "the rules."
I have a Kindle book on unorthodox job hunting methods that work and radio interviews about them I'd be happy to provide. I'd post the Dropbox link here but am not sure that would be OK. (Mods, if it is, let me know and I'll do that.) In the meantime, I'll be happy to share them with anyone who messages me.
This could go one of two ways. I've had some employers hire me because of Entrepreneurial things I've done and mentioned on my resume and CV, and I've had other potential employers who either felt threatened by it or thought I wouldn't be committed to their business and would run off and start my own thing.
I think at startups and/or smaller businesses where positions tend to be less structured it's viewed as an asset that you can be a jack of all trades, your comfortable working in a fast paced and changing environment, in a more corporate atmosphere where they want you to do your job and only one specific duty it may not be seen as an asset.
You could potential tailor your CV to include or leave off the Entreprenurial stuff depending on whom you're applying with.
I thought Mary above had an interesting approach, mentioning you worked for the company and leaving off that you were the owner depending upon the position and company you're applying with.
Related Questions
-
How was SnapChat able to grow so quickly?
I'm answering your question assuming that you hope to be able to replicate it's own success in your own mobile app. There are a couple of factors responsible for it's growth that are instructive to anyone building a mobile app. "Leveraging the intimacy and privacy of the mobile phone." We now have an *intimate* relationship with our phone like no other device in the history of technology. Every internet company that started before around 2010 has built their core interactions around "the old web" one which was accessed primarily via a browser on a computer. Companies that start with a clean slate, should be building their interactions around how to do whatever the app is supposed to do while leveraging what is unique to people's relationship to their mobile devices. Photo-sharing has become a core part of the way we communicate now. Snapchat built something that provided an experience that leveraged the feeling of privacy and intimacy that is unique to mobile. "Provided an escape from the "maturity" of other online services." Too many parents, aunts, uncles and other "old people" have encroached into the social networks of teens and young people. As a result, they've had a desire to find places to express themselves in places inaccessible by older generations. An important distinction is that it's not just parents and relatives that young people are trying to avoid, but also employers & colleges who are increasingly using "mature" social networks to review applicants. "Leveraged PR even bad PR" The fact that the app got so much press about it being used to sext was perfect PR for the company, as it essentially reinforced the brand experience that it has today. Essentially, "if it's safe enough to send a sext, it's safe for any kind of communication I want to have." And although the safety and security of Snapchat is actually not as advertised, it still enjoys the reputation of having less impact than any primarily web-based service. Building a successful mobile application is one of the hardest challenges to face designers, programmers and entrepreneurs in the history of writing software. Happy to talk to you if you're considering building a mobile app, about what I've learned about the "table stakes" for success.TW
-
What advice do you give to a 16 year old entrepreneur with a start up idea?
First, hat tip to you for being a young entrepreneur. Keep it up! If you have the funds to build out your MVP, hire a developer and possibly a mentor. If your idea is marketable, you don't need to give up equity by bringing in a co-founder. If this is your entrepreneurial venture, I would recommend you do retain a coach to help you see all the things you may not know. Have you already done your SWOT analysis? Have you identified your target market? What is your marketing plan? What will be your operating expenses? There are lots of questions to ask. If you would a free call, I'd be happy to help you in more detail. Just use this link to schedule your free call... https://clarity.fm/kevinmccarthy/FreeConsult Best regards, Kevin McCarthy Www.kevinmccarthy.comKM
-
My startup just failed. What could I start to "immediately" generate $1,000/mo?
The quickest path to cash is almost always consulting. Be very specific about what it is you can offer. Don't just offer "business consulting". Find a niche and serve it. Reach out to your network, including friends and family and ask if they need or know of anyone who might want to hear about what your consulting has to offer. That will be way faster than trying to go at it from scratch or cold calling. If you call 100 people in your network this week, you will have a consulting gig within 3 weeks. Good luck, and let me know if you'd like advice on entering a digital marketing/lead generation consulting niche. I've grown from zero to $8,000 of monthly recurring payments in the last 40 days! DaveDR
-
If I have a business idea for a large company, how can I give it to them and mutually profit, without them just taking the idea and squashing me?
Probably not the answer you're looking for, but companies have so many unimplemented ideas that the likelihood of partnering to implement someone else's idea is really low. And besides which, the idea is not something that has much value in and of itself. If you're passionate in the idea, build it yourself. That's the only way you can have leverage.TW
-
How much equity should I ask as a CMO in a startup?
Greater risk = greater equity. How likely is this to fail or just break even? If you aren't receiving salary yet are among 4-6 non-founders with equivalent sweat investment, all of whom are lower on the totem pole than the two founders, figure out: 1) Taking into account all likely outcomes, what is the most likely outcome in terms of exit? (ex: $10MM.) Keep in mind that 90%+ of all tech startups fail (Allmand Law study), and of those that succeed 88% of M&A deals are under $100MM. Startups that exit at $1B+ are so rare they are called "unicorns"... so don't count on that, no matter how exciting it feels right now. 2) Figure out what 1% equity would give you in terms of payout for the most likely exit. For example, a $10MM exit would give you $100k for every 1% you own. 3) Decide what the chance is that the startup will fail / go bankrupt / get stuck at a $1MM business with no exit in sight. (According to Allman Law's study, 10% stay in business - and far fewer than that actually exit). 4) Multiply the % chance of success by the likely outcome if successful. Now each 1% of equity is worth $10k. You could get lucky and have it be worth millions, or it could be worth nothing. (With the hypothetical numbers I'm giving here, including the odds, you are working for $10k per 1% equity received if the most likely exit is $10MM and the % chance of failure is 90%.) 5) Come up with a vesting path. Commit to one year, get X equity at the end. If you were salaried, the path would be more like 4 years, but since it's free you deserve instant equity as long as you follow through for a reasonable period of time. 6) Assuming you get agreement in writing from the founders, what amount of $ would you take in exchange for 12 months of free work? Now multiply that by 2 to factor in the fact that the payout would be far down the road, and that there is risk. 7) What percentage share of equity would you need in order to equal that payout on exit? 8) Multiply that number by 2-3x to account for likely dilution over time. 9) If the founders aren't willing to give you that much equity in writing, then it's time to move on! If they are, then decide whether you're willing to take the risk in exchange for potentially big rewards (and of course, potentially empty pockets). It's a fascinating topic with a lot of speculation involved, so if you want to discuss in depth, set up a call with me on Clarity. Hope that helps!RD
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.