Loading...
Answers
MenuWhy mobile users prohibit apps sending push-messages?
Has anyone made any research on this topic?
Maybe the reason is lack of trust to the recently installed app or bad reputation of pushes?
Answers
You may think many users automatically prohibit the sending of push notifications and that may be the case for those who feel push notifications are intrusive and annoying. That being said, research actually indicates that app retention and engagement are up In fact, 68% of users opt-in to push notifications according to Responsys' research (http://www.responsys.com/blogs/nsm/mobile-marketing/push-notifications-marketers-new-power-tool/ ). Furthermore, research shows that engagement is up because of push notifications (http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1010950). . That's why marketers are focusing in on push notification strategies according to Localytics research http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Proof-App-Push-Notifications-Actually-Matter/1011149.
So if you know of an app getting poor engagement over time, the question really should be "Why is our app not engaging and what would engage users?" Also, "Is it obvious what benefit someone gets by opting into the push notifications?"
Push notifications are a great way to engage app users, as long as it's not annoying. One example of this is wayfinding apps with beacon technology that detect when mobile app users are nearby and send push notifications to let them know something important. In this case, push notifications could alert a user of a special sale, which can be perceived as spammy, or that they have arrived at a certain desired waypoint (more useful, and less spammy), along with interesting information about that location. Think of how useful these are for tourist destinations, like museums, zoos, etc.
You've downloaded xyz zoo app, walk near the big cat area and get a push notice, "grrrrowl, don't miss our feeding time. In 30 minutes you can see us chowing down on fresh antelope quarters".
Because it is annoying. Many people have various apps installed. If they enabled push for every app that would basically mean their phone ringing / vibrating almost every hour which is really annoying. They only enable push notification from important apps that are crucial for them such as Whatsapp or Twitter.
I believe you are victim of a popular misconception that mobile users prohibit apps sending push-messages. There are several MYTHS about push-messages that go about. I believe that would help you in better understand the situation:
Myth #1: App users do not opt-in to push notifications
False. Yes, they do! And for good reason. A study by Localytics shows that starting from app usage, the percentage of apps only used once is 11% for users that have opted-in push notifications, whereas that percentage goes up to 20% when push messages aren’t enabled. Moreover, an average (between iOS and Android users) of 52% app users enable push notifications – and they average 88% more app launches than those who disable push notifications entirely. Interesting, right?
Solution: Demonstrate why users should opt-in to push notifications in your app screenshots and preview video
Myth #2 – Push notifications are the spam of the mobile world
False. It is no news: all of us receive so many messages each day it is tough to see through them all to spot the ones that might matter to us. But the truth is that the problem starts from the strategy: if it is generalized and poorly crafted, it will only make unpleasant noise by generating messages that have exceptionally low relevance to who receives them. These poor-quality communications damage the user experience and give mobile messaging a bad name. Most messages sent via mobile are generic due to marketers’ fears of mis-personalization. As a result, messages are sent based on popular topics or alerts but without any true relation to each user’s preferred content. The result? Low engagement rates and even lower conversion rates.
Solution: Harness the power of personalization.
Myth #3 – Geolocalization is creepy
Oh, come on. Just because you can access mobile users immediately and at all times, doesn’t mean you should. There is no golden time zone. Mobile marketing is risky when done wrong – a push notification sent at a bad time (or place!) is one of the best ways to ruin the user experience and potentially lose a user forever. For example, if you’re a retail store planning to host a sample sale, make sure to use Geolocalization in your messages to attract people who live in the neighbourhood or may pass by – if you send out a push too late for someone who is too far away might make them feel annoyed for not being able to attend.
Solution: Be smart with your targeting
Myth #4 – Not everyone is interested in receiving notifications
False. The truth of the matter is that if they’ve opt-ed in, they see the benefits of getting updates – but it’s up to you to segment users so you’re sending users the most relevant messages possible. For example, a customer new to your brand should not receive the same messages as a customer who is already engaged. And a one-time user should receive quite different messaging from a once-active, now dormant user. Successful mobile-focused companies engage with their users at every stage of the mobile lifecycle. A crucial step is tailoring your communication to each user’s current engagement state with your brand – send them the right message for their current “state of app-mind” – this way you’ll increase relevance for your users, and your chances to raise loyalty rates.
Solution: Segment users according to your mCRM strategy
Myth #5 – Push Notifications are a smartphone thing only
False, again. Digital brand engagement is not just about mobile apps. For most companies, relationships with customers are created across web, mobile web, apps, and social networks, and your push notification campaigns should be informed about customer behaviour across all digital platforms. According to Pew Research, over 40% of consumers own a tablet and a smartphone, and brands need to be conscious of this when sending notifications. The best way to spam your users is to bombard them with duplicate messages – a hazard that is especially tricky to avoid when the modern customer owns more than one device. Worse yet, device-based messaging results in mis-personalized push notifications.
Solution: Know your users’ habits through feedback and analytics.
Besides if you do have any questions give me a call: https://clarity.fm/joy-brotonath
Related Questions
-
How can I sell my app idea, and do I need to get it patented?
This is a little hard to answer because it is so vague. It depends on the area, the market and the strength of innovation. I know that The App Guy has a terrific podcast at http://www.theappguy.co/ and is also trying to organize a community for App developers to sell their ideas. Let me know if I can be of further assistance to discuss patentability in terms of its value to getting a sale or license. What ever you do, don't spend money filing a full patent, just a provisional. Good luck.TH
-
Where is the best place to find an affordable mobile app developer?
You can hire app development freelancers from www.odesk.com and www.elance.com. I am an app developer myself, and I got profiles on both of these networks, a link is given below: https://www.odesk.com/users/~012d73aa92fad47188 Please feel free to get in touch to discuss ideas and clarify any confusions, I will be glad to help.NA
-
Do angel investors look for a certain number of active users when investing in an app startup that has recently launched, 5,000-10,000+?
First of all, there is no "one size fits all" attitude in angel investing. I will tell you that the *best* angels will make a snap decision by playing with the product and assessing founder/market fit. At the right valuation, the kinds of angels you really want backing you will invest purely based on a killer early product experience and conviction of founder/market fit. But if you have made your app available in the US app store already, you have made a critical tactical error if your app isn't already trending towards 100,000 installs within the first 30 days of availability. Apps should first launch in a non US, english-speaking store to do early product/market fit work. Your "day one" event in the US app store matters to seed investors and many angel investors. While there are exceptions (most often in SaaS or enterprise mobile models), there are only 4 times to raise funding from seed funds for a mobile start-up stage company: Pre-product: A deck, a market opportunity and a team. Pre-launch: Product fully built but holding launch for funding. This will usually involve a private beta of at least 1000 users or a soft launch in an international store. 30 - 90 days after US launch: Must be at or trending towards 100,000 installs with very strong month-over-month growth. If you miss those windows, the next time to raise is after you pass over 1,000,000 with strong retention and engagement that correlates to your business model and user personas. As a mobile-first entrepreneur and angel investor, I'm happy to talk to you about this in more detailTW
-
What is the best mobile app install tracking solution? By this I mean a solution that truly (or nearly) tracks click to install of app on iOS.
Sure, it's correlative for technical reasons, iTunes / AppStore does not provide (yet, might change) a mechanism for that, so 3rd parties have to build their own. I recently discussed with people from Adjust and I was really impressed. HasOffers / MobileAppTracking seems to be a good choice as well.AJ
-
How does the dating app Hinge market and acquire interest before they enter a new city?
They are getting interest through their traction in other cities. Since they are already in 20 cities and have approximately half a million users if you look at their Android app (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.hinge.mobile.android), they can simply wait until one city "tips". This might also just be a strategy to artificially use scarcity since it works sometimes, such as with Mailbox(http://www.nirandfar.com/2013/07/psychology-of-scarcity.html). I think it doesn't really matter if they launch city after city, as they have $8M in funding and can just spend $5,000 on Facebook Ads and get 1,000 user in one city within a day. The effect of scarcity makes sense, if you are new and if you're a hyped startup such as Mailbox used to be. On the other hand, it makes sense if you don't have the resources to launch in many cities such as Uber, because they need the drivers first. I can also schedule a call, where I can tell you more about this as I've done a lot of apps and have a social network myself with Tennis Buddy.MK
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.