Loading...
Answers
MenuIs it unwise for an entrepreneur to sign a non-disclosure agreement?
I'm a tech entrepreneur who recently met with another tech entrepreneur who is in the same industry. He wants to potentially work with me but before he can talk about his venture he wants me to sign a non-disclosure agreement.
Answers
Non-disclosure agreements are very common. Know that a non-disclosure agreement goes both ways as well. A contract agreement should also protects you from the other party disclosing any trade secrets or know-hows that they may learn from working with you.
Most established entrepreneurs aren't fond of signing NDA's because they can be too open worded and may prevent the entrepreneur from developing ideas and businesses off the fringe of the idea/trade secrets covered within the NDA. I certainly wouldn't sign an NDA unless there was an extremely compelling reason to. I would also be inclined to make sure the NDA was applied equally to both parties involved, and was very specific as to scope.
+1 for what Chris said. I usually wait to sign NDAs until very late in the process because most deals fall through and NDAs can limit one's freedom to act on ideas you had BEFORE you even met Mr. So-and-So. For example, if I later tell a programmer to start working on an app idea from two years ago, then a particularly litigious company could claim that I had wrongfully disclosed some of their ideas. So when someone asks you to sign an NDA in the first or second conversation, politely decline and offer the reasoning above. Say that you'd like to get to know the person better before signing anything. Say you'll be happy to answer specific questions about your experience and expertise. Say that you don't mean to be a stick in the mud, but you've found that two potential partners can have a meaningful discussion about partnership without inking paper. Over the past several years I've learned several things: 1) the people fondest of NDAs are the people least likely to act on their ideas; 2) as often as not, the person asking you to sign one really just wants free consulting; and 3) experienced businesspeople know that ideas are worthless without execution. Thus, they're typically not worried about divulging a few of their secrets because they know that 99% of listeners will do nothing with the information. The last thing I'll say is this: the bigger the promises, the harder the fall. So perhaps find a way to collaborate on a few smaller tasks or projects before hopping into business bed together.
Hope this helps,
Austin
Lots of good input here already. I concur with most of it. Make sure the NDA offers mutual protection and provides for a remedy that is reasonable. I would also suggest adding 'non-circumvention' language.
Just my thoughts...
I have been involved in entrepreneurial endeavors for many years and HATE NDA's. While I understand the importance, most people want you to sign them because they think they have the next best thing! Truth is, I keep my secrets close and will not share them with anyone that I don't trust or only trust if they sign an NDA. NDA's are important in longer term contracts and when working deep in the daily operations of the organization of which whom you are working with, and NEED to protect both parties. That said, they are only as strong as your pockets are deep when it comes to legal standing and there should be a level of trust established prior to sharing information that may be detrimental if in the wrong hands.
I will sign NDA's if it is a requirement in doing business and feel the relationship requires one, however, if it does, I really search my gut as to if it is a relationship that I want to be in long term and if what I am signing is two sided and would we both feel fine moving forward without one.
I have purchased businesses on handshakes and feel you really need to trust your gut and work with people you can trust.
Again, just my thoughts.
-Branden
I personally am very hesitant to sign non-disclosure agreements especially with those in the same industry AND new to my circles. Just my opinion, but the thing about ideas is that they are essentially worthless without the execution. No matter how 'great' or 'innovative' one might think their idea may be, entrepreneurs are usually too busy working on their own 'great' or 'innovative' idea to replace it with another. If the other person is not willing to risk some sort trust level of information then maybe you are better off moving on. If you feel the upside outweighs the downside such as you already have an established relationship with this party/ have validated this lead/feel you want to explore more, make sure the NDA goes both ways.
✅ TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)
No, it’s not unwise — but it depends.
Signing an NDA early in a conversation can be risky if it’s:
Too broad
One-sided
Poorly written
A good NDA should be mutual, specific, and aligned with the stage of the conversation. In some cases, refusing to sign may halt progress — but that’s not always a bad thing. Trust, judgment, and clarity matter more than a standard template.
🧠 Full Answer
NDAs are a normal part of doing business — but timing, structure, and trust are everything.
Here’s how to think through it:
⚖️ 1. Assess the Stage of Conversation
First call or pitch deck? → Likely too early to sign anything
Diligence stage with serious intent? → Signing may make sense. You shouldn’t be legally bound to secrecy before even knowing whether a real opportunity exists.
🤝 2. Request a Mutual NDA
If you're open to signing:
Ask for a mutual NDA — one that protects both parties
Avoid NDAs that prohibit things like "working on similar ideas" or that are so broad they trap you for years
Always read carefully or have a lawyer skim it.
🧠 3. Know the Real Risk
Ideas are rarely the real asset — execution is.
You won’t lose much by hearing a high-level pitch. But signing a poorly worded NDA can cost you freedom to build your own ideas later, especially if you’re working in the same space.
🔄 4. Flip the Conversation if Needed
If someone insists on an NDA too early, try this:
“I understand your need to protect your IP, but I typically don’t sign NDAs at the exploratory stage. Happy to hear the high-level version and see if we’re aligned. If we go deeper, we can revisit the legal part.”
If they refuse — that tells you something, too.
🔍 What Was Missed or Confused in Previous Answers
❌ “People who use NDAs aren’t serious” – Overgeneralized. Some people use NDAs simply because that’s how they were advised.
❌ “Ideas are worthless” – Not always. Execution is key, but some early-stage IP or tech concepts do require discretion.
❌ “I hate NDAs” – Emotion ≠ legal guidance. Many responses shared opinions but didn’t clarify the legal or strategic risks of signing the wrong NDA.
✅ Correct point that NDAs only matter if you can afford to enforce them. A contract is only as strong as the party willing to defend it.
🧭 Final Word
NDAs are not inherently unwise — but blindly signing one is.
👉 If you're considering it:Ask for mutual terms
Read the scope carefully
Make sure it's tied to a specific opportunity, not every idea under the sun
✅ TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read)
No, it’s not unwise — but it depends.
Signing an NDA early in a conversation can be risky if it’s:
Too broad
One-sided
Poorly written
A good NDA should be mutual, specific, and aligned with the stage of the conversation. In some cases, refusing to sign may halt progress — but that’s not always a bad thing. Trust, judgment, and clarity matter more than a standard template.
🧠 Full Answer
NDAs are a normal part of doing business — but timing, structure, and trust are everything.
Here’s how to think through it:
⚖️ 1. Assess the Stage of Conversation
First call or pitch deck? → Likely too early to sign anything
Diligence stage with serious intent? → Signing may make sense
You shouldn’t be legally bound to secrecy before even knowing whether a real opportunity exists.
🤝 2. Request a Mutual NDA
If you're open to signing:
Ask for a mutual NDA — one that protects both parties
Avoid NDAs that prohibit things like "working on similar ideas" or that are so broad they trap you for years
Always read carefully or have a lawyer skim it.
🧠 3. Know the Real Risk
Ideas are rarely the real asset — execution is.
You won’t lose much by hearing a high-level pitch. But signing a poorly worded NDA can cost you freedom to build your own ideas later, especially if you’re working in the same space.
🔄 4. Flip the Conversation if Needed
If someone insists on an NDA too early, try this:
“I understand your need to protect your IP, but I typically don’t sign NDAs at the exploratory stage. Happy to hear the high-level version and see if we’re aligned. If we go deeper, we can revisit the legal part.”
If they refuse — that tells you something, too.
🔍 What Was Missed or Confused in Previous Answers
❌ “People who use NDAs aren’t serious” – Overgeneralized. Some people use NDAs simply because that’s how they were advised.
❌ “Ideas are worthless” – Not always. Execution is key, but some early-stage IP or tech concepts do require discretion.
❌ “I hate NDAs” – Emotion ≠ legal guidance. Many responses shared opinions but didn’t clarify the legal or strategic risks of signing the wrong NDA.
✅ Correct point that NDAs only matter if you can afford to enforce them. A contract is only as strong as the party willing to defend it.
🧭 Final Word
NDAs are not inherently unwise — but blindly signing one is.
👉 If you're considering it:
Ask for mutual terms
Read the scope carefully
Make sure it's tied to a specific opportunity, not every idea under the sun
Would you like a free mutual NDA template you can suggest instead of accepting theirs? I’m happy to share a vetted one that keeps the conversation fair — and if you’d prefer to talk it through, we can schedule a quick call to walk through it together.
Related Questions
-
I have this social media idea,but no coding skills. How do I get someone to do the coding (cant afford to pay them) and not give away half of my idea?
Dilip was very kind in his response. My answer might be a bit on the "tough love" side. But that's for you to decide. My intention, just for the record, is to help you (and those like you) on your path to success. And that starts with having a viable philosophy about entrepreneurial-ism and business. And I'm going to answer this because I get asked some form / version of this question very frequently from newcomers to entrepreneurial-ism. The scenario goes something like this: "I have a great idea. It's amazing, I love it, and I just KNOW it's gonna make me a ton of money. But I have no money right now so I can't afford to (fill in the blank with things like "to build it / create it / market it / etc" or "to hire the required staff needed to work in my business to sell it / develop it / etc"). And I don't want to tell anyone about my great idea because I'm worried someone will steal it and make MY million / billion dollars. But I can't afford to legally protect it either... So how do I launch without the skills to personally create the product AND no money to hire anyone else to do that either??" The answer is ... You don't. Look - let's be honest. All you have is an idea. Big deal. Really. I'm not saying it's not a good idea. I'm not saying that if properly executed it couldn't make you a million / billion dollars... But an idea is NOT a business. Nor is it an asset. Until you do some (very important) initial work - like creating a business model, doing customer development, creating a MVP, etc - all you really have is a dream. Right now your choices are: 1. Find someone with the skills or the money to develop your idea and sell them on WHY they should invest in you. And yes, this will mean giving up either a portion of the "ownership" or of future income or equity. And the more risk they have to take - the more equity they will want (and quite frankly be entitled to). 2. Learn how to code and build it yourself. MANY entrepreneurs without financial resources are still resourceful. They develop the skills needed to create what they don't have the money to pay someone else to do. 3. Get some cash so you can pay someone to do the coding. You'll probably have to have some knowledge of coding to direct the architecture of your idea. So you will likely still have to become knowledgeable even if its not you personally doing the coding. (This is not meant to be a comprehensive list of options... And I'm sure some of the other experts here on Clarity have others to add - and I hope they do) To wrap up - Here's my final tip to you that I hope you "get"... It's FAR more valuable to have an idea that a very specific hungry crowd is clamoring for right now - One that THEY would love and pay you for right now - Maybe even one they'd pre-order because they just have to have it - Versus YOU being in love with your own idea. [Notice I didn't say "an idea that some as-of-yet-undetermined market would probably love"] I wish you the best of luck moving forward.DB
-
How much equity should I ask as a CMO in a startup?
Greater risk = greater equity. How likely is this to fail or just break even? If you aren't receiving salary yet are among 4-6 non-founders with equivalent sweat investment, all of whom are lower on the totem pole than the two founders, figure out: 1) Taking into account all likely outcomes, what is the most likely outcome in terms of exit? (ex: $10MM.) Keep in mind that 90%+ of all tech startups fail (Allmand Law study), and of those that succeed 88% of M&A deals are under $100MM. Startups that exit at $1B+ are so rare they are called "unicorns"... so don't count on that, no matter how exciting it feels right now. 2) Figure out what 1% equity would give you in terms of payout for the most likely exit. For example, a $10MM exit would give you $100k for every 1% you own. 3) Decide what the chance is that the startup will fail / go bankrupt / get stuck at a $1MM business with no exit in sight. (According to Allman Law's study, 10% stay in business - and far fewer than that actually exit). 4) Multiply the % chance of success by the likely outcome if successful. Now each 1% of equity is worth $10k. You could get lucky and have it be worth millions, or it could be worth nothing. (With the hypothetical numbers I'm giving here, including the odds, you are working for $10k per 1% equity received if the most likely exit is $10MM and the % chance of failure is 90%.) 5) Come up with a vesting path. Commit to one year, get X equity at the end. If you were salaried, the path would be more like 4 years, but since it's free you deserve instant equity as long as you follow through for a reasonable period of time. 6) Assuming you get agreement in writing from the founders, what amount of $ would you take in exchange for 12 months of free work? Now multiply that by 2 to factor in the fact that the payout would be far down the road, and that there is risk. 7) What percentage share of equity would you need in order to equal that payout on exit? 8) Multiply that number by 2-3x to account for likely dilution over time. 9) If the founders aren't willing to give you that much equity in writing, then it's time to move on! If they are, then decide whether you're willing to take the risk in exchange for potentially big rewards (and of course, potentially empty pockets). It's a fascinating topic with a lot of speculation involved, so if you want to discuss in depth, set up a call with me on Clarity. Hope that helps!RD
-
If I have 51 percent and my partner has 49 percent of our company, what real decision making authority would I have?
On paper you have the advantage but after several startups control resides in he who knows how to execute the vision of the company.HJ
-
How has Uber grown so fast?
Obviously, they do the fundamentals well. Good brand. Good experience. Good word of mouth. Good PR. Etc. Etc. But after my interview with Ryan Graves, the head of Global Operations at Uber (https://www.growthhacker.tv/ryan-graves), it became clear that they are operationally advanced and this is a huge part of their success. I'll explain. Uber isn't just a single startup, it's essentially dozens of startups rolled into one because every time they enter a new city they have to establish themselves from essentially nothing (except whatever brand equity has reached the city ahead of them). This means finding/training drivers, marketing to consumers, and building out local staff to manage operations for that city. This is where Ryan Graves comes in. He has a protocol of everything that must be done, and in what order, and by who, to ensure the best chance of success in a new city. So how has Uber grown so fast? Essentially, they figured out how to grow in one locale and were relentless about refining their launch process to recreate that initial success over and over in new cities. No plan works for every city, and they've had to adapt in many situations, but it is still a driving factor for their success.BT
-
How was SnapChat able to grow so quickly?
I'm answering your question assuming that you hope to be able to replicate it's own success in your own mobile app. There are a couple of factors responsible for it's growth that are instructive to anyone building a mobile app. "Leveraging the intimacy and privacy of the mobile phone." We now have an *intimate* relationship with our phone like no other device in the history of technology. Every internet company that started before around 2010 has built their core interactions around "the old web" one which was accessed primarily via a browser on a computer. Companies that start with a clean slate, should be building their interactions around how to do whatever the app is supposed to do while leveraging what is unique to people's relationship to their mobile devices. Photo-sharing has become a core part of the way we communicate now. Snapchat built something that provided an experience that leveraged the feeling of privacy and intimacy that is unique to mobile. "Provided an escape from the "maturity" of other online services." Too many parents, aunts, uncles and other "old people" have encroached into the social networks of teens and young people. As a result, they've had a desire to find places to express themselves in places inaccessible by older generations. An important distinction is that it's not just parents and relatives that young people are trying to avoid, but also employers & colleges who are increasingly using "mature" social networks to review applicants. "Leveraged PR even bad PR" The fact that the app got so much press about it being used to sext was perfect PR for the company, as it essentially reinforced the brand experience that it has today. Essentially, "if it's safe enough to send a sext, it's safe for any kind of communication I want to have." And although the safety and security of Snapchat is actually not as advertised, it still enjoys the reputation of having less impact than any primarily web-based service. Building a successful mobile application is one of the hardest challenges to face designers, programmers and entrepreneurs in the history of writing software. Happy to talk to you if you're considering building a mobile app, about what I've learned about the "table stakes" for success.TW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.