Loading...
Answers
MenuStarting two businesses at once. Is it recommended for a new entrepreneur?
So I have two business ideas that I am fully committed to starting. One of them is a clothing company that I have been wanting to start for quite sometime now. The other is a online company that I am insanely stoked about trying to start up. The thing is, I am starting the clothing brand with a buddy of mine. So it will be a little easier to focus on both with having someone accompany me while I'm starting the other. I am very young(turning 20) and have a part time job, but just want to see what others think about this. I know internet start ups can be difficult especially with no technical experience, but I'm just so eager to get things started. Thanks for the responses in advance!
Answers
I think as a first-time entrepreneur who is non-technical, you should focus 100% of your energy on your clothing business with your buddy. There is far less required to make a clothing business a success than a startup run by a non-technical founder. I don't mean to trivialize the challenges of running an apparel company (there are many) but comparatively, there is a greater chance of you having success with the apparel business than a startup.
But you *reduce* your chances of success by diluting your focus with other ideas.
Happy to talk to you in a call about starting off on the right foot with a cofounder.
This is definitely NOT recommended.
Don't waste time trying to figure out WHY this is a bad idea. Just choose one venture and get to work.
You are obviously passionate about your ideas. That passion will help you get through some of the challenges you'll no doubt have to face in the very near future.
But in my experience passion is not enough (at least not in business!).
I'd HIGHLY suggest you work out an initial business model before you invest any money.
At the very least - do what you can to learn if there is a market this is equally excited AND that they are willing to pay for it AND that you can build a viable business around that product / market match.
WARNING: Assuming that any of those factors are true without completing your due diligence BEFORE you get started is a recipe for failure.
Since you are a "new entrepreneur" it would be wise to invest in a mentor. Find one here on Clarity - or tap your personal network.
If what I've said resonates with you let's talk and I will help get you off to a strong start.
In any case - I wish you the best of luck and great success!
For nearly a decade (all of my 20's) I reveled in my ability to juggle multiple businesses at the same time (2 or 3 + consulting). But what I started noticing on the tail end of that was that I was becoming amazing at being mediocre.
What I've found over the past couple of years it that focus is the difference between running a $50,000/year business and a $500,000/year business.
Focus let's you make that good thing great.
Having your hand in many different things can feel like a great way to diversify and mitigate risk, but what will pay off more in the long run is to quickly "prove" which business has a better chance of being successful and then drop the other and move on.
Happy to have a call about what my experience has been over the past 10-12 years of doing just this.
If you are considering two different businesses, don't do either. When the business is right for you, it will be the only one. Entrepreneurship can be like marriage in that way.
Although I teach my clients how to create multiple streams of income, I would definitely say focus 100% of your attention on the business that you are MORE PASSION about. It will take passion to launch and continue to drive that first business and keep it successful. Once you've mastered the ins and out of the business you are more excited about, then you'll have the track record and the confidence to venture out into territory with a new multiple stream of income with the next business. The quicker you get rolling with the first one, the sooner the next business can follow quickly behind!
If you need assistance, tools or just a ear to bounce ideas off of, request a call.
In my personal experience, whenever I've tried to run multiple businesses, at least one or all of them have failed (failed meaning either zero or very little revenue)
Looking at my friends (95% of which are tech entrepreneurs or lifestyle business owners) any of them who have tried multiple businesses at once, either one or all of them have failed.
There's usually a period where you think "Hey this is possible, it's working great!" and you see a bit of growth or a bit of traction, but it's only 2 years in that you look back and realised that you have 2 projects turning over £50k each, when you could have had a single project turning over £500k
Now looking at your current situation from what you've told us:
1) Starting a business with a cofounder who is as committed as you is an order of magnitude better than starting something on your own
2) As a non-technical entrepreneur, I would advise staying away from the onlne business until you have either a technical cofounder or at least £100k in your back pocket in disposable investment
3) Does the clothing business excite you? I'm thinking not, as when something really excites you, you shouldn't even be considering anything else. So maybe neither of these projects are right for you.
My advice: go and get a job working for the company you wish you had created. Find a company where the product, industry, culture, brand... everything is something you love and wish you had done yourself. Work there for however long it takes to find something that creates a burning passion inside of you, and provides you with the right network, connections, experiences (and maybe cofounders or investors) to get it started.
My biggest regret in my entrepreneurial career is that I didn't spend any time looking at how other entrepreneurs had done it. I just read about it and dove in, and spent many, many hungry years making all the same mistakes that everyone before me had already made!
It depends of how much your involvement in both business, business models and your level of motivation to push both projects forward. You're turning 20.. this is the time.. if you wish to push to the limit.
If you stuck, you know where to find for great answers right? All the best
Related Questions
-
If I have a business idea for a large company, how can I give it to them and mutually profit, without them just taking the idea and squashing me?
Probably not the answer you're looking for, but companies have so many unimplemented ideas that the likelihood of partnering to implement someone else's idea is really low. And besides which, the idea is not something that has much value in and of itself. If you're passionate in the idea, build it yourself. That's the only way you can have leverage.TW
-
How much equity should I ask as a CMO in a startup?
Greater risk = greater equity. How likely is this to fail or just break even? If you aren't receiving salary yet are among 4-6 non-founders with equivalent sweat investment, all of whom are lower on the totem pole than the two founders, figure out: 1) Taking into account all likely outcomes, what is the most likely outcome in terms of exit? (ex: $10MM.) Keep in mind that 90%+ of all tech startups fail (Allmand Law study), and of those that succeed 88% of M&A deals are under $100MM. Startups that exit at $1B+ are so rare they are called "unicorns"... so don't count on that, no matter how exciting it feels right now. 2) Figure out what 1% equity would give you in terms of payout for the most likely exit. For example, a $10MM exit would give you $100k for every 1% you own. 3) Decide what the chance is that the startup will fail / go bankrupt / get stuck at a $1MM business with no exit in sight. (According to Allman Law's study, 10% stay in business - and far fewer than that actually exit). 4) Multiply the % chance of success by the likely outcome if successful. Now each 1% of equity is worth $10k. You could get lucky and have it be worth millions, or it could be worth nothing. (With the hypothetical numbers I'm giving here, including the odds, you are working for $10k per 1% equity received if the most likely exit is $10MM and the % chance of failure is 90%.) 5) Come up with a vesting path. Commit to one year, get X equity at the end. If you were salaried, the path would be more like 4 years, but since it's free you deserve instant equity as long as you follow through for a reasonable period of time. 6) Assuming you get agreement in writing from the founders, what amount of $ would you take in exchange for 12 months of free work? Now multiply that by 2 to factor in the fact that the payout would be far down the road, and that there is risk. 7) What percentage share of equity would you need in order to equal that payout on exit? 8) Multiply that number by 2-3x to account for likely dilution over time. 9) If the founders aren't willing to give you that much equity in writing, then it's time to move on! If they are, then decide whether you're willing to take the risk in exchange for potentially big rewards (and of course, potentially empty pockets). It's a fascinating topic with a lot of speculation involved, so if you want to discuss in depth, set up a call with me on Clarity. Hope that helps!RD
-
How has Uber grown so fast?
Obviously, they do the fundamentals well. Good brand. Good experience. Good word of mouth. Good PR. Etc. Etc. But after my interview with Ryan Graves, the head of Global Operations at Uber (https://www.growthhacker.tv/ryan-graves), it became clear that they are operationally advanced and this is a huge part of their success. I'll explain. Uber isn't just a single startup, it's essentially dozens of startups rolled into one because every time they enter a new city they have to establish themselves from essentially nothing (except whatever brand equity has reached the city ahead of them). This means finding/training drivers, marketing to consumers, and building out local staff to manage operations for that city. This is where Ryan Graves comes in. He has a protocol of everything that must be done, and in what order, and by who, to ensure the best chance of success in a new city. So how has Uber grown so fast? Essentially, they figured out how to grow in one locale and were relentless about refining their launch process to recreate that initial success over and over in new cities. No plan works for every city, and they've had to adapt in many situations, but it is still a driving factor for their success.BT
-
How can I smoothly transition from full time worker to self-employment?
The ways I've done this in the past are 1) Find some customers that are willing to hire you (or your product) but know that you'll only be free nights & weekends to support/work with them. 2) Find a "partner" (co-founder or other) that's got a flexible schedule that can help build the business while you're at work. 3) Block out nights, mornings and weekends to build the business till you have enough orders to cover 50% of your salary. This might mean 7pm-11pm most nights, and 4 hours each day Sat & Sun. Make progress (sales $$$) and momentum. All that being said, it's risk reward. Sounds like you want to avoid taken the risk, and I get that .. but the upside is always smaller. Unless you put yourself in a position to have to succeed (ex: quitting your job) then you may never make the scary decisions that are required to build a company (like cold calling, going in debt, making a presentation, etc). I'm on company #5 with many other side projects started nights & weekends .. so I get it - but don't be afraid to bet on yourself and go all in.DM
-
How was SnapChat able to grow so quickly?
I'm answering your question assuming that you hope to be able to replicate it's own success in your own mobile app. There are a couple of factors responsible for it's growth that are instructive to anyone building a mobile app. "Leveraging the intimacy and privacy of the mobile phone." We now have an *intimate* relationship with our phone like no other device in the history of technology. Every internet company that started before around 2010 has built their core interactions around "the old web" one which was accessed primarily via a browser on a computer. Companies that start with a clean slate, should be building their interactions around how to do whatever the app is supposed to do while leveraging what is unique to people's relationship to their mobile devices. Photo-sharing has become a core part of the way we communicate now. Snapchat built something that provided an experience that leveraged the feeling of privacy and intimacy that is unique to mobile. "Provided an escape from the "maturity" of other online services." Too many parents, aunts, uncles and other "old people" have encroached into the social networks of teens and young people. As a result, they've had a desire to find places to express themselves in places inaccessible by older generations. An important distinction is that it's not just parents and relatives that young people are trying to avoid, but also employers & colleges who are increasingly using "mature" social networks to review applicants. "Leveraged PR even bad PR" The fact that the app got so much press about it being used to sext was perfect PR for the company, as it essentially reinforced the brand experience that it has today. Essentially, "if it's safe enough to send a sext, it's safe for any kind of communication I want to have." And although the safety and security of Snapchat is actually not as advertised, it still enjoys the reputation of having less impact than any primarily web-based service. Building a successful mobile application is one of the hardest challenges to face designers, programmers and entrepreneurs in the history of writing software. Happy to talk to you if you're considering building a mobile app, about what I've learned about the "table stakes" for success.TW
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.