Loading...
Answers
MenuWhat are the legal requirements for a cryptocurrency exchange in the United States that does not handle fiat currency?
Essentially what are the legal requirements for starting the next Binance, Bittrex etc. When I say in the United States I mean US based customers (preferably registered in the US as well.)
Answers
The US Gov hates cryptocurrency. In fact if you read recent laws (last 5 years) you'll find the language is vague + it can be construed that if you're a US citizen + you hold cryptocurrency, you may be in violation of law.
Better to simply stick with fiat currency produced by every government in the world.
Treat income management as a currency exchange proposition.
Whatever language you speak, just target selling whatever you're selling into a country that reverse correlates the highest to your currency.
So if you live in New Zealand + US currency is strong against the Kiwi, then sell product into the US.
This way you always win big, because some currency in some country will always be your best investment.
itcoin exchanges, miners, and cryptocurrency-payment processors, operating in the United States are required to comply with federal Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws.
That means a cryptocurrency user can be prosecuted for violating a number of federal laws. Anybody who converts BTC to USD and sends the money to or from the United States must comply with all AML laws and regulations.
Such laws and regulations are imposed by the U.S. Treasury Department affiliate, FinCEN. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is in charge of enforcing the policies and regulations, which serve as a security measure for conducting any financial activity within the U.S. borders.
All money service businesses, including Bitcoin exchanges, come within the provisions of these laws and guarantee a strong bank secrecy, as well as money laundering control. In the case a financial organization fails to abide by the policy, FinCEN is entitled to recourse through competent legal authorities like the FBI or the U.S. Secret Service.
Besides that you will be required to register with SEC.
I don't agree that the US government hates cryptocurrency or crypto exchanges, though I will say that the USG is still unsure how to manage crypto.
The legal requirements vary based on what state you are trying to set up an exchange.
Current Federal law puts regulation of crypto under the jurisdiction of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission. While the Securities Exchange Commision has brought some enforcement cases forward, the courts as of now have sided with the CFTC. So make sure you are following those requirements.
At the same time, each state has (probably, but I can verify) their own registration rules for anyone that participates in bitcoin (i.e. mining, trading, selling, or thinking about mining, trading or selling etc). Many states are taking a second look at those rules as crypto grows in popularity and as regulators figure out how to regulate it appropriately. For example, NYS has registration rules, but it also has legislation that would form a task force to evaluate current rules and propose changes. NY also had the first locality ban cryptomining (Plattsburg), so that will also be part of the discussion. It is timely, as some of the big Wall Street players are looking at launching U.S.-based exchanges.
Incidentally, NYS also has legilstion to study the possibility to launch its own cryptocurrency. That could get interesting.
Hope that helps. Happy to set up a call to chat more about any specific state regulations.
Good luck!
I would suggest that if you are a US citizen that wants to get into crypto from an institutional perspective, you set up an offshore decentralized exchange that doesn't allow US citizens, this has a lower cost of entry. Unfortunately, due to various antiquated US government regulations, you are limited to the number of services your exchange can provide (such as peer-to-peer lending); thus affecting the overall amount of transaction and service fees one can collect. Once you are profitable with that exchange, you can think about opening up to US customers with a separate website, and base trading ability only. Overall, you are going to spend a minimum of 4x the startup costs in the US compared to more lax countries such as Cypress. Here are some links to get you started:
https://www.coinsclone.com/blog/how-to-start-a-cryptocurrency-exchange-business/
https://complyadvantage.com/blog/cryptocurrency-regulations-around-world/
https://premieroffshore.com/where-to-start-a-cryptocurrency-exchange-crypto-friendly-countries/
Best of luck. If you have any other questions or need any further help, please feel free to contact me. I am always available.
I believe this link will be immensely helpful for you: https://complyadvantage.com/blog/cryptocurrency-regulations-around-world/
Besides if you do have any questions give me a call: https://clarity.fm/joy-brotonath
I would advise US citizens looking to enter the crypto market from an institutional standpoint to consider setting up an offshore decentralized exchange that does not cater to US citizens. This option allows for a lower cost of entry. However, it is important to note that outdated government regulations in the US restrict the range of services that such an exchange can offer, including peer-to-peer lending. This limitation directly impacts the potential earnings from transaction and service fees. Once the offshore exchange becomes profitable, it may be worth considering the establishment of a separate website specifically for US customers, focusing solely on trading capabilities.
Overall, it is essential to recognize that starting a crypto exchange in the US will require a minimum investment that is four times higher compared to countries with more lenient regulations, like Cyprus.
To help you get started, here are some useful links:
https://complyadvantage.com/insights/cryptocurrency-regulations-around-world/
How to start the cryptocurrency exchange easily: https://www.alphacodez.com/binance-clone-script
Related Questions
-
Do entrepreneurs need to do illegal things and break the law? When is breaking the law justified?
More of a political answer than anything to be honest. Laws are created by politicians, politicians make their decisions based on lobbyists & public opinion. Lobbyists and public opinion can both be bought. One person only has one vote, a company can persuade millions of votes. Imagine what would happen if Facebook (or Reddit) put a tiny icon that say "Vote ________ for president", how many people that would influence to vote. Businesses are what influence & create laws in the end. Even your personal opinions come from businesses. Is it something you read in a book? Author makes money, textbook makes money. Read it on the internet? The website makes money. Learned it in school? University makes money, professor makes money. A business that is breaking a law is really just fighting the status quo of the established businesses, which might be why often new businesses think or might assume they need to do something illegal to get ahead. While established businesses such as Comcast or Facebook can break laws and it be "legal" (because they do it in the right way of course). But no, entrepreneurs don't need to do illegal things and break the law. Pick a business model, any business model, and then do it better.KC
-
Where to incorporate a new software as a service busines?
I'll keep try to keep this answer brief, but there are several factors and nuances that can be discussed in more depth. Where you decide to incorporate partly depends on what your future goals are with your company. Companies that plan to seek venture capital or go public typically choose Delaware as the state of incorporation, and usually choose a C-Corp. Delaware has a very well developed body of law surrounding corporate governance and that provides comfort and more certainty to future VC investors. If you're not planning to seek VC money any time soon, an LLC is a smart decision because of the tax benefits it can provide to you as the owner. It sounds like you want to grow your company on your own without outside financing. If that's the case, I would recommend forming your LLC in California. Regarding California vs. Delaware, one benefit to forming your LLC in California is that you can avoid paying a registered agent fee which can cost anywhere from $100-200 a year. If you plan to seek venture capital down the road, you can reincorporate in Delaware.JI
-
If I come up with a coaching methodology / formula, is it protected under Copyright?
(I'm a small biz attorney who helps people with copyright, trademark, and other IP law, and I'm answering per U.S. law.) As soon as you take your idea and put it into a tangible format (write it down, create an infographic, record a video), then that writing/infographic/video is automatically protected by copyright law. You can record the copyright on it too, which makes it easier to protect and get damages from other people taking it. But the formula itself would be probably protected under trade secret law or patent law. Patent law obviously takes a bit more effort, because you have to apply for the patent and get your application examined by the USPTO, which takes years and $$$. Keeping it protected under trade secret law means you have to make an effort to keep it secret (which may not work if you are disclosing it as part of your marketing efforts), such as keeping it confidential and requiring NDAs. As someone else said, the other terms you use might be protected under trademark law. If a member of the public would use those terms to link your products/services with the source of the product/service (aka, your company), then they could be trademark-able. There are some state law protections for trademarks, and you can also file to register the trademark with the USPTO and get more protection. Hope that gets your started!EP
-
Do I have to file form 5472 for "additional paid-in capital"?
Yes you should be reporting the capital contributions. Under the old Form 5472 rules, it's true that only items that impacted taxable income would be reportable transactions. So, a capital contribution by you to the corporation would not be reportable, unless the equity contribution was somehow below or above a fair value contribution in exchange for services that you might provide for the corporation - essentially an imputed reportable transactions. When the IRS changed the Form 5472 rules to require non-U.S. owned single member LLC's, they expanded the reportable transaction definition to include virtually everything. The term “transaction” is defined in Treas. Regs. Section 1.482-1(i)(7) to include any sale, assignment, lease, license, loan, advance, contribution or other transfer of any interest in or a right to use any property or money, as well as the performance of any services for the benefit of, or on behalf of, another taxpayer. So, for example, contributions and distributions would be considered reportable transactions with respect to such entities. These amounts can be reported on Lines 12 and 25 with an explanatory footnote that clarities the amounts are capital contributions and not amounts that impact taxable income.JK
-
Which governing law is best to use for an NDA between a Swedish and a Hong Kong company?
The HKG company has the same commercial law set of UK, that said, between the two it would be safer using an NDA fitting the latter.PA
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.