Loading...
Answers
MenuFor our new social app, should we focus on capturing more user data upon registration or simplifying the process to increase our potential user base?
Answers
Try not to think of your "conversion" as a single instance in your app users experience, but a series of nodes that have no try end point. Starting with the on-boarding process after they've DL'd the app it's important to understand what your conversion funnel looks like sequentially. For example, try breaking out the content into a few input opportunities so users can give you the base-level info (and not impede signups or frustrate the process before they get into seeing the value of the app); inversely some users may want to put it all up front, so giving them an outlet to do that as a work-around to your sequenced process may be advisable. Like with most apps, it depends on the types of users you are targeting, but generally speaking try not to create too many roadblocks early on (if your primary goal is first growing total users.)
If this is a problem you have already encountered on the app then I'd seek a quick fix remedy for the time being (even as simple as some text and link/CTA that takes them off that part of the screen but refer them later to it via a message etc.) either way though there are some interesting things you can do to find the right solution(s) to this and calibrate over time - things such as doing A/B or MVT testing with your layout options, using push notifications, gamifying user input etc can all be tools at your disposal to find and solve these sorts of issues. Tying this to investor preferences too is an important (but nuanced) tightrope to walk. Other factors such as security should certainly be taken into account, the exercise here is to lay out all of these details and find ways to test/validate your assumptions and solutions. As to what a potential investor prefers, oftentimes that boils down to the individual group or person you're pitching, the context you choose to provide on your chosen path and how effective you are at providing that context. But the question you ask is a classic one in app development - do you focus on the denominator (total users) first or on the numerator (the activity of what those users are doing.) there are arguments to be made for both, but you have to think what the most compelling narrative is for your app purpose and investor audience.
I've worked with many app-preneurs to build and maintain their conversion funnels/apps and maximize UGC/engagement (as well as go on to raise about a total of $250M+ in aggregate across venture financing paths); so if you'd like to talk about any other details feel free to reach out. good luck!
My suggestion would be leaning towards the simplification of the process. Require only very basic data (i.e. email) and let the user to have a great first experience with your product without unnecessary friction. (I strongly recommend FB or Google signup makes it one-step process and you get much more than just an email.)
To build the quality of your user database, you can ask for more details later. It's always a good practice to offer something in exchange, i.e. if user has 100% profile completion you benefit them with premium feature for certain period of time. Engaged users will take action. Not-engaged users will at least look good on paper and perhaps tells you more about your acquisition activities. If acquisition part of the product funnel works, then shift your focus to on-boarding and retention.
I don't want to say that capturing more data at the beginning and maintaining quality is not a goof approach. But it's likely to require more marketing efforts (both time and money) and that is a showstopper for many startups. But if have other channels how you drive the traffic and the brand is already established, than it may work.
I hope this answer will help you. Let me know what decision you have made.
Also, please feel free to reach out.
Regards,
Filip
Investors will care about the number of engaged users. Between 100 disengaged users where I know their detailed profile and 100 engaged users where i only have an email, which one do you think it is worth more?
I would avoid a police interrogatory style of subscription and go with the absolute minimum. You will always have ways to gather more info at a later stage.
As you insinuate in your question, the direction you go on this decision depends on whether you want to build a huge user base, or a highly qualified and more tailored user community.
You might consider "having your cake and eating it too" -- at one SaaS startup where I ran marketing, the conversion and traffic numbers were huge and the funnel was everything. But we asked for a lot of info up front, which trimmed the total potential universe of buyers. I advocated for breaking down the barriers to getting started with the software -- minimizing the fields needed to just an email address, so they could save their progress -- and allowing the user to see how the software works.
Once you make it easy for users to sign up and then demonstrate value, you'll establish trust, and they will be willing to give you the data you want.
So my suggestion is, consider a two-pronged data gathering / onboarding strategy (some marketers call this progressive profiling). Make it stupidly easy to get in and see how awesome the app is, but hold back a few choice features or capabilities and require incrementally more action(s) of the user to unlock those features.
Just another path you can consider. Good luck!
You 'know' it is content driven, user based, and simplifying feeds this. You assume investors are needed. Why do you think it will not generate revenue? How does it make money? Try to prove your concept will fail and you may not need to ask them. Read the Lean Start-Up
Every new field on a signup form costs you more conversions from people who might become established contributors in your community.
Registration is never a user goal in itself. Don’t assume that you’ll get users just by making the first screen of your app a sign-in wall.
Your app needs to convince people of real reasons not only for signing up but also for providing the information that you want them to provide. They need to build their trust in your app first, and the more personal the information you want is, the more trust-building it takes to convince them to provide it.
If you think of collecting this data after registration as a funnel in itself, you won’t get all of the data for everyone, but you will build up more trust. Over time, you could expect to have more data (on average) from the users in your community who are more engaged.
To collect the data in this manner, first, think of a benefit for every piece of data that you are asking for. Is it only for your benefit or clearly for theirs as well?
Second, think of the best time to ask for this information. People will have the most goodwill for contributing it if they can experience the benefit (the first step above) right after they give it to you.
So that’s the users’ perspective. Now for your investors’ perspective: how important is it for your community to be exclusive? For example, if you’re setting up a network of verified experts in a field or you clearly distinguish between contributors and consumers, you need to verify the contributors’ expertise. A community where anyone with any set of credentials can contribute will not have as strong of a need for that.
There is no doubt that the apps which have much more users are much more valuable.Then you should simplify or even remove the registration process. Here are some effective ways to gain much more users. Details as follows:
Appeal optimization
Appeal Optimization is very important. You can optimize appeal from the following aspects to increase download rates:
· Creating an simple, memorable and attractive app title
· Using eye-catching icon and screenshots and attractive videos. Graphical elements are always helpful to convince users.
· Writing a great description. Highlight your app features and advantages in first 3 lines. Keep it short and simple.
Gather Positive Reviews
Data shows that 95% users will take the app reviews as one of the most important reference factors to judge the app, and most people prefer to download an app which has much more positive reviews. Here are some effective ways to gather positive reviews:
· Invite families and friends to review app
· Reviews exchange
· Incentivize users to leave positive reviews
· Use some useful plug-in
· Buy app reviews. Bestreviewapp(https://www.bestreviewapp.com/?from=cr-chris) is a reliable provider
Get Featured on App Stores
Generally speaking, people give much more trust to the app stores, if your app get featured on the app stores, the conversion rates will be improved significantly.
Hope the 3 methods are useful to you.
Related Questions
-
When is the the right time to seek out seed capital?
I'm a small-time investor and have been working for and with startups for 13 years. The time to take seed capital is: - When you've proven demand for your product by making sales. - When you have at least one repeatable, predictable, and profitable system in place for selling your product. - When taking an equity investment would let you grow the company faster than the other means that might be at your disposal: bootstrapping, debt financing, organic growth, joint ventures, etc. There's a trade-off. You want to get the idea validated up-front and get as far as possible as you can on your own, but not spend so much time doing this with meager resources that the opportunity passes you by. You don't want to give away the whole company to your investor, but you also don't want to stunt your growth and give up huge potential profits just because you were holding out for slightly better terms. The better your sales, and sales growth, the better the valuation you'll be able to negotiate. A great idea and a proof-of-concept alone are worth basically nothing. A company with sales is worth more. A company with sales growth is worth even more. A company with month-over-month sales growth, ongoing relationships with customers who repurchase, and steady-state profitability is worth *much, much* more. (Steady-state profitability means that if the company's number of customers stays the same, the business operations turn a profit. Often, early-stage companies that have a recurring-revenue business model will spend more to acquire a new customer than they earn from the first sale; the cost of acquisition is amortized over the lifetime of the customer. This is because they want to grow their recurring-revenue base and increase future profits at the expense of short-term negative cash-flow.) All that being said, if you think you will need venture capital funding in the future, you should start looking for it long before you're going to need it. Have a "Plan B" in place, too. Don't get stuck with your back up against a wall, hoping and praying that your seed round will close before you start bouncing checks. If your investor knows you're going to go bankrupt without the investment, they have a lot of leverage for getting very favorable terms!BB
-
What are the tax consequences for founders if the seed round investors take common stock instead of preferred?
There shouldn't be any tax consequences for the founders if you've made 83b elections--the election meant you paid tax already on the full value of the stock at the time of the election (presumably zero) even though it was subject to future forfeiture. If you sell newly-issued stock there should be no tax impact. If you sell your own common stock, you'd pay tax on the gain, but I doubt that is what you mean here. Of course, you should not take the free advice dispensed on Clarity and consult your own tax preparer--this is not tax advice.BS
-
Whats are some ways to beta test an iOS app?
Apple will allow a developer to register 100 UDID devices per 12 month cycle to test via TestFlight or HockeyApp. Having started with TestFlight, I would really encourage you NOT to use it, and go directly to HockeyApp. HockeyApp is a much better product. There is also enterprise distribution which allows you far more UDID's but whether you qualify for enterprise distribution is difficult to say. As part of your testing, I'd encourage to explicitly ask your testers to only register one device. One of the things we experienced was some testers registering 3 devices but only used one, essentially wasting those UDID's where we could have given to other testers. Who you invite to be a tester should be selective as well. I think you should have no more than 10 non-user users. These people should be people who have either built successful mobile apps or who are just such huge consumers of similar mobile apps to what you're building, that they can give you great product feedback even though they aren't your user. Specifically, they can help point out non obvious UI problems and better ways to implement particular features. The rest of your users should be highly qualified as actually wanting what you're building. If they can't articulate why they should be the first to use what you're building, they are likely the wrong tester. The more you can do to make them "beg" to be a tester, the higher the sign that the feedback you're getting from them can be considered "high-signal." In a limited beta test, you're really looking to understand the biggest UX pain-points. For example, are people not registering and providing you the additional permissions you are requiring? Are they not completing an action that could trigger virality? How far are they getting in their first user session? How much time are they spending per user session? Obviously, you'll be doing your fair share of bug squashing, but the core of it is around improving the core flows to minimize friction as much as possible. Lastly, keep in mind that even with highly motivated users, their attention spans and patience for early builds is limited, so make sure that each of your builds really make significant improvements. Happy to talk through any of this and more about mobile app testing.TW
-
Can you offer 1-month or 1-week trials on in-app purchases?
You can't offer trials or even easily make refunds accessible via in-app purchases. What you can do is actually make manual deposits or write checks back to the users who ask for it. But the purchase behavior associated with in-app purchases really shouldn't require any promise of a refund. In fact, doing so might make people *less* likely to purchase being that you're telegraphing a weak offering. Happy to talk through alternate ways of testing pricing and willingness to pay in a call.TW
-
Who are some of the pre revenue start up friendly investors available to the Vancouver Canada region?
AngelList is your best bet. Since you're asking the question, chances are you don't have a way to get introduced to these investors. The simple truth (like it or not) is the chances very low that you'll get a deal done without an introduction from someone they trust. AngelList can help with that, so can going to networking events. And finally, If you're the introverted developer type, you can also get their attention by just building something really cool on your own, followed by some serious traction. Arguably the best strategy of them all.DR
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.