Logix + Excess (Or Success)
Logix + Exceed
Choosing a business name is a real hang up for some people. I've met would-be entrepreneurs that get so hung up on the perfect name that they never start! That being said a great name is very important. Gone are the days when a name has to have any industry specific meaning (look at Google, Twitter, Apple, etc). In my opinion Logixess and Logixeed are a little hard to pronounce and do not roll off the tongue. Below is a link to a great tool for choosing a name, which also gives you available domains. I created the name for my company "Zapaty" with this tool. Best of luck! Here is the link. http://www.bustaname.com/word_maker
If you have any more questions, feel free to reach out.
No. They are difficult to spell, challenging to pronounce and violate a wealth of basic linguistic principles. But don't believe me: You can prove this to yourself.
Give the names, written down, and nothing else, to 10 people who don't know you. Ask them to pronounce them.
Next, pronounce the names for 10 other people and ask them to spell it. Both tests will fail.
Furthermore, they are neither memorable nor evocative.
You're falling prey to the Latinate myth: if I create a name using etymologies or metonyms, and glom them together, I will have a great name. But you won't. You'll have a glommed-together name instead that does not evoke the meaning of any of the etymological roots or metonyms! Sometimes 1+1 = 0.
For details on the linguistic and branding criteria, read my LinkedIn post "Names That Got Game: 4 Steps To A Killer Name & Getting Buy-In" at:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/names-got-game-4-steps-picking-killer-name-getting-buy-in-mason?trk=prof-post
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me.
Best of luck,
Steven
Neither is great, and here's why: both names try to be clever but end up feeling forced. In B2B software, especially for industrial field equipment, the name needs to communicate reliability and precision — not wordplay.
Logixess reads as "Logix + Excess" which carries a slightly negative connotation. Excess in industrial contexts suggests waste, not performance.
Logixeed is cleaner — "Logix + Exceed" works conceptually — but it's hard to pronounce on first read and will constantly be misspelled. In B2B, your name lives in contracts, procurement systems and technical documentation. Complexity kills.
My honest recommendation: go simpler. The strongest B2B software names are short, pronounceable, and domain-available. Think about what your product actually does — monitor and control field equipment based on logic — and name it around that core promise, not around a wordplay construction.
If you're set on the Logix root, something like LogiField, LogiControl or simply Logixis would be cleaner and more memorable in a B2B buying context.
