Loading...
Answers
MenuHow do I approach a potential partner who could build the feature themselves instead of partnering with me?
My start-up has built a very smart way of doing 360 degree manager reviews, which solves a real problem in the industry. We've redesigned the value-added feature so that it could be used to improve ANY existing 360 degree survey (with some integration). The idea is to open it up to our competitors so they can improve their own offerings to their clients. The danger is that they decide to build the feature themselves instead of partnering with us (probably take about 3 months of work). How do I prevent this and make it more attractive to work with us than doing it themselves? And should I approach the biggest players first, or start with the smaller guys?
Answers
I've gone down similar paths in the past. Here are your options:
1) Provisional Patent. if an implementation of their system to his new market would be patentable (i.e. using machine X to make donuts instead of jewelry), then you could file a provisional patent on the idea. Provisional patents are very informal and cheap. They can essentially be written on the back of a napkin, and filed for ~$100. They last for only a year, after which you have to convert them into a 'real patent', otherwise your idea will become open to the public to use.
2) An NDA. You could have them sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), which would have wording in it that basically says, "I'm going to tell you something, and unless you have existing proof that you already had thought of that idea, then you're not allowed to use my idea without my consent". Sometimes the company will not want to sign an NDA because they may have discussed a lot of ideas without writing them down, and by signing your NDA, they'd legally lose the right to use one of those non-written-down ideas. But it's worth a shot.
3) Rely on trust. The way to make this more likely to work is if you are good friends with a big investor in their company, or something like that. Some situation in which, if they steal your idea, they'd be ruining their reputation with someone they care about (they probably don't care about pissing you yourself off). If you don't have such a connection, maybe you can form one (linkedin, etc.).
If you'd like to discuss your options in more detail, incorporating actual experiences of mine, let me know,
all the best,
Lee
Have them sign an NDA.
You'd be surprised how many partners are willing to collaborate so that they don't need to build a particular feature themselves. They have their own roadmaps and initiatives. If your feature really is a value add to their offering and they feel they can sell it to their customers, I suspect they'll consider negotiating.
I personally wouldn't go to the biggest players first. There may be more departmental segmentation, more execs to convince, and more red tape involved in closing the deal. They also, like you said, have the capacity to build the feature themselves. NDAs are great and legally binding, but if you don't have the capital to stand up against them in court, you may be at a loss. You really don't want to be in a position where someone else holds all of the control.
You have something to offer. You should remain in the position of control (even if it does lead to a negotiation.)
Smaller or similar sized businesses may be more willing to join forces as it serves as a win win scenario.
Partnerships are about creating a win/win situation. Companies are in general open to partnering when you have to offer something that will allow them to win together with you in the market in an easier way than when they do it all alone.
From that perspective start with looking at the potential partners out there and define which one of them have the best fit with your company culture and product portfolio. Go for this low hanging fruit and approach those partners first. Decide if you will ask them to sign an NDA or not.
Partner selection and creating partnerships can be guarded by contracts but on the other hand trust is essential. If there is no fit and no trust then contracts won't help you to create a healthy relationship. Have a look at my 4-step guide to partner selection, it might be helpful: https://gumroad.com/l/cMyfD
Happy to jump on a call to dive deeper into this with you.
Go to all potential partners, although you might find the smaller ones easier to approach.
As someone mentioned, your sales pitch is basically selling the time to market & resources. If the feature is strategic, expect they will try to develop it themselves; if not, you are in with a shot.
For the first meeting, I would not spend too much time on NDA's & patents, however I would only talk about the overall solution and partnership. DNA's and patents will become important for the following meetings.
Go for it. The worst you could do is do nothing.
Good luck
PS: I think you will be pleasantly surprised on how much you will learn on your potential partners / competitors.
Related Questions
-
If you could ask each of your employees a question each day, what would you ask?
"What was the best part of you day?" Ideally you could ask in the afternoon .. but it sets a positive intention. I ask this to all my friends + wife everyday when I see them.DM
-
My company is growing and expanding.. do you suggest franchise or partnerships?
Can the model be franchised? Are your margins large enough such that a franchisee will be able to make a profit AND pay your franchise fees? If you go down the franchise route, you will be changing the nature of your business from being a gym operator to being a franchisor, or seller of business systems. Do you have your systems perfected to the point where someone will pay for them? Do you have the resources to start supporting the needs of franchisees? What kinds of needs will they have? Coaching, support, etc. They will be expecting innovation in marketing and product delivery from you. Are you prepared to sell off your existing locations as franchises and focus solely on this new business model for yourself? In 2007 I owned a small business with a partner and faced the same question you are now. In the end we decided to sell our operating company and sell the IP within our systems in a 'do it yourself business kit.' It's worked brilliantly because we required no further investment but get a cash flow from the materials. If you'd like an idea of how to format an attractive franchise opportunity. I recommend my recent book Franchise Warnings. Available from Amazon.DC
-
How do I setup a strategic partnership agreement without having to do a rev/profit share deal?
If you are really investing in a strategic partner (one that will provide mutual benefit in the end, either in terms of revenues, access to financing or other resources) then revenue sharing isn't absolutely necessary. In the partnerships I help to form, they are often around shared value (http://www.fsg.org/OurApproach/WhatisSharedValue.aspx) which means shared revenue isn't the absolute aim. What is the aim, however, is sharing information, knowledge, technical assistance, operational help, etc) and build a lasting framework for engagement together into the future that will benefit both parties. I am happy to help you negotiate these types of partnerships (it's what I do!) so feel free to get in touch.JS
-
I need partners to help my company launch. How many shares and/or how much profit do I offer to get them?
There are several factors to consider: 1. Profit share does not have to equal equity. As an example, two people can agree to split net profits 50/50 even though the percentage of equity is split 60/40. Just get it in writing. So find out their expectations for long term income and equity. Are they expecting a share of net profits or just the ability to recoup their investment when you sell the business? 2. What value do they bring to your business? Are they funding? Are they bringing significant contacts or the ability to secure contracts? Are they helping with infrastructure or product development? What would you pay someone in salary with no equity to do the same exact thing? 3. Are the short term or long term? In other words, once they help you launch, do they continue to have value in building the company? Or, are they no longer needed? There is no right answer to how you compensate them for helping you get started. But, try to look at all the value variables. Maybe that will help you identify what they are ultimately worth and what a fair, win-win offer would be. It sounds like they are very reasonable and you have a good opportunity to get their help for a reasonable compensation package. Good luck. If you would like to talk more about this at no charge, I offer a one time free call to new callers. Just use this link to schedule a call. https://clarity.fm/kevinmccarthy/FreeConsultKM
-
What is the best way for a fin-tech (mobile wallet) startup to approach a bank for an operational partnership? For eg. Stripe & Wells Fargo
Depending on the market, a bank is going to look at a combination of low-cost customer acquisition (particularly in strategic growth segments), mass-market desposit mobilization, credit portfolio growth and fee-based income. The respective weight of these, in terms of relative importance, will depend on the bank and its strategic objectives. It will also vary based in whether you are talking to an acquiring or an issuing bank. The best way to approach a bank is therefore to identify which core business element your startup is best positioned to support, and which bank is likelier to find the value prop attractive. I would suggest talking to the head of retail banking, the head of credit business and the head of acquiring business.AM
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.