Loading...
Answers
MenuShall we register our company before testing the MVP?
Answers
I do not believe you should incorporate your company yet as there is a chance you will scrap the idea or iterate on the assumptions after analysis. I suggest you run your initial testing on a very minimal MVP to see if there is interest. I would go further in saying that you should not even allow people to pay only have them click on the payment option because at that point you know that it would be a conversion. The ONLY thing you are proving with an MVP is validation of an idea. Only make the mousetrap front end and see if you can drive users to where you want and stop. Even if you frustrate some people, it was worth it as you now know for sure people will buy or do what it is you wanted. Schedule a call with me to find out more. God knows I have done this enough times.
Good luck
Josh
MVP is a product development methodology - fail fast, fail forward and be agile to customer changes. It is not be confused with a legal entity formation.
If it is a market place, the MVP would still be able to do a transaction. Do you want to tie any liability issues coming from the transaction, or the parties involved to you ?
Company formation is so damn cheap now that you should not be even thinking twice. I would say register it.
MVP is for the product , not for business. If you want to translate the lean approach to business, it would be a lean business. Don't have a company accountant, loyar, hr person etc .. you can use on-demand services.
But you still need to have the corporate functions in a lean way. Say you get $500 in sales. It is still taxable and needs to part of someones book.
You don't have to register a company
- If there is no $ or liability involved
- If you are not raising money now
- If it is just a Proof of concept
If you are launching (even it is MVP), it is better to launch with a trim version of a company (LLC atleast). If it is a B2B market place then the parties / vendors will not work with an individual, you need a company then..
I have had situation in the past, where the company field was mandatory and I had to fake it many many times...
Hey, if you need any kind of help related to technology, feel free to chat. - My expertise are in Solution Delivery, Project management, Technology management, Product architecture, Technology advisory.
Nefin
You are approaching this bass-ackwards. Incorporation is never the goal or a milestone. It's a means to a certain end.
You should not be asking yourself, "are we big enough to incorporate?" Your question should be "What am I trying to accomplish and is incorporation going to help me get there?"
Is your goal to look cool because you have a registered company? Do you have investors knocking on your door hoping to buy shares in your business? Are you trying to shield yourself from some liability that is inherent in your product? Are you looking for a better tax structure for your business?
Until you know WHY you are even contemplating incorporation, you can't answer when is the right time to do it.
This is all very fact specific. Feel free to request a call if you want to discuss
Deciding whether to register your company before testing your MVP involves weighing the benefits and drawbacks. Here are the key considerations to help you make an informed decision:
### Benefits of Registering Before Launch
1. **Legal Protection**:
- **Liability Shield**: Registering as an LLC or corporation provides a shield for your personal assets against any legal claims related to your business operations.
2. **Credibility and Trust**:
- **Professionalism**: A registered company can enhance credibility with customers, partners, and potential investors, showing you are serious about your business.
3. **Compliance and Legal Requirements**:
- **Payment Processing**: If your MVP involves receiving payments, having a registered company simplifies setting up business bank accounts and payment processing systems.
- **Taxes and Licenses**: Operating as a registered entity ensures compliance with tax obligations and necessary business licenses.
### Drawbacks of Registering Before Launch
1. **Cost**:
- **Upfront Expenses**: Registration fees, legal fees, and ongoing compliance costs can add up, which might be burdensome before validating your business model.
2. **Administrative Burden**:
- **Complexity**: Managing the administrative requirements of a registered business can be time-consuming and complex, diverting attention from MVP development and testing.
### Considerations for Delaying Registration
1. **Testing and Validation**:
- **Proof of Concept**: If you are in the early stages and want to validate your business model with minimal costs, you might opt to delay registration until you have some initial validation.
2. **Lean Approach**:
- **Iterate Quickly**: Without the formalities of a registered business, you can iterate and pivot quickly based on user feedback.
### Mitigating Risks If You Delay Registration
1. **Use Personal Accounts**:
- **Temporary Solutions**: Use personal bank accounts and payment processing tools to handle transactions temporarily. Ensure clear records to separate business finances from personal ones.
2. **Draft Basic Agreements**:
- **Legal Documents**: Even without formal registration, draft basic terms of service, privacy policies, and agreements to provide some level of legal protection.
3. **Insurance**:
- **Business Insurance**: Consider getting business insurance to cover potential liabilities during the testing phase.
### When to Register
- **Receiving Significant Payments**: If your MVP starts to generate significant revenue, it’s prudent to register to handle financial transactions professionally and comply with tax regulations.
- **Engaging with Investors**: If you seek or receive investment, most investors will require you to have a registered entity.
- **Legal Exposure**: If your business involves significant legal risks (e.g., user data handling, substantial financial transactions), registering early provides necessary legal protection.
### Conclusion
If the costs and administrative burden of registering now are prohibitive, you might consider testing and validating your MVP first. However, keep in mind the legal and financial risks involved. Use temporary solutions to manage transactions and mitigate risks, and plan to register your company as soon as you have validated your business model and are ready to scale.
Would you like assistance with setting up temporary legal protections or further guidance on when and how to register your business?
Related Questions
-
How do you build a MVP for an innovative tech b2b product? We would need good amount of funding to build a decent MVP and show businesses.
The idea of an MVP is 'minimum, viable' ... If you feel you need a "good amount" of funding, I would challenge if you are minimum enough. Obviously, without knowing the details of your product, your ideal customer, or what need you will solve, it is hard to help expose what is necessary in an MVP and what is a Phase II or Phase III feature. I am happy to help you work through this, or answer specific questions, to get you rolling. Just book a call with some times that will work for you. Regardless, I would love to know more about it and how it goes after launch. To your success, -ShaunSN
-
If I have 51 percent and my partner has 49 percent of our company, what real decision making authority would I have?
On paper you have the advantage but after several startups control resides in he who knows how to execute the vision of the company.HJ
-
What's the best way to build a MVP web app that handles order management, purchasing, invoicing, supplier management and inventory?
The best way to build an MVP for any SaaS product is to create a landing page that looks like a real product. Here's an example of one I built. http://www.happiily.com In this case, it advertises the primary features of the product and invites people to sign-up. When they do, they are asked for information which qualifies the person and then sends me an email. I built this quickly and very inexpensively and started getting inbound leads from it shortly thereafter. I got on the phone with each person who signed-up and explained the features I wanted to build and was able to do a lot of customer learning based on that. Happy to talk to you in a call if you'd like to talk more about customer development with SaaS products.TW
-
What is the best method for presenting minimum viable products to potential customers?
Whoa, start by reading the Lean book again; you're questions suggest you are making a classical mistake made by too many entrepreneurs who live and breath Lean Startup. An MVP is not the least you can show someone to evaluate whether or not building it is a good idea; an MVP is, by it's very definition, the Minimum Viable Product - not less than that. What is the minimum viable version of a professional collaboration network in which users create a professional profile visible to others? A website on which users can register, have a profile, and in some way collaborate with others: via QA, chat, content, etc. No? A minimum viable product is used not to validate if something is a good idea but that you can make it work; that you can acquire users through the means you think viable, you can monetize the business, and that you can learn from the users' experience and optimize that experience by improving the MVP. Now, that doesn't mean you just go build your MVP. I get the point of your question, but we should distinguish where you're at in the business and if you're ready for an MVP or you need to have more conversations with potential users. Worth noting, MOST entrepreneurs are ready to go right to an MVP. It's a bit of a misleading convention to think that entrepreneurs don't have a clue about the industry in which they work and what customers want; that is to say, you shouldn't be an entrepreneur trying to create this professional collaboration network if you don't know the market, have done some homework, talked to peers and friends, have some experience, etc. and already know that people DO want such a thing. Presuming you've done that, what would you present to potential users BEFORE actually building the MVP? For what do you need nothing more than some slides? It's not a trick question, you should show potential users slides and validate that what you intend to build is the best it can be. I call it "coffee shop testing" - build a slide of the homepage and the main screen used by registered users; sit in a coffee shop, and buy coffee for anyone who will give you 15 minutes. Show them the two slides and listen; don't explain, ONLY ask.... - For what is this a website? - Would you sign up for it? Why? - Would you tell your friends? Why? - What would you pay for it? Don't explain ANYTHING. If you have to explain something, verbally, you aren't ready to build your MVP - potential customers don't get it. Keep working with that slide alone until you get enough people who say they will sign up and know, roughly, what people will pay. THEN build your MVP and introduce it first to friends, family, peers, etc. to get your earliest adopters. At some point you're going to explore investors. There is no "ready" as the reaction from investors will entirely depend on who you're talking to, why, how much you need, etc. If you want to talk to investors with only the slides as you need capital to build the MVP, your investors are going to be banks, grants, crowdfunding, incubators, and MAYBE angels (banks are investors?! of course they are, don't think that startups only get money from people with cash to give you for equity). Know that it's VERY hard to raise money at this stage; why would I invest in your idea when all you've done is validate that people probably want it - you haven't built anything. A bank will give you a loan to do that, not many investors will take the risk. Still, know not that your MVP is "ready" but that at THAT stage, you have certain sources of capital with which you could have a conversation. When you build the MVP, those choices change. Now that you have something, don't talk to a bank, but a grant might still be viable. Certainly: angels, crowdfunding, accelerators, and maybe even VCs become interested. The extent to which they are depends on the traction you have relative to THEIR expectations - VCs are likely to want some significant adoption or revenue whereas Angels should be excited for your early adoption and validation and interested in helping you scale.PO
-
How do I deal with a partner/investor that hasn't delivered on his end of things and now wants his money back?
This sounds as a deja vu to me. I have been in a similar situation back in 2000, we could only solve the issue thanks to a good mediator. However every situation is different and hence your route to a solution might be different. It also depends where you are in the world that defines how an email and/or verbal agreement might be a sufficient ground for legal actions. I am not a lawyer and can not judge that.PS
the startups.com platform
Copyright © 2025 Startups.com. All rights reserved.